A Christian view about Islam, Islamist terrorism, Al-Qaeda and the Muslim jihad against western imperialism, Christianity and Israel.

[Risto 0]

http://stop-islam.tripod.com/

The American imperialism and individual liberty

Occidental culture is increasingly spreading all over the world. Ancestral traditions and habits are disappearing giving place to fast food, Hollywood movies, rock music, discos and so on. One can ask oneself whether this is good. We in Europe are also suffering from this diminution of regional culture and it is clear that there is appearing a certain americaphobia among people, especially in France. Outside of Europe, Muslim nations are the most opposed to western values, especially after the war in Iraq.

However, America is not spreading its culture all over the world using force. In fact, the war in Iraq is a military action, but the aim of this action is to promulgate democracy. And by definition, democracy cannot maintained by force. Therefore, the Occidental culture is adopted freely because there is a demand for it elsewhere in the world. How is this possible? It's because America holds the image of a winner, especially after World War II. With the military superiority also came automatically and without forcing the spreading of the culture because people liked to adopt the image of superiority of the superpower. This was always so in history that has formed several superpowers: Babylon, Egypt, Persia, Greece, the Roman Empire, Europe... Of course, this always led to a diminution of the ancient identity and it is evident that the "superculture" was not welcomed by everyone and even had very vehement opponents.

This opposition is legitimate as long as individual liberty is respected, that is free speech, which actually is not granted in most Muslim nations. The sources of this non-respect of individual liberty lies in Islam, which has been an oppressing religion from the start and has been transmitted from generation to generation up to our days using both psychological intimidation and physical oppression.

The war in Iraq and the "peace movements"

Everyone must have the right to choose its religion freely. This is why I approve the war in Iraq. If there is no chance of installing democracy by non-violent means, then military force must be used if there is hope of being successful with low risk that human lives are sacrificed. It is clear that this risk was completely underestimated but it was the risk to take. This approval of war is similar to what the Koran is saying concerning jihad. However, there is a big difference if one tries to install totalitarianism or democracy. This makes it very different from jihad. If there is no other way, it's the only answer to Islam.

Totalitarianism is the worst form of a political system, especially if the right of information is restricted. In the past, the communist countries were the most hostile to the free world. Today, communism goes towards its end and other dictatorships represent danger for the free world but there remains some relationship between the ancient totalitarian regimes and the Muslim countries. Or is it just by chance that France, Germany and Russia were against the war in Iraq? I don't think so because all three countries have had pronounced dictatorships in the past. France had a very centralized Monarchy and later Napoleon. Germany had Hitler and Russia the soviet communism.

I also see in the numerous "demonstrations for peace" a kind of relationship with totalitarianism because most of the people who go to such demonstrations are socialist. However, socialism issued from communism and is similarly indoctrinating as Islam although their content is very different. In fact, holding up fists and crying slogans uses intimidation rather than argumentation. Therefore, such "demonstrations for peace" are not fundamentally different from hysteric demonstrations of Muslims defending one or another of their leaders or false prophets. After all, these demonstrations helped to maintain Saddam Hussein at power longer than necessary. Socialists are always the first to cry "intolerance" when Muslims are treated apart because of national security measures (as for instance show sites like Socialists and Islam or Islam & socialism). However, what to think of people who never thought about demonstrating against dictators like Saddam Hussein, who killed thousands of Kurds, and against terrorists like Osama Ben Laden, but who go eagerly in the streets calling the American president a murder and terrorist? This silence facing terrorism proves their radicalism and sympathy for terrorism and dictatorship.

They are marionettes of Osama bin Laden because they say to themselves: "Look, these terrorists are so desperate that they give their own live in a bomb attack, so Muslim must be threaten unjustly by the Occident otherwise they wouldn't do that." Therefore, according to socialist logic the cause of terrorism is the Occident. However, the terrorists know that a large part of the Occident population is thinking like this and are using it for their propaganda. They are like soccer players feigning a foul to get a penalty. They are not desperate nor does Occident treat them unjustly. All they want is power and establish Islam everywhere on the world by any possible means. The general americaphobia in the world is the product of terrorism. The Islamist bomb attacks will continue as long as the American policy is held responsible for terrorism.

This is the principle of the Devil: he wants to get at the place of God. For this purpose, he needs to prove that he is the good one and God the bad one. This is why he is feigning being a victim of God. He gets mad claiming that God is the source of his illness and of his hatred against God. He is transforming himself in the victim of God. This way, he is able to convince a large number of persons to follow him. The Islamist terrorists use exactly the same principle. This is why their powerbrokers are Devils.

Islam is a misleading doctrine and Mohammed a false prophet

The doctrine of Islam, the Koran, itself is restricting individual rights. So it is not surprising that Mohamed imposed it to all Arabic nations by war and terror. Today, the Islamist terrorists like Osama Ben Laden, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and all the others are trying to do the same. They are not interested in knowing the truth about God, because truth is something that cannot be imposed but must freely be understood without any intimidation. The only thing they are interested in is power. So it's evident that they are opposed to superpowers like America, Europe or Russia.

The western civilization is Christian in its origins. However, it is becoming, especially in Europe, increasingly an atheistic society. This is why I partly understand that Muslims often call us "unbelievers" and that they defend their culture and religion against imperialism and growing atheism in the world. But often they think of Jews and Christians being "unbelievers", which is extremely arrogant because from their point of view both Jews and Muslims have a common ancestor, that is Abraham. And they also believe in Jesus as a prophet. In addition, all three religions confess God the Creator of heaven and earth, and of all living beings. There are many other points like the Last Judgment that are commonly believed. So if Muslims consider Christians and Jews unbelievers, they just reveal how wicked they are.

Of course, Muslims call us unbelievers because we don't believe in Mohamed, the founder of Islam, as a prophet sent by God. However, there are many prophets in the past claiming being sent by God. Why should one believe in this or another self-proclaimed prophet? If Mohamed is a prophet, what other prophet before him announced his coming? In the Bible is nothing indicating that any prophet shall come after Jesus Christ. This is why I don't believe in Mohammed, just as I don't believe in Joseph Smith, the founder of the Mormon religion, or in L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of scientology. The prophets had their life before Christ, who is not a prophet but the incarnated Son of God, The prophet's job was to witness the arrival of the Messiah, the Son of God. This is why, after the arrival of Jesus Christ the work for prophets has become superfluous. In this sense, John the Baptist was the last prophet. All people coming after him and claiming being prophets are false prophets (see Are there Prophecies about Muhammad in the Bible?). The saints are not considered being prophets but exceptional people who follow the example of Jesus. They give no new messages to Christian teaching. Therefore, Mohammed is a false prophet who invented the Koran to satisfy self-centered purposes.

Islam is a possible candidate for the doctrine of the future Antichrist. This even more than atheism because the Antichrist will be a religious person accepting Jesus but denying that he is the Son of God (see Islam: The Religion of Antichrist). All Muslims are awaiting for a future prophet named Al-Mahdi who is supposed to establish Islam everywhere on the planet. Contrary to what could be expected from a mentally healthy society, Islam is progressing in America and in Europe because of the terror attacks (see Waking up to the Islamic Revival). It is seducing the modern society, which is increasingly glorifying violence. For some kind of people it is the legitimization for terrorizing all "miscreants" and killing in the name of what they consider the Almighty. So it is possible that sooner or later someone will arrive to "fulfill this prophecy", that is to successfully exploit this Islamic popular believe in Al-Mahdi, and that Islam will be spread all over the world in a near future. Yet, this will not last for ever.

The Holocaust of the Jews and the end of Islam

Hitler tried to exterminate the Jews during World War II, but in 1948 they founded their own state, Israel, which exemplarily shows that it does not help to fight against an ideology, religion or a people by means of violence. If one does so, one just gets the contrary of what one is fighting. This is why Jesus said: "Unless a wheat grain falls on the ground and dies, it remains only a grain. But if it dies, it yields a rich harvest" (John 12:24). With this, Jesus referred to his own dead, the Sacrifice of the Cross, which led to the persecutions of the first Christians by the Roman Empire, which finally led to the victory of Christianity when it was declared state religion by Constantine the Great. As for the Jews, their sacrifice was the Holocaust, which caused their victory through the foundation of modern Israel.

Are the Palestinians victims of the Israeli occupation policy? No, because the earth belongs to nobody, everyone can go there who he wants to be as long as this is economically possible. The Jews made the desert flourish and transformed the region into an economically important state. So why should they not have the right to be there?

Once I saw on television saying a Pakistan Muslim: "If Osama Bin Laden will be killed by American forces, thousands of other Osama Bin Laden will replace him". What to think about killing Christians? There exists eternal justice that will take place one day and revenge all injustices. Therefore, if the killing of all Christians and all other "miscreants" is the only way to establish Islam worldwide, it will finally have as effect to extend everlasting Christianity all over the world. This is the effect of any sacrifice.

This is why the Islamist's dream of a everlasting reign of Islam will not be realized. In the contrary, with spreading terrorism they are programming the end of Islam. They will end like Hitler and national socialism. If one sows destruction, one will earn destruction. Jesus Christ said: "Do not judge, and you will not be judged, because the judgments you give are the judgments you will get, and the amount you measure out is the amount you will be given" (Matthew 7:1).

[sarah and hicham 3]

NO ONE REPLY! DO NOT GIVE THIS PERSON THE SATISFACTION OF LETTING HIM KNOW YOU HAVE EVEN SPENT 5 SECONDS ON HIS POST HERE.

PLEASE!