A Conservative Read On Palin's 'Going Rogue'

[scandal 951]

Heard on NPR ATC tonight.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.p...oryId=120508053

A Conservative Read On Palin's 'Going Rogue'

November 17, 2009

Sarah Palin is back to tell us that she loves Alaska. And America. And Todd, the First Dude. She loves God, Ronald Reagan, cutting taxes and serving those she calls "ordinary hardworking people." Who's on Sarah's enemies list? The media. Good ol' boys who condescend to her. Elites like the Alaskan gadfly she describes as a "Birkenstock-and-granola Berkeley grad." Oh, and she really hates cynical McCain campaign staffers who, in her view, sabotaged her vice-presidential campaign.

That's pretty much everything you need to know about Going Rogue, the former Alaska governor's breezy new memoir. There's more about the intricacies of Alaskan politics than most readers could possibly care about. There are also familiar stories of life on the campaign trail. But Going Rogue is a book designed to re-introduce Palin as a national political force, and — though she's coy about this — to lay the groundwork for a 2012 presidential run.

The rap on Palin is that she's too shallow and inexperienced for the presidency — a conclusion that early Palin supporters like me came to during the 2008 campaign. Alas, for conservatives in search of a champion, there's nothing in Going Rogue to challenge that conclusion. It's like this: Palin spends seven pages dishing about her appearance on Saturday Night Live, but just over one page discussing her national security views.

Palin positions herself as a populist, but her populism is entirely cultural. She never misses an opportunity to tell us how weepy she gets when she thinks about our country and its military. She fires the governor's mansion chef, who is bored because her kids won't eat his fancypants food. She swoons over a meal of homemade blueberry pie from "hardworking, unpretentious, patriotic" Alaskans — unlike, one presumes, those uppity Berkeley snobs who prefer tarte Tatin at Chez Panisse.

A little of that goes a long way, and I wouldn't begrudge Palin a bit of it if her populism had any economic substance. Early in Going Rogue she talks in detail about how Exxon exploited the people of Alaska in the Exxon Valdez disaster. And her experience tangling with oil companies taught Palin about how big business colludes with government to create a crony capitalism that harms the common good.

And yet, she's incapable of understanding how the uncritically pro-business economic agenda she touts makes this possible.

"In national politics, some feel that big Business is always opposed to the Little Guy," she writes. "Some people seem to think a profit motive is inherently greedy and evil, and that what's good for business is bad for people. (That's what Karl Marx thought too.)"

Karl Marx! Well, say no more! Along those lines, Palin's economic program amounts to nothing more than tax-cutting, deregulating and the endless repetition of shopworn GOP talking points.

This is the Republican Party's great populist hope?

Sarah Palin is selling a personality, not a platform. That's not dumb. She's doing the best she can with what she has to work with. She quotes her father's line upon her resignation this summer as Alaska's governor: "Sarah's not retreating, she's reloading." On evidence of this book, Sarah Palin is charging toward 2012 shooting blanks.

Rod Dreher is a conservative columnist at The Dallas Morning News and writes the Crunchy Con blog on Beliefnet.com.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I'd like to see a side ####### shot of Palin like in Nagi's sig. Or do you think they really sag after all of those kids?

[scandal 951]

I'd like to see a side ####### shot of Palin like in Nagi's sig. Or do you think they really sag after all of those kids?

Sigh. I post a serious political thread and you want to hijack it for side boobs on post #2.

Ok, you win!

[spookyturtle 9,466]

But what is there to be serious about with Palin as a politician?

[scandal 951]

But what is there to be serious about with Palin as a politician?

Hmm.

You make a very good point

Is it just me, or does no one else think that her spending 7 pages discussing Saturday Night Live and 1 page discussing national security pretty much sums up what her whole shtick is about?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Elites like the Alaskan gadfly she describes as a "Birkenstock-and-granola Berkeley grad."

It's interesting how the trailer-trash wing of the GOP likes to sneer at people with educations. This is why I'd like to see Gingrich run in the primary in 2012... inject some intellect into the proceedings.

[HAL 9000 96]

I'm going to ask my GOP family in FL to campaign for Palin.

[scandal 951]

I'm actually with Confucian on this one.

I like Mitt Romney for 2012 GOP.

I seriously do. He did health care pretty well in MA, he's got a head for business, he's not a total idiot, and he dresses nicely. What more do you want from a GOP candidate?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I'm actually with Confucian on this one.

I like Mitt Romney for 2012 GOP.

I seriously do. He did health care pretty well in MA, he's got a head for business, he's not a total idiot, and he dresses nicely. What more do you want from a GOP candidate?

Who let the dogs out!

[웃 910]

I'm actually with Confucian on this one.

I like Mitt Romney for 2012 GOP.

I seriously do. He did health care pretty well in MA, he's got a head for business, he's not a total idiot, and he dresses nicely. What more do you want from a GOP candidate?

Who let the dogs out!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

bling bling

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I'm actually with Confucian on this one.

I like Mitt Romney for 2012 GOP.

I seriously do. He did health care pretty well in MA, he's got a head for business, he's not a total idiot, and he dresses nicely. What more do you want from a GOP candidate?

I think Romney's ok. Better than McCain and Palin.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I want to watch a freewheeling, moderation-free debate between Obama and Gingrich. I have a sneaking suspicion that Gingrich would eviscerate him.

[scandal 951]

Yes, this thread has potential.

It can't decide if it's about Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, or side boobs.

Maybe we should hijack it into a sasquatch thread?

[Niels Bohr 72]

Her book is more about how the media manipulates the audience by posting erroneous or rumors as headlines. It's true. Sometimes when a newspaper post their articles, there's large quotations that emphasizes small comments to make it outrageous.

Example, "Today, the dog was euthanized because of the owner not being careful; however, the owner says, "accidents happens, I am responsible that is why my dog needs to be euthanized"

They like to hide the reasons, stir the pot.