Jump to content
Sofiyya

Lou Dobbs leaves CNN

 Share

175 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

You rolled me BY? Keep your gay fantasies to yourself. I don't generally delve into arguments about crime or race with you because it's like playing chess with a kid with downs syndrome. At some point, you're going to tip the board over and shout "I WIN!!".

For your information BY, that there was opinion, so there is no need to cite any references. Now, if I made a statement like "BY is a retard", my citation would be a link to your profile and instructions to look at your previous posts.

Keep dreaming. You are just like every other idiotic liberal in this forum. Lockstep on everything and refuse to accept any and every evidence that goes against your opinion. I on the other hand do not target the source of information, I analyze what is in it. Hence, when Steven posted a report from a Latino organization promoting illegal immigration, I went straight for the facts rather than the source. I guess an education worth more than the average house in LA teaches you that.

Let me refresh your memory as it seems to be affected by the drugs and ubersdoucheness down there.

For obvious reasons crim.

Lets see who the crim really is:

Homicide (per 100,000)

LA: 10

AUS: 1.5

Robberies (per 100,000)

LA: 348

AUS: 116

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You rolled me BY? Keep your gay fantasies to yourself. I don't generally delve into arguments about crime or race with you because it's like playing chess with a kid with downs syndrome. At some point, you're going to tip the board over and shout "I WIN!!".

For your information BY, that there was opinion, so there is no need to cite any references. Now, if I made a statement like "BY is a retard", my citation would be a link to your profile and instructions to look at your previous posts.

Keep dreaming. You are just like every other idiotic liberal in this forum. Lockstep on everything and refuse to accept any and every evidence that goes against your opinion. I on the other hand do not target the source of information, I analyze what is in it. Hence, when Steven posted a report from a Latino organization promoting illegal immigration, I went straight for the facts rather than the source. I guess an education worth more than the average house in LA teaches you that.

Let me refresh your memory as it seems to be affected by the drugs and ubersdoucheness down there.

For obvious reasons crim.

Lets see who the crim really is:

Homicide (per 100,000)

LA: 10

AUS: 1.5

Robberies (per 100,000)

LA: 348

AUS: 116

Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

keTiiDCjGVo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
You rolled me BY? Keep your gay fantasies to yourself. I don't generally delve into arguments about crime or race with you because it's like playing chess with a kid with downs syndrome. At some point, you're going to tip the board over and shout "I WIN!!".

For your information BY, that there was opinion, so there is no need to cite any references. Now, if I made a statement like "BY is a retard", my citation would be a link to your profile and instructions to look at your previous posts.

Keep dreaming. You are just like every other idiotic liberal in this forum. Lockstep on everything and refuse to accept any and every evidence that goes against your opinion. I on the other hand do not target the source of information, I analyze what is in it. Hence, when Steven posted a report from a Latino organization promoting illegal immigration, I went straight for the facts rather than the source. I guess an education worth more than the average house in LA teaches you that.

Let me refresh your memory as it seems to be affected by the drugs and ubersdoucheness down there.

For obvious reasons crim.

Lets see who the crim really is:

Homicide (per 100,000)

LA: 10

AUS: 1.5

Robberies (per 100,000)

LA: 348

AUS: 116

Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

Thats BY delusional logic for you. BY, you've never rolled me on any subject that I have engaged you in. You still insist upon posting greater metro L.A. figures when I've told you where I actually live. Your ignorance is not my problem.

You ignore all facts that are not inline with your dogma. You are inflexible to anything and everything that proves you wrong. You look at the facts in the material and not the source? Well, maybe looking at the source would do you some good. I'd prefer a study from a source that doesn't have an agenda to push, or reason to distort facts. Try a neutral source some time BY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

There still has yet to be proof of Lou Dobbs being a racist.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

THey don't explain the difference for you because you refuse to even listen. Typical BY. The excuses as you call them are facts that refudiate your opinion. See what he did there?

There still has yet to be proof of Lou Dobbs being a racist.

Try watching his show sometime. You can watch archives, or wait until he's on Fox. He's normally very even handed, but when it comes to Mexicans, 'ol Lou gets all rabid and has to show his complete disdain for all hispanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats BY delusional logic for you. BY, you've never rolled me on any subject that I have engaged you in. You still insist upon posting greater metro L.A. figures when I've told you where I actually live. Your ignorance is not my problem.

You ignore all facts that are not inline with your dogma. You are inflexible to anything and everything that proves you wrong. You look at the facts in the material and not the source? Well, maybe looking at the source would do you some good. I'd prefer a study from a source that doesn't have an agenda to push, or reason to distort facts. Try a neutral source some time BY.

I ignore the facts? :lol:

Okay, Let me get CA's stats:

Homicide (per 100,000)

CA: 6.7

AUS: 1.5

Robberies (per 100,000)

CA: 172

AUS: 116

Population

CA: 35 million

AUS: 21 million

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States

--------

Ex Convicts

CA: NO

AUS: YES

Douche Ranking

CA: 1st

AUS: Probably last

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

THey don't explain the difference for you because you refuse to even listen. Typical BY. The excuses as you call them are facts that refudiate your opinion. See what he did there?

:lol: Dan stated crime has something to do with population density. I then rebutted saying that a large number of countries with a higher population density than the US, actually have lower crime rates. Aka not correlated to population density alone. I have posted the data before and not going to post it again.

Edited by Booyah!

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

There are places with higher population densities that do have lower crime rates, but usually that is due to two reasons, better social programs to take care of the countries poor population, or two the rate is in a developing country where the public safety infrastructure is lacking or corrupt resulting in an under reporting of crime.

keTiiDCjGVo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

THey don't explain the difference for you because you refuse to even listen. Typical BY. The excuses as you call them are facts that refudiate your opinion. See what he did there?

There still has yet to be proof of Lou Dobbs being a racist.

Try watching his show sometime. You can watch archives, or wait until he's on Fox. He's normally very even handed, but when it comes to Mexicans, 'ol Lou gets all rabid and has to show his complete disdain for all hispanics.

Again "do your homework" along with no proof.

But then again, you never ever back up what you say. Because you can't.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

THey don't explain the difference for you because you refuse to even listen. Typical BY. The excuses as you call them are facts that refudiate your opinion. See what he did there?

:lol: Dan stated crime has something to do with population density. I then rebutted saying that a large number of countries with a higher population density than the US, actually have lower crime rates. Aka not correlated to population density alone.

Ah yes, but once again, you've taken someone elses facts and intertwined your opinion and trying to pass it off as facts. The fact is you can't simply apply population and crime rates from one country to the U.S.. It just doesn't work because there are so many other factors at play. You are making the simpleton analysis to try to apply that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are places with higher population densities that do have lower crime rates, but usually that is due to two reasons, better social programs to take care of the countries poor population, or two the rate is in a developing country where the public safety infrastructure is lacking or corrupt resulting in an under reporting of crime.

What explains the crime in areas of America that have a low population density? LA alone is hardly a metropolis filled with skyscrapers.

The fact is when compared to most other first world countries, the US has one of the worst crime rates. How can you sit there and deny that?

Then again, it's the same reason people sit here and flat-out deny that aesthetically, the US is probably one of the worst looking first world countries. Not to metion, also has some of the poorest infrastructure. Denial seems to be rooted deep in the country's psyche.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Wait, your comparing a high density urban area with a low density country? Apples and Oranges dude.

If you want to compare:

US is 5.6 Homicides per 100,000 Which is still kinda of high, but when you take it into perspective with population density with the US has 76 people per square mile and AUS has 6.4 people per square mile Its not all that dramatic.

We have been down this road before Dan. Countries with even higher density than the US have even lower crime rates; with some lower than Australia. Neither population density nor socioeconomic status can explain the difference in crime.

Why do people insist on making excuses (or downplaying) for all of the country's perils? That is, rather than actually tackling them. In the end these excuses solve nothing, as they have solved nothing.

THey don't explain the difference for you because you refuse to even listen. Typical BY. The excuses as you call them are facts that refudiate your opinion. See what he did there?

There still has yet to be proof of Lou Dobbs being a racist.

Try watching his show sometime. You can watch archives, or wait until he's on Fox. He's normally very even handed, but when it comes to Mexicans, 'ol Lou gets all rabid and has to show his complete disdain for all hispanics.

Again "do your homework" along with no proof.

But then again, you never ever back up what you say. Because you can't.

You're half right Joe. I'm at work, and my employers block all streaming video, even already embedded video. So no, I can't post videos on here. That is why I told you to go watch the archives of his show. That's the best I can do with limited resources here at work. It wasn't intended as a "do your homework" statment, more of a direction to where you can obtain the information yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
There are places with higher population densities that do have lower crime rates, but usually that is due to two reasons, better social programs to take care of the countries poor population, or two the rate is in a developing country where the public safety infrastructure is lacking or corrupt resulting in an under reporting of crime.

What explains the crime in areas of America that have a low population density? LA alone is hardly a metropolis filled with skyscrapers.

The fact is when compared to most other first world countries, the US has one of the worst crime rates. How can you sit there and deny that?

Then again, it's the same reason people sit here and flat-out deny that aesthetically, the US is probably one of the worst looking first world countries. Not to metion, also has some of the poorest infrastructure. Denial seems to be rooted deep in the country's psyche.

And yet billions are spent on "infrastructure" grants that never make it to fruition.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...