Posting grievances publicly

[Mags 112]

I agree. I don't trust the postal service.

[missmissy 38]

I agree with Len. Lots of bad advice being given in the upper forums.

[SMOKE 1,426]

[Chica Yeyé 41]

SMOKE...

[rebeccajo 14]

SMOKE...

LOLOL.........it is funneh!

[Chica Yeyé 41]

SMOKE...

LOLOL.........it is funneh!

Reminds me of my Etymology Professor... once he actually walked in the lecture hall, took his hat off, put it back on and walked away

[mox 298]

The lack of moderator response is neither surprising nor desirable, since I would really only expect to get the Michael Scott version of "we take your concerns srsly" answer anyway. (having said that, I would *welcome* with open tentacles an actual non-party-line response and constructive follow-on dialog, but then I would also welcome an actual leprechaun in me Lucky Charms...personally I think the odds are in favor of the leprechaun.)

I agree with RJ (and I don't do that often, organizationally anyway) that the upper forums need help BADLY (and this has been pointed out over and over and over for many many months, with many many promises of change), but the real intent of my post is that there needs to be a real and viable conduit for members to make themselves heard. If that is publicly in this forum, then so be it. But if the moderation team are going to insist that we take complaints offline, then they need to do more than just brush us off with canned responses and snarky remarks.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

I concur. And I agree that what we are looking for is not moderator response in this thread. We -I- are looking to hear from the furry one.

The upper forums are in disarray. And a few folks have what it takes to give advise, to the point and without unicorns and rainbows, and they are shut down. and no, I am not talking about me.

[rebeccajo 14]

The lack of moderator response is neither surprising nor desirable, since I would really only expect to get the Michael Scott version of "we take your concerns srsly" answer anyway. (having said that, I would *welcome* with open tentacles an actual non-party-line response and constructive follow-on dialog, but then I would also welcome an actual leprechaun in me Lucky Charms...personally I think the odds are in favor of the leprechaun.)

I agree with RJ (and I don't do that often, organizationally anyway) that the upper forums need help BADLY (and this has been pointed out over and over and over for many many months, with many many promises of change), but the real intent of my post is that there needs to be a real and viable conduit for members to make themselves heard. If that is publicly in this forum, then so be it. But if the moderation team are going to insist that we take complaints offline, then they need to do more than just brush us off with canned responses and snarky remarks.

Snarky remarks?

Well, that never happens!!

[Chica Yeyé 41]

[john & jean 37]

:angry: THE UPPER FORUMS HAVE BEEN IN DISARRAY EVER SINCE THE NOOBS THREAD WAS CLOSED :angry:

[Chica Yeyé 41]

:angry: THE UPPER FORUMS HAVE BEEN IN DISARRAY EVER SINCE THE NOOBS THREAD WAS CLOSED :angry:

Edited to add: kind of true. As smug as we were; we were able to send out the people that knew the answers to the upper forums.

Edited November 12, 2009 by *Len*

[Mags 112]

Is no one going to address the issue about the postal service, either? It's incredibly important to us Brits.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Is no one going to address the issue about the postal service, either? It's incredibly important to us Brits.

You are on hold... your call is important to us; please remain on the line....

[Usui Takumi 1,562]

Is no one going to address the issue about the postal service, either? It's incredibly important to us Brits.

Is it? I'd rather hand deliver my mail then trust Royal Mail lol.