Murdoch: "We are better" than those clowns at the BBC

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Independent broadcasters might disagree with you there - in radio especially.

If competition exists, there is no monopoly. Basic definitional stuff. Something all pro-liberty individuals understand.

[Tahoma 2,292]

In terms of content absolutely there are - but business guys like Murdoch aren't interested in qualitative content analysis.

Well you're a collectivist librul and the BBC pushes a collectivist librul ideology. Figures you'd think it's better. But freedom loving people like Murdoch know better.

and the teabaggers..

...and the birtherz know better too!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Recent changes to FCC regulations make it very virtually impossible for independent broadcasters to compete. This isn't a new thing - it's been going on for several years.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Recent changes to FCC regulations make it very virtually impossible for independent broadcasters to compete. This isn't a new thing - it's been going on for several years.

And yet, competition exists. The pro-freedom, anti-collectivist agenda wins again.

ps. being a conservative is so easy.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It only exists in the sense that they can say it does, when in real practical terms it doesn't.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

It only exists in the sense that they can say it does, when in real practical terms it doesn't.

Competition either exists or it doesn't.

Do advertisers have a choice of networks to advertise in? Yes.

Do viewers have a choice of networks to view? Yes.

Are the networks in existence sufficiently different? Yes.

How does competition not exist?

[Tahoma 2,292]

Recent changes to FCC regulations make it very virtually impossible for independent broadcasters to compete. This isn't a new thing - it's been going on for several years.

And yet, competition exists. The pro-freedom, anti-collectivist agenda wins again.

ps. being a conservative is so easy.

Spoken like a true oligopolist!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It exists only between a handful of multinational media conglomerates.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

It exists only between a handful of multinational media conglomerates.

So you admit it exists.

[Tahoma 2,292]

It exists only between a handful of multinational media conglomerates.

So you admit it exists.

Maybe you're right. Sometimes I can't decide what to watch between all of those shopping channels and all of those televangelists.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

It exists only between a handful of multinational media conglomerates.

So you admit it exists.

Maybe you're right. Sometimes I can't decide what to watch between all of those shopping channels and all of those televangelists.

Or, if you're in the mood for politics, Maddow or Hannity. No competition? Get the fuсk outta here.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I watched Fox last night and was amazed by the level of "debate" on the Bill O'Reilly show - the 3 way discussion between O'Reilly and a couple of "contributors".

Shallow - is putting it mildly.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I watched Fox last night...

Sir, have you gone mad?

[Tahoma 2,292]

It exists only between a handful of multinational media conglomerates.

So you admit it exists.

Maybe you're right. Sometimes I can't decide what to watch between all of those shopping channels and all of those televangelists.

Or, if you're in the mood for politics, Maddow or Hannity. No competition? Get the fuсk outta here.

Faux or MSNBC? Now you're down to two competitors. Some "competition!"

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

It exists only between a handful of multinational media conglomerates.

So you admit it exists.

Maybe you're right. Sometimes I can't decide what to watch between all of those shopping channels and all of those televangelists.

Or, if you're in the mood for politics, Maddow or Hannity. No competition? Get the fuсk outta here.

Faux or MSNBC? Now you're down to two competitors. Some "competition!"

Let's not forget CNN, where it's all about what their viewers are telling them on Twitter. Just sayin.