Jump to content
pony1076

K-3 questions

 Share

20 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showforum=93

Yes we did the CR-1. We seriously considered the K-3 but are SO happy we didn't go through with it. Like I said, only if you will interview in Vancouver is the K-3 beneficial as it is significantly shorter wait time than interviewing in Montreal, where in Canada are you from?

I am from Windsor, Ontario.

Met online May 2004

Met in person October 2004

Married February 16, 2010

Submitted I-130 February 22, 2010

NOA 1 March 3, 2010

Touched March 8, 2010

Touched June, 28,2010

RFE June 30, 2010

RFE sent in July 16,2010

RFE received in California July 19, 2010

NOA 2 July 28, 2010

NVC received case file August 3, 2010

NVC case number August 4, 2010

Emailed DS-3032 and opted in for Email filing August 5, 2010

Called NVC to give email addys August 6, 2010

Optin Accepted August 6, 2010

Paid AOS bill August 12, 2010

Emailed DS-3032 and opted in for Email filing August 5, 2010

Received AOS bill August 12, 2010

Paid AOS bill August 12, 2010

Emailed DS-230 September 24, 2010

Emailed I-864 October 2, 2010

NVC SIF & Approval October 13, 2010

Medical Toronto January 24, 2011

Interview February 14, 2011

P.O.E. Ambassador Bridge, Detroit, February 24, 2011

Biometrics Appointment ?? March 22, 2011

Went to Social Security to find out about card to find out nonexistant March 23,2011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

Then yes, go for the CR-1 and you'll interivew in Montreal (sadly, it's incredibly slow at scheduling interviews) but the K-3 will certianly not benefit you at all

Good luck.

USCIS
August 12, 2008 - petition sent
August 16, 2008 - NOA-1
February 10, 2009 - NOA-2
178 DAYS FROM NOA-1


NVC
February 13, 2009 - NVC case number assigned
March 12, 2009 - Case Complete
25 DAY TRIP THROUGH NVC


Medical
May 4, 2009


Interview
May, 26, 2009


POE - June 20, 2009 Toronto - Atlanta, GA

Removal of Conditions
Filed - April 14, 2011
Biometrics - June 2, 2011 (early)
Approval - November 9, 2011
209 DAY TRIP TO REMOVE CONDITIONS

Citizenship

April 29, 2013 - NOA1 for petition received

September 10, 2013 Interview - decision could not be made.

April 15, 2014 APPROVED. Wait for oath ceremony

Waited...

September 29, 2015 - sent letter to senator.

October 16, 2015 - US Citizen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Then yes, go for the CR-1 and you'll interivew in Montreal (sadly, it's incredibly slow at scheduling interviews) but the K-3 will certianly not benefit you at all

Good luck.

I'm optimistic for those who use the new NVC elecronic processing available for Montreal cases but don't know of any who have completed the process yet.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

k3 is much better than cr1.. its faster than cr1 but there are difference between k3 and cr1. and its quite expensive than cr1..

we are in k3...read the guide it will help you.

goodluck on your journey..

marianne

K3 is no longer faster. It's just more expensive. CR1 results in the immigrant having work authorization upon US entry.

When I look at the interviews scheduled for K3 and IR1/CR1 on the Chennai (India)) US consulate site the receipt numbers for K3 are having an earlier dates for interview than the IR1/CR1. They have the interview schedule along with the receipt number on the website there. They are on the Chennai consulate site.

For a lot of people even saving 1 month is a lot more important than spending a few thousand dollars extra down the road or not having the work authorization immediately. I am still in the process I cant exactly say what is faster from my personal experience at this point but even if it would save me a few weeks I would gladly do K3 over Ir1/CR1. For me I just want to be with my wife as soon as possible do I dont have to go through the stress of separation.

Yes, I totally agree with you. If I could go back, I would never change to CR1. K3 worked for us, as it brought us closer about 3 months sooner than the CR1. Separation was the worst and very painful. If money is not an issue for you, go with K3. Much faster. If it is not faster, why does USCIS still have it available? Just for the money? I don't think so.

4.28.07 - Married in Jalisco Mexico - Cozumel Honeymoon for 2 weeks

***I-130***

5.24.07 - I-130 Received in CSC

7.14.07 - Received NOA1 (WOW after 6 weeks, I was worried...called INS and told me CSC had a computer "glitch" causing delays on printing Receipt notices and approvals)

10.30.07 - APPROVED No email, the NOA2 came in the mail...hard copy.

***1-129F***

7.23.07 - I-129F received in Chicago

7.30.07 - Received NOA1

11.21.07 - APPROVED!!!! APPROVED. GOT AN E-MAIL ON THANKSGIVING!

03.03.08- INTERVIEW IN CIUDAD JUAREZ. VISA GRANTED ON 03.03.2008

***AOS & EAD***

3.10.08 - Case Received at Chicago Lockbox, check cashed 3.14.08

3.17.08 - Received both NOA's in the mail

3.21.08 - Received Biometrics appointment letter in the mail, biometrics Appt. 4.02.08

5.05.08 - EAD Card Production ordered GOT EMAIL (we received the same email on 5.09.08)

5.13.08 - Approval Email for EAD (so the card was ordered first, and then we were approved...hum)

5.15.08 - EAD Card Received in mail.

8.08.08 - WE GOT OUR INTERVIEW APPOINTMENT YAY...9/12/08 - INTERVIEW APPROVED

9.24.08 - Received Green Card in the mail YEAH!

***I-751***

6.15.10 - Mailed I-751 Docs to CSC, check cashed 6.24.10

6.26.10 - Received NOA in mail dated 6.21.10

6.29.10 - Received Biometrics appointment for 7.15.10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
k3 is much better than cr1.. its faster than cr1 but there are difference between k3 and cr1. and its quite expensive than cr1..

we are in k3...read the guide it will help you.

goodluck on your journey..

marianne

K3 is no longer faster. It's just more expensive. CR1 results in the immigrant having work authorization upon US entry.

When I look at the interviews scheduled for K3 and IR1/CR1 on the Chennai (India)) US consulate site the receipt numbers for K3 are having an earlier dates for interview than the IR1/CR1. They have the interview schedule along with the receipt number on the website there. They are on the Chennai consulate site.

For a lot of people even saving 1 month is a lot more important than spending a few thousand dollars extra down the road or not having the work authorization immediately. I am still in the process I cant exactly say what is faster from my personal experience at this point but even if it would save me a few weeks I would gladly do K3 over Ir1/CR1. For me I just want to be with my wife as soon as possible do I dont have to go through the stress of separation.

Yes, I totally agree with you. If I could go back, I would never change to CR1. K3 worked for us, as it brought us closer about 3 months sooner than the CR1. Separation was the worst and very painful. If money is not an issue for you, go with K3. Much faster. If it is not faster, why does USCIS still have it available? Just for the money? I don't think so.

USCIS still has K3 avialable for several reasons, but mainly as a requirment of law (The Life Act). K3 is faster through a few consulates but it is also a good option for couples who don't intend for the foreign spouse to maintain permanent resident status in the USA right away. Bordertown relationships are an example when the Canadian needs to keep their job in Canada for a while.

Government agencies don't operate on a profit motive. :thumbs:

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...