platy for mods

[spookyturtle 9,466]

well, i have toa gree.. as rogue was brother marc name here...and i assume you did it out of disrespect to my seattle brother...just saying

Absolutely. But since when is it a TOS violation to impersonate someone from another forum? Suppose I join a car forum and pretend I am Charles? Would that be grounds for being bannned?

excellent point brother spooky..or should i say..spooky, attorney

If necessary, I may have to take it to the Supreme Court. And I just may join a car forum and pretend I am Charles.

[PlatyPius 5]

well, i have toa gree.. as rogue was brother marc name here...and i assume you did it out of disrespect to my seattle brother...just saying

Absolutely. But since when is it a TOS violation to impersonate someone from another forum? Suppose I join a car forum and pretend I am Charles? Would that be grounds for being bannned?

excellent point brother spooky..or should i say..spooky, attorney

If necessary, I may have to take it to the Supreme Court. And I just may join a car forum and pretend I am Charles.

I vaguely remember that.... you were giving Marc a worse name than he already has, which was the problem. If someone wants to join as another name (for instance, I was "Lal" on EP), that's one thing, as long as it is obvious you aren't really that person. But to use that persona in a manner which might injure the person impersonated is the tipping point.

Not that I didn't find it funny....

(Sorry to be getting all mod-ish on a forum I don't moderate. )

[spookyturtle 9,466]

well, i have toa gree.. as rogue was brother marc name here...and i assume you did it out of disrespect to my seattle brother...just saying

Absolutely. But since when is it a TOS violation to impersonate someone from another forum? Suppose I join a car forum and pretend I am Charles? Would that be grounds for being bannned?

excellent point brother spooky..or should i say..spooky, attorney

If necessary, I may have to take it to the Supreme Court. And I just may join a car forum and pretend I am Charles.

I vaguely remember that.... you were giving Marc a worse name than he already has, which was the problem. If someone wants to join as another name (for instance, I was "Lal" on EP), that's one thing, as long as it is obvious you aren't really that person. But to use that persona in a manner which might injure the person impersonated is the tipping point.

Not that I didn't find it funny....

(Sorry to be getting all mod-ish on a forum I don't moderate. )

It was done with the intent of good fun. And I thought I was clearly showing that I was an imposter. It's ok, I'm almost over it.

[PlatyPius 5]

well, i have toa gree.. as rogue was brother marc name here...and i assume you did it out of disrespect to my seattle brother...just saying

Absolutely. But since when is it a TOS violation to impersonate someone from another forum? Suppose I join a car forum and pretend I am Charles? Would that be grounds for being bannned?

excellent point brother spooky..or should i say..spooky, attorney

If necessary, I may have to take it to the Supreme Court. And I just may join a car forum and pretend I am Charles.

I vaguely remember that.... you were giving Marc a worse name than he already has, which was the problem. If someone wants to join as another name (for instance, I was "Lal" on EP), that's one thing, as long as it is obvious you aren't really that person. But to use that persona in a manner which might injure the person impersonated is the tipping point.

Not that I didn't find it funny....

(Sorry to be getting all mod-ish on a forum I don't moderate. )

It was done with the intent of good fun. And I thought I was clearly showing that I was an imposter. It's ok, I'm almost over it.

To be honest, I don't remember the details. At all.

It might have been an all-mod decision, or Marc might have PM'd me asking for me to look at it. It's possible I just did it myself, but I doubt it. I remember the incident, but I don't even remember actually banning you myself.

Did I use the words "d0uchebag", "kangaroo", or "goat-fellator" in the email/PM?

[Chica Yeyé 41]

#######... why is Marc more worthy of impersonation than I am??? This is sad.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

well, i have toa gree.. as rogue was brother marc name here...and i assume you did it out of disrespect to my seattle brother...just saying

Absolutely. But since when is it a TOS violation to impersonate someone from another forum? Suppose I join a car forum and pretend I am Charles? Would that be grounds for being bannned?

excellent point brother spooky..or should i say..spooky, attorney

If necessary, I may have to take it to the Supreme Court. And I just may join a car forum and pretend I am Charles.

I vaguely remember that.... you were giving Marc a worse name than he already has, which was the problem. If someone wants to join as another name (for instance, I was "Lal" on EP), that's one thing, as long as it is obvious you aren't really that person. But to use that persona in a manner which might injure the person impersonated is the tipping point.

Not that I didn't find it funny....

(Sorry to be getting all mod-ish on a forum I don't moderate. )

It was done with the intent of good fun. And I thought I was clearly showing that I was an imposter. It's ok, I'm almost over it.

To be honest, I don't remember the details. At all.

It might have been an all-mod decision, or Marc might have PM'd me asking for me to look at it. It's possible I just did it myself, but I doubt it. I remember the incident, but I don't even remember actually banning you myself.

Did I use the words "d0uchebag", "kangaroo", or "goat-fellator" in the email/PM?

Nope. It was an email, no warning or PM.

[PlatyPius 5]

well, i have toa gree.. as rogue was brother marc name here...and i assume you did it out of disrespect to my seattle brother...just saying

Absolutely. But since when is it a TOS violation to impersonate someone from another forum? Suppose I join a car forum and pretend I am Charles? Would that be grounds for being bannned?

excellent point brother spooky..or should i say..spooky, attorney

If necessary, I may have to take it to the Supreme Court. And I just may join a car forum and pretend I am Charles.

I vaguely remember that.... you were giving Marc a worse name than he already has, which was the problem. If someone wants to join as another name (for instance, I was "Lal" on EP), that's one thing, as long as it is obvious you aren't really that person. But to use that persona in a manner which might injure the person impersonated is the tipping point.

Not that I didn't find it funny....

(Sorry to be getting all mod-ish on a forum I don't moderate. )

It was done with the intent of good fun. And I thought I was clearly showing that I was an imposter. It's ok, I'm almost over it.

To be honest, I don't remember the details. At all.

It might have been an all-mod decision, or Marc might have PM'd me asking for me to look at it. It's possible I just did it myself, but I doubt it. I remember the incident, but I don't even remember actually banning you myself.

Did I use the words "d0uchebag", "kangaroo", or "goat-fellator" in the email/PM?

Nope. It was an email, no warning or PM.

Well, I apologize if it has caused you to sit in alleyways sobbing uncontrollably.

In other modding news, I see that the VJ Gestapo has post-emptively banned Eric's closed account. w00t! I imagine there's nothing like getting an email accusing you of sneaking in again with a closed account that hasn't been used in months. Sweet!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

In other modding news, I see that the VJ Gestapo has post-emptively banned Eric's closed account. w00t! I imagine there's nothing like getting an email accusing you of sneaking in again with a closed account that hasn't been used in months. Sweet!

[natty bumppo 297]

In other modding news, I see that the VJ Gestapo has post-emptively banned Eric's closed account. w00t! I imagine there's nothing like getting an email accusing you of sneaking in again with a closed account that hasn't been used in months. Sweet!

meanwhile ... the doc offers eric a discounted rate .......

[Welshcookie 17]

Well, I apologize if it has caused you to sit in alleyways sobbing uncontrollably.

In other modding news, I see that the VJ Gestapo has post-emptively banned Eric's closed account. w00t! I imagine there's nothing like getting an email accusing you of sneaking in again with a closed account that hasn't been used in months. Sweet!

That is pretty funny i must admit

[natty bumppo 297]

platy for mod ..... about fvcking time ....

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Well, I apologize if it has caused you to sit in alleyways sobbing uncontrollably.

It was the 6 months of therapy and shock treatment that I resented. Even Eric never got banned from Expats. I felt worthless.

[PlatyPius 5]

Well, I apologize if it has caused you to sit in alleyways sobbing uncontrollably.

It was the 6 months of therapy and shock treatment that I resented. Even Eric never got banned from Expats. I felt worthless.

Eric was banned from Expats about 839 times. Unfortunately, he's not as much of a moron as everyone thinks, so he kept showing up with new IP addresses. He's "unbannable". That's why he's still there.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Well, I apologize if it has caused you to sit in alleyways sobbing uncontrollably.

It was the 6 months of therapy and shock treatment that I resented. Even Eric never got banned from Expats. I felt worthless.

Eric was banned from Expats about 839 times. Unfortunately, he's not as much of a moron as everyone thinks, so he kept showing up with new IP addresses. He's "unbannable". That's why he's still there.

But isn't the grammar a dead giveaway?

[Marilyn. 340]

Well, I apologize if it has caused you to sit in alleyways sobbing uncontrollably.

It was the 6 months of therapy and shock treatment that I resented. Even Eric never got banned from Expats. I felt worthless.

Eric was banned from Expats about 839 times. Unfortunately, he's not as much of a moron as everyone thinks, so he kept showing up with new IP addresses. He's "unbannable". That's why he's still there.

But isn't the grammar a dead giveaway?

I think he means that he can't permanently ban him