Is this racist?

[mawilson 2,133]

Right wing thugs like to pretend any opposition to their fascist philosophy is anti-white.

The same race card is used by Obamabots.

"If you disagree with the President, you must be racist."

[Peikko 1,575]

Right wing thugs like to pretend any opposition to their fascist philosophy is anti-white.

The same race card is used by Obamabots.

"If you disagree with the President, you must be racist."

That is done too. Both scenarios are equally ridiculous.

[Heracles 417]

You are now claiming you acted as if 'drunk'? Curiouser and curiouser. BY, the simple fact is that you made a racist statement which you continue to believe is 'justifiable' because of your failure to understand that the statistical data you presented as an explanation of what led to your statement simply does not mean what you think it means.

That statement was a shot at the hip smart azz comment. That statement alone does not change any of the other facts posted. Like many, here you guys fail to see past those comments and they remain the center of your attention in every one of your arguments.

The same way no matter what Bill O'reilly states, to pike he's an idiot. How do you discuss anything with some who has such an attitude? Every discussion I enter into I treat those that I am posting with as a new face. I don't regurgitate things they have said 3 years ago and disingenuously use it to discredit what they are saying now. Not to mention, I also don't grasp for straws using a handful of words they said and try to hold this against them. Such approaches in an essay or a debate would result in a fail in any high end college.

Unlike yourself or Pikey, I adjust my stance based on the facts. For example, if you demonstrated that Aussie americans were a large percentage of animal abuses, I would accept it and want to fix it. I most definitely would not pull a "how dare you say that about Aussies!.

Edited October 21, 2009 by Booyah!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Your opinions on this subject are consistent - and its the only thing you appear passionate about in discussing here (that and Australia's international awards).

I don't think anyone would see it as a stretch that all of these threads are merely extensions of the same argument that's been going back and forth for a couple of years - so why you expect one dodgy statement to stand in complete isolation from any other is a bit of a mystery.

Edited October 21, 2009 by Gene Hunt

[Heracles 417]

I don't think anyone would see it as a stretch that all of these threads are merely extensions of the same argument that's been going back and forth for a couple of years - so why you expect one dodgy statement to stand in complete isolation from any other is a bit of a mystery.

This coming from the guy who wrote off Bill O'reilly just because of the "A F-ck it!" clip. Where did you get your bachelors from again and in what?

Your opinions on this subject are consistent - and its the only thing you appear passionate about in discussing here (that and Australia's international awards).

Australians tend to get like that when people's lives are at stake. Or someones reputation is at stake, just because they suggested a minority looks like a famous minority supreme court judge. Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

People say I look like Lorenzo Lamas. OMFG that is just racist.

Edited October 21, 2009 by Booyah!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

Preserved for posterity.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't think anyone would see it as a stretch that all of these threads are merely extensions of the same argument that's been going back and forth for a couple of years - so why you expect one dodgy statement to stand in complete isolation from any other is a bit of a mystery.

This coming from the guy who wrote off Bill O'reilly just because of the "A F-ck it!" clip. Where did you get your bachelors from again and in what?

No, I wrote off O'Reilly before that. I got a few laughs out of that video though.

I don't see what it has to do with what I wrote above BTW.

Your opinions on this subject are consistent - and its the only thing you appear passionate about in discussing here (that and Australia's international awards).

Australians tend to get like that when people's lives are at stake or someones reputation is at stake, just because they suggested a minority looks like a famous judge. Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

BY - this entire tangent is one that you started. Its the same one that you start over and over and over again in any thread where there is even the subtlest hint of race politics.

Your arguments are the same, the flaws in those arguments are the same.

[Heracles 417]

Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

Preserved for posterity.

What other solution is there? Should we all walk on egg shells to ensure asking a minority to pass over the ketchup is not treating them as a slave.

Not going to happen and I will sue the #### out any yank company that challenges me. Now that the dollar is nearly on parity, I have a few mill to spare for lawyer fees.

Edited October 21, 2009 by Booyah!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

Preserved for posterity.

What other solution is there? Should we all walk on egg shells to ensure asking a minority to pass over the ketchup is not treating them as a slave.

Not going to happen and I will sue the #### of any yank company that challenges me.

sure you will, little homey. sure you will.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

Preserved for posterity.

Not exactly HR material is he.

[Heracles 417]

BY - this entire tangent is one that you started. Its the same one that you start over and over and over again in any thread where there is even the subtlest hint of race politics.

Your arguments are the same, the flaws in those arguments are the same.

Same accusation made about almost everyone you disagree with:

Danno

Sofia

AlienChild

Josesph

Myself

Rogue

JustShooter

ZQT

I will ask you again, what do you do and what field is your education in?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Don't hire minorities and the problem is solved.

Preserved for posterity.

Not exactly HR material is he.

challenge him and he will sue you with a sawed off shotgun and punch you in the face for good measure and take all your money and put it into his paypal. that'll show you.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

BY - this entire tangent is one that you started. Its the same one that you start over and over and over again in any thread where there is even the subtlest hint of race politics.

Your arguments are the same, the flaws in those arguments are the same.

Same accusation made about almost everyone you disagree with:

Danno

Sofia

AlienChild

Josesph

Myself

Rogue

JustShooter

ZQT

I will ask you again, what do you do and what field is your education in?

No BY its not the same accusation.

*You* (you personally) are obsessed with race politics to the extent that you will insert it into any thread you can, whereever you can.

[Peikko 1,575]

You are now claiming you acted as if 'drunk'? Curiouser and curiouser. BY, the simple fact is that you made a racist statement which you continue to believe is 'justifiable' because of your failure to understand that the statistical data you presented as an explanation of what led to your statement simply does not mean what you think it means.

That statement was a shot at the hip smart azz comment. That statement alone does not change any of the other facts posted. Like many, here you guys fail to see past those comments and they remain the center of your attention in every one of your arguments.

The same way no matter what Bill O'reilly states, to pike he's an idiot. How do you discuss anything with some who has such an attitude? Every discussion I enter into I treat those that I am posting with as a new face. I don't regurgitate things they have said 3 years ago and disingenuously use it to discredit what they are saying now. Not to mention, I also don't grasp for straws using a handful of words they said and try to hold this against them. Such approaches in an essay or a debate would result in a fail in any high end college.

Unlike yourself or Pikey, I adjust my stance based on the facts. For example, if you demonstrated that Aussie americans were a large percentage of animal abuses, I would accept it and want to fix it. I most definitely would not pull a "how dare you say that about Aussies!.

Which is all very laudable but as I said before, unless you understood why the numbers of Aussie abusers were high you wouldn't stand a chance at being able to fix it. What you do is interpret the statistics to conclude that because a significant portion of Aussies are animal abusers the most effective fix is to treat all Aussies as though they were animal abusers. Are you beginning to see where you are going wrong yet?

Edited October 21, 2009 by Madame Cleo

[Heracles 417]

sure you will, little homey. sure you will.

Little homey?

You're the Indian and I am certainly the polar opposite to some low life monority gang banger.