Regional Forums Moderator: Charles!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Some others from a very quick archive search - all from the last couple of months:

The point about guns is they are designed to kill and to kill from a measured distance from the target so that the shooter can remain safe and sound. They are great weapons, that's why all armed forces use them, rather than plastic bags, sedans or bricks.

A gun can kill hundreds of people within an hour. No one is going to get a car and repeatedly run over hundreds of people. Let alone kill hundreds of people with a brick.

That line of reasoning from some is just so third worldish. A gun has one purpose and one purpose alone, to kill. It can do so in a short amount of time and most people, include a navy seal like Charles, have little to do to stop a bullet heading towards them. Hence why they are controlled in every other developed country. Excluding the third world of course, which some clearly have no issue being classed with.

The other thing people do not account for is that they think they have a chance to defend themselves if they are armed. Okay fine. So what if a group of people holding guns approaches a person or breaks into a house. Or is this John Wayne gun owner Singlehandedly going to take them all down?

inaccurate - the mere presence of a gun can deter a crime from being committed.

Accurate - he is talking about the purpose in terms of design. The design of a gun is not to act as a deterent by looking menacing. The design of a gun is to kill, period and another of your specious arguments to try to pretend that guns are something that they are not. Why you don't want to own up to the idea is bizarre to say the least. Are you afraid of something Charles? What is this fear?

i'm afraid you don't have a vibrator

I confess though, I have never tried a mechanical version so I don't know what I might, or might not be missing.

You've never used a #######?

she's sexuallly repressed.

Oh joy the 'you are wrong because I say so even though I cant actually provide any counter argument to any of the points you raised' post. Brilliant work Charles, way too go.

given you probably don't know half the time which end of the gun to hold when firing it, we don't pay much attention to what you have to offer in discussions like these.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Sounds like he's being jokey.

Unless you guys object to the kind of jokes he cracks, I don't see the point.

If it's his sense of humor y'all have a problem with, say so. And tell us why.

[LaL 418]

No. Its that he brings ####### to this forum on a regular basis, and exhibits no remorse when he offends others. If he were true mod material he would have tried to calm the situation rather than pour oil on a fire. He cannot even moderate himself. How can we possibly expect him to moderate others, particularly when he shows no regard for fellow members.

Can we go back to that post you pasted? Where, specifically, is the problem? He clearly wasn't intending to upset MC, so why is remorse expected?

idk dude - *I* get mighty pissed off when he tells me to unwad my panties. I think it's really crude regardless if he claims it's just teasing.

[mox 298]

Sounds like he's being jokey.

Unless you guys object to the kind of jokes he cracks, I don't see the point.

If it's his sense of humor y'all have a problem with, say so. And tell us why.

As always, I'm speaking for myself. My objection isn't with his sense of humor.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

No. Its that he brings ####### to this forum on a regular basis, and exhibits no remorse when he offends others. If he were true mod material he would have tried to calm the situation rather than pour oil on a fire. He cannot even moderate himself. How can we possibly expect him to moderate others, particularly when he shows no regard for fellow members.

Can we go back to that post you pasted? Where, specifically, is the problem? He clearly wasn't intending to upset MC, so why is remorse expected?

idk dude - *I* get mighty pissed off when he tells me to unwad my panties. I think it's really crude regardless if he claims it's just teasing.

Why is it crude? It's an expression, the meaning of which is asking you to not be uptight.

What's crude about it?

My objection isn't with his sense of humor.

So it's with the fact that he doesn't write essays?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Sounds like he's being jokey.

Unless you guys object to the kind of jokes he cracks, I don't see the point.

If it's his sense of humor y'all have a problem with, say so. And tell us why.

It doesn't come across as humour.

If you go out of your way to make sexually derogatory comments to another poster that you have a disagreement with, humour it ain't.

At stake is the America of the 1800's

It's sort of funny, but mostly it's pathetic because as Pooky and others have pointed out, it's this very line of thinking, that citizens should do the job more properly reserved for trained professionals, that has had a hand in creating this very violent culture that exists in pockets of America. Would that the rest of it remains outside this frontiersman thinking.

It's called self-reliance. You wouldn't know - they don't teach it in Europe.

that's not part of the raising the white flag class?

As I said, such a reliance on gun possession to prop up one's notion of being in control is both pathetic and immature.

you keep right on thinking that and pray to 911 should the need arise. i'll depend on smith and wesson.

You are not reading what is written, again. Oh, and as you well know, I would never resort to prayer, in any situation.

oh i'm reading it, and i find your stance silly and uninformed. i go to sleep at night knowing that i'm able to defend myself. you, on the other hand, need a telephone and about 30 minutes.

As you clearly do not understand what I say, finding it silly and uninformed is moot. I go to sleep at night without worrying about being attacked at all. Who knew?

perhaps you should try a little makeup and perfume then

[mox 298]

My objection isn't with his sense of humor.

So it's with the fact that he doesn't write essays?

I've laid my objections out about as clear as I can. If you're getting "he doesn't write essays" then I can't help you.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Sounds to me like a good argument for disallowing Charles to moderate MC, more than an argument for him to not be mod at all. Other similar restrictions do exist.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

How many examples are needed before it becomes clear that its a consistent pattern of behaviour?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

They're all targeted at the same person.

I see it as a problem between the two of them.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

They're all targeted at the same person.

I see it as a problem between the two of them.

Your devil's advocate has a short memory, AJ

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

They're all targeted at the same person.

I see it as a problem between the two of them.

Your devil's advocate has a short memory, AJ

I was in the search engine. Plenty of devilette history there. Lots of panty wadding

[mox 298]

I was in the search engine. Plenty of devilette history there. Lots of panty wadding

Devilette isn't being made a mod.

[*julez* 124]

Which is further evidence that he has a long history of inappropriate interactions with members and is therefore unqualified to be an impartial moderator.

[Ban Hammer 13,348]

That's not what I had in mind. I am suspending the experiment.

Charles, really, do you and those other twerps really have to bring Eric into every thread? I don't respond to anything he says on 'the other board' and I really don't want to see references to his idiocy here, if at all possible.

if you have a real problem with it, take it up with the mods. otherwise, take your whiney too tight panties problem down the hall to someone who cares.

A very recent example of Charles's maturity level and illustrates why he is such a poor choice for the moderation team.

ah yes, let's ignore the insult of "...you and those other twerps..." contained within while you're at it.

perhaps one of the mods could make visible your last personal attack on me and which resulted in your suspension, all to further put your opinion into perspective?

Sounds like he's being jokey.

Unless you guys object to the kind of jokes he cracks, I don't see the point.

If it's his sense of humor y'all have a problem with, say so. And tell us why.

It doesn't come across as humour.

If you go out of your way to make sexually derogatory comments to another poster that you have a disagreement with, humour it ain't.

so we should stick to making observations about someone's (marc) alleged drinking instead?