Jump to content
w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r

Sen. Snowe: Death panel talk was stunning, insurance company practices are egregious

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Ezra Klein - An Interview with Senator Olympia Snowe

When Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) became the first congressional Republican to cast a vote for health-care reform, she also became the most influential Republican on health-care reform. Keeping her vote is a priority for Senate majority leader Harry Reid. "He is prepared to do what he can to keep her on board,” said Reid spokesperson Jim Manley. I spoke with Snowe on Thursday about the death of bipartisanship, the argument for a trigger, and the need for health-care reform to deliver benefits before 2013. A lightly edited transcript of our conversation follows.

...

Was it strange to turn on the TV in August and hear Glenn Beck going on about death panels?

I was stunned. And I still am stunned. It’s reflective of the discourse.

...

But Medicare and Social Security were much more radical than anything we’re discussing now, much more liberal, and they still had much more bipartisan support. That suggests to me we’re dealing with a different political system, or a different moment in the country.

Unfortunately, the political system today preys more on people’s fears than their hopes. It’s all about winning or losing rather than fashioning the right type of approach to a serious problem that cannot be deferred into the future. We have an impending crisis and we can’t seem to muster the political capacity or will to forge political consensus.

...

You’ve been supporting a trigger proposal that would bring a public option into being if insurance didn’t prove affordable over the next few years. Why wait?

We need a lever to force industry to drive down prices. If the goal of the public option is to ensure the industry performs, then the same could be true of a trigger mechanism. That lever could be equally potent in providing the maximum incentive to the industry to perform. The CBO has said we’d realize $15 billion in savings. I think that would be preferable to giving a disproportionate advantage to government.

...

What’s the single idea you’d most like to see in the bill but that you don’t think is politically feasible?

That’s a good question. You mean politically feasible?

Yeah. Like single-payer, for some people, or Wyden-Bennett for others. A big idea you’d like to see included but is currently outside the range of discussion.

I don’t know that I have anything in that category. I believe we should build upon the current system. We don’t want to disrupt that. I’m traditional in my approach towards reforming health care. Given the size and the amount of money we spend on it, I think it would be far too disruptive to upend the system. I think it’s preferable to build on what has worked well in our system and change the egregious practices in the insurance industry. I think the skepticism of that industry has been understandable and I share it, that’s why we really need to look at all facets to ensure they live up to certain standards and perform. But if they don’t, I think a trigger could be a powerful lever in that regard without having the government involved at the outset.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klei...en_olympia.html

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
I believe we should build upon the current system. We don't want to disrupt that. I'm traditional in my approach towards reforming health care. Given the size and the amount of money we spend on it, I think it would be far too disruptive to upend the system. I think it's preferable to build on what has worked well in our system and change the egregious practices in the insurance industry. I think the skepticism of that industry has been understandable and I share it, that's why we really need to look at all facets to ensure they live up to certain standards and perform. But if they don't, I think a trigger could be a powerful lever in that regard without having the government involved at the outset.

Those sentiments are the traditional Conservative approaches toward policy. The Radical Right have tried to redefine what Conservative has meant.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...