here on K-1 and fiancee has HIV

[TracyTN 237]

Well folks, we have a looney here. At 1154 AM yesterday morning, I received the rudest PM message from "Leader" that I have ever received from anyone in my entire life.

The same person subsequently changed their user name from "Leader" to "Loneman" along with a change in his profile gender from Male to Female at 1159 AM.

Someone is trying to cover their tracks and re-invent themselves. The previous posts were suspect to say the least. The OP has not given enough background information to allow anyone to make a fair assessment about the particulars of his situation.

I would not be at all surprised if the fiancee/wife, showed him a bottle of multi-vitamins and said that she was HIV positive in simple defiance, She must have learned of his ulterior motive to skip state, file for AOS and VAWA, and head out for a 2 month trip to PAKISTAN, most likely to visit his REAL girlfriend who he intends to bring to the USA the fastest way he can. His previous posts are evidence of general fishing.

No doubt his level of integrity on this forum is commensurate with his interpersonal dealings with all mankind.

No, it is not OK to willfully withhold material information, including past and ongoing medical conditions from a partner, fiancee, spouse or Immigration.

Negative results from blood work due to pre-marital boom boom 1in the old country may not have shown up at the point of the OP's visa medical exam. That information was not provided. I respect the culture of people of other cultures and am aware and respect of cultural traditions in India and elsewhere, who prohibit pre-marital affairs. The point of asking that question may have eluded to the duration of his assumed exposure and the validity of any test he can take today.

Also, her medications and dosages may possibly determine the status and length of her condition. We do not know when she was diagnosed, or the reason for her having the test to begin with.

HIV is a virus, a common cold is a virus. HIV has the propensity to materialize into AIDS, a common cold can accelerate into utter and complete respiratory failure. The health of individual's immune system becomes that concerning factor.

DaKine: What would I do? Get new tests for both parties at a different clinic using a different lab, wait for the results. If this is the love of my life that we are talking about, then there would be no conscionable decision, other than to stand by that person wholeheartedly without further thought.

Love is blind to fraud and scams. Not everyone learns this the first time around, diba?

Good day to all sports,

NM

Forward the PM to Captain Ewok. Sounds like this nut needs to be banned.

[trinket 30]

Correct me if I am wrong, but while doing research on 1-864 I do remember reading that an HIV positive person can't be sponsor. So how come his wife could sponsor him at the first place.

According to him, wife is taking preventing medications, so that means wife is registered with at least one medical, so that means she is in the database of HIV positive cases; don't you think USCIS or NVC would have caught this while doing background check on the petitioner?

Edited October 19, 2009 by trinket

[TracyTN 237]

Depends on when she registered.

[JERIII 8]

Correct me if I am wrong, but while doing research on 1-864 I do remember reading that an HIV positive person can't be sponsor. So how come his wife could sponsor him at the first place.

According to him, wife is taking preventing medications, so that means wife is registered with at least one medical, so that means she is in the database of HIV positive cases; don't you think USCIS or NVC would have caught this while doing background check on the petitioner?

What database of HIV positive cases?

[trinket 30]

Correct me if I am wrong, but while doing research on 1-864 I do remember reading that an HIV positive person can't be sponsor. So how come his wife could sponsor him at the first place.

According to him, wife is taking preventing medications, so that means wife is registered with at least one medical, so that means she is in the database of HIV positive cases; don't you think USCIS or NVC would have caught this while doing background check on the petitioner?

What database of HIV positive cases?

Shouldn't a hospital keep things in file? With SSN and all. I am not sure how hospital system works exactly out here. My point was if she is HIV positive, how come she got to be a sponsor in the first place.

Depends on when she registered.

I think you are right. Sure will depend upon when she registered herself.

[TracyTN 237]

Shouldn't a hospital keep things in file? With SSN and all. I am not sure how hospital system works exactly out here. My point was if she is HIV positive, how come she got to be a sponsor in the first place.

Depends on when she registered.

I think you are right. Sure will depend upon when she registered herself.

If the beneficiary just now found out, it sounds to me like she has been concealing it.

ETA Aliens are ineligible to receive visas if they have HIV - I don't believe there is a problem if the petitioner has it. Or does anyone know if the USC is required to report it?

Edited October 19, 2009 by TracyTN

[bhajishah 4]

Uh not tellig is malicious and abusive. Im sure if he wanted to press it he could. no problem

[TracyTN 237]

Uh not tellig is malicious and abusive. Im sure if he wanted to press it he could. no problem

Wanted to press what?

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Forward the PM to Captain Ewok. Sounds like this nut needs to be banned.

Sounds like NM has not read the Terms of Service, either my dear sister. Discussing the contents of a PM in the boards is in violation of VJ's terms of service. Reported it has been, as Yoda would say.

[HannahP 119]

Forward the PM to Captain Ewok. Sounds like this nut needs to be banned.

Sounds like NM has not read the Terms of Service, either my dear sister. Discussing the contents of a PM in the boards is in violation of VJ's terms of service. Reported it has been, as Yoda would say.

It's okay because AIDS = common cold.

(Couldn't help myself, sorry.)

[NutMagnet 2]

Sounds like NM has not read the Terms of Service, either my dear sister. Discussing the contents of a PM in the boards is in violation of VJ's terms of service. Reported it has been, as Yoda would say.

What content and discussion are you referring to?

Edited October 19, 2009 by NutMagnet

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Sounds like NM has not read the Terms of Service, either my dear sister. Discussing the contents of a PM in the boards is in violation of VJ's terms of service. Reported it has been, as Yoda would say.

What content and discussion are you referring to?

When you say" at 11:45, I received a PM from bla bla bla". We are not supposed to do that, it's against TOS.

[belinda63 3,041]

All she said was she received a nasty PM. I am dying to know what it said but she did not get specific. I don't think stating she received a nasty PM is a violation since the content was not revealed.

She then brought to all of our attention that the person who made the original post appears to be modifying their online identifier. For example he states he is a male but his profile says female.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

All she said was she received a nasty PM. I am dying to know what it said but she did not get specific. I don't think stating she received a nasty PM is a violation since the content was not revealed.

She then brought to all of our attention that the person who made the original post appears to be modifying their online identifier. For example he states he is a male but his profile says female.

Belinda, quoting NM:

Well folks, we have a looney here. At 1154 AM yesterday morning, I received the rudest PM message from "Leader" that I have ever received from anyone in my entire life.

The same person subsequently changed their user name from "Leader" to "Loneman" along with a change in his profile gender from Male to Female at 1159 AM.

We are not supposed to do that. We don't have to like the TOS, but you bet we have to follow them.

[NutMagnet 2]

All she said was she received a nasty PM. I am dying to know what it said but she did not get specific. I don't think stating she received a nasty PM is a violation since the content was not revealed.

She then brought to all of our attention that the person who made the original post appears to be modifying their online identifier. For example he states he is a male but his profile says female.

Belinda, quoting NM:

Well folks, we have a looney here. At 1154 AM yesterday morning, I received the rudest PM message from "Leader" that I have ever received from anyone in my entire life.

The same person subsequently changed their user name from "Leader" to "Loneman" along with a change in his profile gender from Male to Female at 1159 AM.

We are not supposed to do that. We don't have to like the TOS, but you bet we have to follow them.

Give it a rest and let the moderators police the board.