MUSLIMS SEEK TO KILL PATRIOT ACT

[TracyHamza 1]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

Where will it all end? First the Whitehouse in taken over by Communists, and now, Congress has been turned into a Taliban training camp? Religious indoctrination in the schools? Oh, the shame! Terrible, and just wrong!

Welcome to the paranoid world of World Nut Daily.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

care to try again?

link

link

google is your friend, try it sometime. there's a whole herd of links just on the search "cair indicted"

Yes, it brings up reliable sources such as jihadwatch.com. And the headline actually reads "un-indicted co-conspirator". Un-indicted. So, not only has this organization not been found guilty but they haven't even been indicted. But, of course, I forgot, since these are evil Muslims, the presumption of innocence doesn't apply to them.

apparently you didn't........

I did. And nothing worth noting comes up. Only paranoid websites. And not even there will you find any claim that CAIR has been indicted on anything.

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

I never heard of CAIR but you have to be careful about lumping all Muslims into one category. There are mainstream Muslims & radical Muslims (including but not limited to terrorists) and I'm pretty sure that mainstream Muslims would be offended if they were associated with the other group.

The left lumps them together. Post a story about terrorism and the morons type "YOU HATE ALL MUSLIMS". So predictable.

[alienlovechild 75]

Newsmax? What's your point?

Where are all the Muslims you mean. Mostly AWOL for the last 8 years thanks in part to groups like CAIR who heighten any offense against Muslims but do little else.

CAIR didn't highlight anything - extreme right wing Members of Congress did.

So CAIR doesn't publicize slights against Muslims but rightwinger members of Congress do? You're more than a little confused but I suspect it's the poorly written response rather than something you really believe.

No comment on why there are so few Muslims in the military, figures.

[nowhereman 1]

I never heard of CAIR but you have to be careful about lumping all Muslims into one category. There are mainstream Muslims & radical Muslims (including but not limited to terrorists) and I'm pretty sure that mainstream Muslims would be offended if they were associated with the other group.

The left lumps them together. Post a story about terrorism and the morons type "YOU HATE ALL MUSLIMS". So predictable.

I don't think you can blame the left for this one... there is a lot of anti-muslim sentiment in America now & it can & often does constitute a slippery slope. If say 10% of a certain group (random %, no idea how accurate it is in this particular situation) is guilty of some sort of heinous act (i.e. muslims who are terrorists) you can't condemn the entire group. Granted when I fly & see a Muslim I'll pay extra attention to him & if that's profiling so be it, but at the same time I understand that the vast majority of Muslims are decent people.

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

care to try again?

link

link

google is your friend, try it sometime. there's a whole herd of links just on the search "cair indicted"

Yes, it brings up reliable sources such as jihadwatch.com. And the headline actually reads "un-indicted co-conspirator". Un-indicted. So, not only has this organization not been found guilty but they haven't even been indicted. But, of course, I forgot, since these are evil Muslims, the presumption of innocence doesn't apply to them.

apparently you didn't........

I did. And nothing worth noting comes up. Only paranoid websites. And not even there will you find any claim that CAIR has been indicted on anything.

and if i or anyone posted anything, you'd attack the source. so why should i or anyone else bother?

[alienlovechild 75]

I don't think you can blame the left for this one... there is a lot of anti-muslim sentiment in America now & it can & often does constitute a slippery slope. If say 10% of a certain group (random %, no idea how accurate it is in this particular situation) is guilty of some sort of heinous act (i.e. muslims who are terrorists) you can't condemn the entire group. Granted when I fly & see a Muslim I'll pay extra attention to him & if that's profiling so be it, but at the same time I understand that the vast majority of Muslims are decent people.

I don't get the anti-Muslim angle as there's relatively few violent incidents here and one death I can think of during the last 8 years of war in Muslim lands. Americans have access to a lot of guns but I don't see Muslims riding around in armored vehicles in the U.S.

It's ok to consider all anti-Obama protestors as potentially violent because McVeigh blew up the Fed building on OK City in 1995. That's what we've been told anyway.

Edited October 17, 2009 by alienlovechild

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Newsmax? What's your point?

Where are all the Muslims you mean. Mostly AWOL for the last 8 years thanks in part to groups like CAIR who heighten any offense against Muslims but do little else.

CAIR didn't highlight anything - extreme right wing Members of Congress did.

So CAIR doesn't publicize slights against Muslims but rightwinger members of Congress do? You're more than a little confused but I suspect it's the poorly written response rather than something you really believe.

No comment on why there are so few Muslims in the military, figures.

I am not worried about CAIR - it's an organization representing some of the Muslims in this country which make up a whopping 0.6% of the population - not exactly of much significance. When right wing nuts in Congress slam the drums on that organization based on ridiculous nonsense then I am think there some reason to worry. Congress should not indulge on the wingnuttery that World Nut Daily represents.

As for the small number of Muslims in the military - you know, I don't even know why any such stats are kept. It's quite irrelevant since, contrary to what Newsmax believes, we don't actually have any Christian Armed Forces. That premise is way off track and any considerations based on it are nothing but a load of #######. You may choose to entertain such nonsense but don't expect any reasonable person to do so.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

care to try again?

link

link

google is your friend, try it sometime. there's a whole herd of links just on the search "cair indicted"

Yes, it brings up reliable sources such as jihadwatch.com. And the headline actually reads "un-indicted co-conspirator". Un-indicted. So, not only has this organization not been found guilty but they haven't even been indicted. But, of course, I forgot, since these are evil Muslims, the presumption of innocence doesn't apply to them.

apparently you didn't........

I did. And nothing worth noting comes up. Only paranoid websites. And not even there will you find any claim that CAIR has been indicted on anything.

and if i or anyone posted anything, you'd attack the source. so why should i or anyone else bother?

You've got a credible source for what you're trying to convey here? I'm all ears.

[almaty 19]

allah bless the Muslims the true patriots

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

allah bless the Muslims the true patriots

Dean, you'e my buddy and all but please, do not infiltrate this sphere. The paranoid don't take it well.

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

care to try again?

link

link

google is your friend, try it sometime. there's a whole herd of links just on the search "cair indicted"

Yes, it brings up reliable sources such as jihadwatch.com. And the headline actually reads "un-indicted co-conspirator". Un-indicted. So, not only has this organization not been found guilty but they haven't even been indicted. But, of course, I forgot, since these are evil Muslims, the presumption of innocence doesn't apply to them.

apparently you didn't........

I did. And nothing worth noting comes up. Only paranoid websites. And not even there will you find any claim that CAIR has been indicted on anything.

and if i or anyone posted anything, you'd attack the source. so why should i or anyone else bother?

You've got a credible source for what you're trying to convey here? I'm all ears.

your idea of credible would be it has to be blessed by obama himself before you'd believe it.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

care to try again?

link

link

google is your friend, try it sometime. there's a whole herd of links just on the search "cair indicted"

Yes, it brings up reliable sources such as jihadwatch.com. And the headline actually reads "un-indicted co-conspirator". Un-indicted. So, not only has this organization not been found guilty but they haven't even been indicted. But, of course, I forgot, since these are evil Muslims, the presumption of innocence doesn't apply to them.

apparently you didn't........

I did. And nothing worth noting comes up. Only paranoid websites. And not even there will you find any claim that CAIR has been indicted on anything.

and if i or anyone posted anything, you'd attack the source. so why should i or anyone else bother?

You've got a credible source for what you're trying to convey here? I'm all ears.

your idea of credible would be it has to be blessed by obama himself before you'd believe it.

How about a letter from the FBI?

http://www.nefafoundation.org/miscellaneou...er_04282009.pdf

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

CAIR has been tied to islamic extremists, and funding raised through CAIR has supported terrorist activities. this is a well documented fact.

The organization would have been dismantled if that was true.

care to try again?

link

link

google is your friend, try it sometime. there's a whole herd of links just on the search "cair indicted"

Yes, it brings up reliable sources such as jihadwatch.com. And the headline actually reads "un-indicted co-conspirator". Un-indicted. So, not only has this organization not been found guilty but they haven't even been indicted. But, of course, I forgot, since these are evil Muslims, the presumption of innocence doesn't apply to them.

apparently you didn't........

I did. And nothing worth noting comes up. Only paranoid websites. And not even there will you find any claim that CAIR has been indicted on anything.

and if i or anyone posted anything, you'd attack the source. so why should i or anyone else bother?

You've got a credible source for what you're trying to convey here? I'm all ears.

your idea of credible would be it has to be blessed by obama himself before you'd believe it.

How about a letter from the FBI?

http://www.nefafoundation.org/miscellaneou...er_04282009.pdf

he'll discount that too - he's got some great blinders.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

You've got a credible source for what you're trying to convey here? I'm all ears.

your idea of credible would be it has to be blessed by obama himself before you'd believe it.

How about a letter from the FBI?

http://www.nefafoundation.org/miscellaneou...er_04282009.pdf

he'll discount that too - he's got some great blinders.

Where's the indictment in that letter? It speaks clearly of the un-indicted co-conspirator and points out that the FBI's decision to sever official contact isn't to be mistaken as a wholesale judgment of the organization or it's membership. Nice try but ... next.