Jump to content
Peikko

Should Sex Offenders Be Barred from Church?

 Share

170 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Call me old fashioned, but I didn't think it was up to the church to decide who was and wasn't fit in this way. It opens some very dangerous doors. It was my understanding, way back when was that when one entered the doors of a church one was allowed to assume complete anonymity, should that be ones choice. Perhaps the better choice would be to keep children out of church?

Yeah I thought the church was supposed to welcome people equally without discrimination or judgment.

Thousands of gay folks, divorced people, etc., would beg to differ with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

There is a difference between welcoming someone in the sense of saying we accept your choices and are ok with them and welcoming in the sense of giving ministry to a lost or wandering soul.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Call me old fashioned, but I didn't think it was up to the church to decide who was and wasn't fit in this way. It opens some very dangerous doors. It was my understanding, way back when was that when one entered the doors of a church one was allowed to assume complete anonymity, should that be ones choice. Perhaps the better choice would be to keep children out of church?

Yeah I thought the church was supposed to welcome people equally without discrimination or judgment.

Thousands of gay folks, divorced people, etc., would beg to differ with this.

Well it wouldn't be the first time that an institution has fallen short of its high standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Call me old fashioned, but I didn't think it was up to the church to decide who was and wasn't fit in this way. It opens some very dangerous doors. It was my understanding, way back when was that when one entered the doors of a church one was allowed to assume complete anonymity, should that be ones choice. Perhaps the better choice would be to keep children out of church?

Yeah I thought the church was supposed to welcome people equally without discrimination or judgment.

Thousands of gay folks, divorced people, etc., would beg to differ with this.

My church is not liberal and we don't ask people at the door whether they are gay or divorced. In fact I know of a couple (girls) who went there regularly until they moved out of state. There are plenty of divorced in church. with 51% rate, its bound to happen. And they aren't kicked out.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Call me old fashioned, but I didn't think it was up to the church to decide who was and wasn't fit in this way. It opens some very dangerous doors. It was my understanding, way back when was that when one entered the doors of a church one was allowed to assume complete anonymity, should that be ones choice. Perhaps the better choice would be to keep children out of church?

Yeah I thought the church was supposed to welcome people equally without discrimination or judgment.

Thousands of gay folks, divorced people, etc., would beg to differ with this.

My church is not liberal and we don't ask people at the door whether they are gay or divorced. In fact I know of a couple (girls) who went there regularly until they moved out of state. There are plenty of divorced in church. with 51% rate, its bound to happen. And they aren't kicked out.

:rolleyes: + :crying: Really, really. And your church, whatever the blip sect it is, is the only one, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me old fashioned, but I didn't think it was up to the church to decide who was and wasn't fit in this way. It opens some very dangerous doors. It was my understanding, way back when was that when one entered the doors of a church one was allowed to assume complete anonymity, should that be ones choice. Perhaps the better choice would be to keep children out of church?

Yeah I thought the church was supposed to welcome people equally without discrimination or judgment.

Thousands of gay folks, divorced people, etc., would beg to differ with this.

My church is not liberal and we don't ask people at the door whether they are gay or divorced. In fact I know of a couple (girls) who went there regularly until they moved out of state. There are plenty of divorced in church. with 51% rate, its bound to happen. And they aren't kicked out.

Churches are not political places, or should not be. That said, I am sure your church is mostly representative of what goes on as regards gay/divorced those who have had abortions. These are not questions that should be asked when attending church and one should not ask if one has committed a crime either, nor should one be afraid to allow those who have be ministered to by one's church.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline

I have an (ex-Brit) friend who lives in Texas who told me that he and his wife left their church in 2004, after the pastor started schilling for Bush from the pulpit - actually telling people how to cast their vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: India
Timeline

I don't actually attend church at the moment. Long story. Nothing weird that happened but my dad is a pastor and they moved away, and the church closed. I am a PK(pastors kid). :P Anyway we had a variety of people come to church, no questions asked. I think though it's just not wise to have someone who was a sex offender against children be around children, in church or out of church. I wouldn't be against them being "ministered" to. But not around kids. Sorry. How would we know if they were a child sex offender? We wouldn't really know.

Married since 9-18-04(All K1 visa & GC details in timeline.)

Ishu tum he mere Prabhu:::Jesus you are my Lord

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I don't actually attend church at the moment. Long story. Nothing weird that happened but my dad is a pastor and they moved away, and the church closed. I am a PK(pastors kid). :P Anyway we had a variety of people come to church, no questions asked. I think though it's just not wise to have someone who was a sex offender against children be around children, in church or out of church. I wouldn't be against them being "ministered" to. But not around kids. Sorry. How would we know if they were a child sex offender? We wouldn't really know.

Basic background check. Costs less than $10.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: India
Timeline
I don't actually attend church at the moment. Long story. Nothing weird that happened but my dad is a pastor and they moved away, and the church closed. I am a PK(pastors kid). :P Anyway we had a variety of people come to church, no questions asked. I think though it's just not wise to have someone who was a sex offender against children be around children, in church or out of church. I wouldn't be against them being "ministered" to. But not around kids. Sorry. How would we know if they were a child sex offender? We wouldn't really know.

Basic background check. Costs less than $10.

:lol: On every unknown person? Ok!

Married since 9-18-04(All K1 visa & GC details in timeline.)

Ishu tum he mere Prabhu:::Jesus you are my Lord

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Call me old fashioned, but I didn't think it was up to the church to decide who was and wasn't fit in this way. It opens some very dangerous doors. It was my understanding, way back when was that when one entered the doors of a church one was allowed to assume complete anonymity, should that be ones choice. Perhaps the better choice would be to keep children out of church?

Yeah I thought the church was supposed to welcome people equally without discrimination or judgment.

Thousands of gay folks, divorced people, etc., would beg to differ with this.

My church is not liberal and we don't ask people at the door whether they are gay or divorced. In fact I know of a couple (girls) who went there regularly until they moved out of state. There are plenty of divorced in church. with 51% rate, its bound to happen. And they aren't kicked out.

:rolleyes: + :crying: Really, really. And your church, whatever the blip sect it is, is the only one, of course.

You really need anger management classes.

K-1 Visa

Service Center : California Service Center

Consulate : Manila, Philippines

I-129F Sent : 2009-08-14

I-129F NOA1 : 2009-08-18

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-10-23

NVC Received : 2009-10-27

NVC Left : 2009-11-06

Consulate Received : 2009-11-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-11-27

Interview Date : 2009-12-16

Interview Result : APPROVED

Second Interview

(If Required):

Second Interview Result:

Visa Received :

US Entry :

Marriage :

Comments :

Processing

Estimates/Stats : Your I-129f was approved in 66 days from your NOA1 date.

Your interview took 120 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather drives against the intent of christianity though doesn't it? Background check required or you can't come in?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...