Do you think huzbulazation of the arab world will bring any good?

[PlatyPius 5]

No, no! They were idyllic! Everyone got along, patted each other on the head and mumbled happy words of support and peace. No one thought for themselves, as that is the devil's work. Free thought must be stamped out!!! Everyone should reply to every post with one of the following:

1) That's great! Glad to hear it!

2) He didn't deserve you anyway.

3) Wow! What a great post! Can I bring you a plate of cookies?

4) No one has ever written a better post than this! You're not only insanely beautiful/handsome, but you write better than Steinbeck!

5)

So I guess calling you a pagan ####### is out of the question?

In the old VJ I could say that without an apology... I would safely presume people would know I'm playing. But today who knows. So in case you don't get it, I'm playing so please don't put a hex on me.

You could. And I could call you a hairy-palmed wanker. ROFL

You don't have to worry about hexes from me....I don't believe in that #######. Far too conservative and skeptical.

Cian - Wow! That's great! Can I bring you a plate of cookies?

He didn't deserve you anyway!

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

Awwww someone missed you Jenn. How cute

kinda hard to miss her when she's not really gone. when a person logs in invisible several times a day it's still easy to see she's been online

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

I call upon other members to report this a$$ and get him banned

why? I embrace diversity. Do you?

I do embrace diversity, but not hate.

Show me the hate... really. Disagreeing is not hate. Fishdude is making fun of his spelling.... that 'is' hate.

Grammar actually - based on the fact that the OP is has and continues to post racialist and highly inflammatory threads with a clear view to ostracising and offending members of this community who share a certain religious and ethnic persuasion. He's a troll pure and simple - the fact that he ducks and runs after starting these threads rather than actually participate in them (other to throw in smug one-liners) is indicative of the fact that he's a gutless coward, as I've said before.

Your hatred of free speach drove somebody to create a second identity to post hear. Feel good about that?

That's not accurate. The first ID (Hristo) caused so many complaints (because of the aforementioned racialism) that it was most likely banned.

This is not a matter of free speech, as much as the OP would like to hide behind that.

To me, it's a question of 'I can say, should I say?'. There's a distinction. Once again, the right to free speech does not come without a measure responsibility.

It would be somewhat different if the guy actually stuck around to participate in a discussion, but he doesn't. He pops up to throw in a few racially offensive remarks and ducks away. A coward.

You know I'm, partially, jerking your chain. But many times on the board one sees calls for banning when there really is just a disagreement. You actually did this to me. I have actually done this to no one.

Who has more Nobel prizes? Not sure. But prove him wrong if he is wrong.

[mawilson 2,133]

Do you think huzbulazation of the arab world will bring any good?

Hmmmm not so sure about that....

....but it's evident that more than a few members here would agree that your new "identity" could probably use a Katyusha up its azz

wife_of_mahmoud, where have you been? I can't believe you missed all the good threads:

Who or what is terrorism?

Optimism in Syria

Does Israel have a right to exist?

Should there be an independent Palestinian state?

[Peter Miami 0]

Do you think huzbulazation of the arab world will bring any good?

Non what so ever!

Peter Miami

[almaty 19]

Hey, another VJ witch hunt! Whoo Hoo!

always good ...

[Jenn! 918]

Awwww someone missed you Jenn. How cute

kinda hard to miss her when she's not really gone. when a person logs in invisible several times a day it's still easy to see she's been online

Hmmmm, and how would you know that Charles? Other than monitoring my profile several times a day????? Kind of scary in itself, but to admit it openly on the forum....

A girl's allowed to change her mind, isn't she????

BTW, Thanks Karo!

Back to my indefinite hiatus....

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You know I'm, partially, jerking your chain. But many times on the board one sees calls for banning when there really is just a disagreement. You actually did this to me. I have actually done this to no one.

Who has more Nobel prizes? Not sure. But prove him wrong if he is wrong.

Calling for a thread to be closed when it degenerates into name calling is not the same as calling for a user to be banned. A user who as I said, has a history of starting topics of a consistently racially offensive nature.

I'm not saying he is wrong about the nobel prize issue, although as another poster pointed out in that thread - his list was incomplete. Its his use of this forum in total disregard for a large section of the members, and the clear the sentiment behind it I find objectionable.

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

You know I'm, partially, jerking your chain. But many times on the board one sees calls for banning when there really is just a disagreement. You actually did this to me. I have actually done this to no one.

Who has more Nobel prizes? Not sure. But prove him wrong if he is wrong.

Calling for a thread to be closed when it degenerates into name calling is not the same as calling for a user to be banned. A user who as I said, has a history of starting topics of a consistently racially offensive nature.

I'm not saying he is wrong about the nobel prize issue, although as another poster pointed out in that thread - his list was incomplete. Its his use of this forum in total disregard for a large section of the members, and the clear the sentiment behind it I find objectionable.

Complete the list then.... Not you, whoever disagrees really. But calling to ban this guy? weak.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You know I'm, partially, jerking your chain. But many times on the board one sees calls for banning when there really is just a disagreement. You actually did this to me. I have actually done this to no one.

Who has more Nobel prizes? Not sure. But prove him wrong if he is wrong.

Calling for a thread to be closed when it degenerates into name calling is not the same as calling for a user to be banned. A user who as I said, has a history of starting topics of a consistently racially offensive nature.

I'm not saying he is wrong about the nobel prize issue, although as another poster pointed out in that thread - his list was incomplete. Its his use of this forum in total disregard for a large section of the members, and the clear the sentiment behind it I find objectionable.

Complete the list then.... Not you, whoever disagrees really. But calling to ban this guy? weak.

I just wonder if you would be so philosophical if he were posting links to anti-semitic websites...?

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

You know I'm, partially, jerking your chain. But many times on the board one sees calls for banning when there really is just a disagreement. You actually did this to me. I have actually done this to no one.

Who has more Nobel prizes? Not sure. But prove him wrong if he is wrong.

Calling for a thread to be closed when it degenerates into name calling is not the same as calling for a user to be banned. A user who as I said, has a history of starting topics of a consistently racially offensive nature.

I'm not saying he is wrong about the nobel prize issue, although as another poster pointed out in that thread - his list was incomplete. Its his use of this forum in total disregard for a large section of the members, and the clear the sentiment behind it I find objectionable.

Complete the list then.... Not you, whoever disagrees really. But calling to ban this guy? weak.

I just wonder if you would be so philosophical if he were posting links to anti-semitic websites...?

Not if they were true.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You know I'm, partially, jerking your chain. But many times on the board one sees calls for banning when there really is just a disagreement. You actually did this to me. I have actually done this to no one.

Who has more Nobel prizes? Not sure. But prove him wrong if he is wrong.

Calling for a thread to be closed when it degenerates into name calling is not the same as calling for a user to be banned. A user who as I said, has a history of starting topics of a consistently racially offensive nature.

I'm not saying he is wrong about the nobel prize issue, although as another poster pointed out in that thread - his list was incomplete. Its his use of this forum in total disregard for a large section of the members, and the clear the sentiment behind it I find objectionable.

Complete the list then.... Not you, whoever disagrees really. But calling to ban this guy? weak.

I just wonder if you would be so philosophical if he were posting links to anti-semitic websites...?

Not if they were true.

Hmmmm...

[kittykatwoman 0]

*yawn* Trollito!

[Elizabethnhenry 0]

[Ban Hammer 13,345]

Awwww someone missed you Jenn. How cute

kinda hard to miss her when she's not really gone. when a person logs in invisible several times a day it's still easy to see she's been online

Hmmmm, and how would you know that Charles? Other than monitoring my profile several times a day????? Kind of scary in itself, but to admit it openly on the forum....

A girl's allowed to change her mind, isn't she????

BTW, Thanks Karo!

Back to my indefinite hiatus....

just proves you are full of bs, like another one who said she was leaving. and i got about 2 dozen screenshots to prove you were yanking everyone's chain.

now run along and dream up your next drama.