USA President Approval Rating - 38% per MSNBC!

[zqt3344 21]

MSNBC just begrudgingly released new approval ratings for USA president which is down to......

38%

Lot of stunned and shocked tv journalist on MSNBC this morning, looks like reality is setting in and opening their eyes finally!

[onuche 0]

MSNBC just begrudgingly released new approval ratings for USA president which is down to......

38%

Lot of stunned and shocked tv journalist on MSNBC this morning, looks like reality is setting in and opening their eyes finally!

You got that from Fox news right?

[zqt3344 21]

Nope, from Morning Joe and Mika! AHHAAHHA

MSNBC just begrudgingly released new approval ratings for USA president which is down to......

38%

Lot of stunned and shocked tv journalist on MSNBC this morning, looks like reality is setting in and opening their eyes finally!

You got that from Fox news right?

[sly_wolf 199]

MSNBC just begrudgingly released new approval ratings for USA president which is down to......

38%

Lot of stunned and shocked tv journalist on MSNBC this morning, looks like reality is setting in and opening their eyes finally!

Are you looking for some attention?

[zqt3344 21]

I see all you liberal loving dove chasing change agent O bots are in silence today and rightfully so, you know it is the truth and America is already sick of this president, he is a 1 term charlie! AHHAHAHA Another Jimmy Carter! Maybe Ovomit can learn to eat peanuts with Jimmy and they can both go on speaking circuit together.

MSNBC just begrudgingly released new approval ratings for USA president which is down to......

38%

Lot of stunned and shocked tv journalist on MSNBC this morning, looks like reality is setting in and opening their eyes finally!

Are you looking for some attention?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

If you hadn't noticed ZQT, you're stuck with the guy until 2012.

Presumably polls are the only comfort you can find when the will of the voters in 2008 has essentially told you to STFU.

[zqt3344 21]

He will be a lame duck president in less than 2 years, the Democrats will lose control of Congress, due to there reckless far left agenda. And you will be stuck with that reality for the next 2-3 years.

If you hadn't noticed ZQT, you're stuck with the guy until 2012.

Presumably polls are the only comfort you can find when the will of the voters in 2008 has essentially told you to STFU.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I guess we'll see, won't we.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

He's only as obsessed with polls as the libs were during Bush. Now all of a sudden they are irrelevant to the left (unless of course you can show that 51% of Americans are FOR U-care - then they become relevant again).

"If polls support our agenda, then we use the data. If polls are against our agenda, we throw them out completely" - Libs

[zqt3344 21]

Exactly what I am trying to point out, so true Joe!

He's only as obsessed with polls as the libs were during Bush. Now all of a sudden they are irrelevant to the left (unless of course you can show that 51% of Americans are FOR U-care - then they become relevant again).

"If polls support our agenda, then we use the data. If polls are against our agenda, we throw them out completely" - Libs

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

He's only as obsessed with polls as the libs were during Bush. Now all of a sudden they are irrelevant to the left (unless of course you can show that 51% of Americans are FOR U-care - then they become relevant again).

"If polls support our agenda, then we use the data. If polls are against our agenda, we throw them out completely" - Libs

More dishonest garbage Joe.

There's no agenda here, certainly none I follow - so lets not open that particular can of dogshit please, you'll just end up with it all over your face.

Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for me towards the end of his administration, when the writing was on the wall for him anyway.

How exactly can a new administration which came into power right in the middle of a massive economic crisis can be judged honestly and objectively on its own merits - barely 9 months into a new term of office?

[Joseph & Ana 0]

He's only as obsessed with polls as the libs were during Bush. Now all of a sudden they are irrelevant to the left (unless of course you can show that 51% of Americans are FOR U-care - then they become relevant again).

"If polls support our agenda, then we use the data. If polls are against our agenda, we throw them out completely" - Libs

More dishonest garbage Joe.

There's no agenda here, certainly none I follow - so lets not open that particular can of dogshit please, you'll just end up with it all over your face.

Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for me towards the end of his administration, when the writing was on the wall for him anyway.

How exactly can a new administration which came into power right in the middle of a massive economic crisis can be judged honestly and objectively on its own merits - barely 9 months into a new term of office?

You just admitted that you're a lib. I didn't direct my post to you, but you're taking it as such. If Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for you at the end, then you aren't the typical lib. But a lib nonetheless by your own admission.

The others were obsessed with it for about 6 years. Like I said, now its irrelevant to them, and it will continue to be irrelevant to them in 3 years as well. If the economy survives the rampant printing of money, Obama will get credit for it, despite the fact that the economy OVERCAME his spending. However, he's looking eerily like Hoover and declaring that the recession is on the mend when its still years in the making.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

He's only as obsessed with polls as the libs were during Bush. Now all of a sudden they are irrelevant to the left (unless of course you can show that 51% of Americans are FOR U-care - then they become relevant again).

"If polls support our agenda, then we use the data. If polls are against our agenda, we throw them out completely" - Libs

More dishonest garbage Joe.

There's no agenda here, certainly none I follow - so lets not open that particular can of dogshit please, you'll just end up with it all over your face.

Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for me towards the end of his administration, when the writing was on the wall for him anyway.

How exactly can a new administration which came into power right in the middle of a massive economic crisis can be judged honestly and objectively on its own merits - barely 9 months into a new term of office?

You just admitted that you're a lib. I didn't direct my post to you, but you're taking it as such. If Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for you at the end, then you aren't the typical lib. But a lib nonetheless by your own admission.

The others were obsessed with it for about 6 years. Like I said, now its irrelevant to them, and it will continue to be irrelevant to them in 3 years as well. If the economy survives the rampant printing of money, Obama will get credit for it, despite the fact that the economy OVERCAME his spending. However, he's looking eerily like Hoover and declaring that the recession is on the mend when its still years in the making.

No offence, but you're a noob Joe - you know nothing about me, so please stop trying to pretend that you are privy to my views when all you do is throw out a silly cartoon characterisation based on your own silly preconceptions.

I only respond to this lib garbage because that's how you continue to characterise me (and because it appeared to be in reference to my exchange with ZQT). In the sense of how inane it is - its a red rag to a bull, there's nothing more to it than that.

I expect if I respond to this stuff in kind and start stereotyping you all over the place that this sort of approach will lose its appeal to you. Perhaps its all meant in the spirit of humour as you say, but the more you bang on about it, the more I think you actually believe it.

[The_Dude 1,142]

He's only as obsessed with polls as the libs were during Bush. Now all of a sudden they are irrelevant to the left (unless of course you can show that 51% of Americans are FOR U-care - then they become relevant again).

"If polls support our agenda, then we use the data. If polls are against our agenda, we throw them out completely" - Libs

More dishonest garbage Joe.

There's no agenda here, certainly none I follow - so lets not open that particular can of dogshit please, you'll just end up with it all over your face.

Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for me towards the end of his administration, when the writing was on the wall for him anyway.

How exactly can a new administration which came into power right in the middle of a massive economic crisis can be judged honestly and objectively on its own merits - barely 9 months into a new term of office?

You just admitted that you're a lib. I didn't direct my post to you, but you're taking it as such. If Bush's poll numbers only became an issue for you at the end, then you aren't the typical lib. But a lib nonetheless by your own admission.

The others were obsessed with it for about 6 years. Like I said, now its irrelevant to them, and it will continue to be irrelevant to them in 3 years as well. If the economy survives the rampant printing of money, Obama will get credit for it, despite the fact that the economy OVERCAME his spending. However, he's looking eerily like Hoover and declaring that the recession is on the mend when its still years in the making.

You say that as if admitting that you are politcally liberal is akin to admitting that you were a mass murderer. You cons need to get over that bit of narcicism. It's a matter of opinion, not some sort of disease as you like to think it is. You make all these generalizations about "others" and "libs", none of which has any pertinence or application to anyone here really. If you want to find a post where someone made those claims you speak of specifically, then by all means, chastise them. But in the absence of such material, do stfu about it. You clog up the boards here with such mindless trite.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Exactly - its so fvcking childish this assertion that there are clearly defined sides where everyone holds identical, cardboard cutout opinions.

What Joe seems unable to accept is that individuals have a variance of opinion. He seems to think that the only debates that exist are between partisan types over partisan issues, and not over individual ideology.