Why are we in Afghanistan?

[zqt3344 21]

The USA could wipe out Pakistan in a matter of hours or minutes if it so desired with the push of a button, remember that.

AHHAHA rightttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt! It would be over with and done in hours if USA decided to take them out. Fact.

Pakistan is a pretty massive (and populous) country with nuclear weapons, you'd have to be mad to want to go to war there.

Overstatement of the day......

Yeah come on. Now you're giving conservatives a bad name. Do Afghanistan and Iraq ring a bell? Both didn't have nukes or much of a military and its taken years and lives. You think Pokestan will take a shorter time?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Oh dear.

Its the nuclear age equivalent of "my dad can beat up your dad".

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Underthinking of today more like it. You under estimate the USA don't you.

AHHAHA rightttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt! It would be over with and done in hours if USA decided to take them out. Fact.

Pakistan is a pretty massive (and populous) country with nuclear weapons, you'd have to be mad to want to go to war there.

Overstatement of the day......

Dude - its delusional to think that unless you're planning on nuking the place. Short of that (which is morally wrong) there ain't no easy war there. War is never easy. Certain battles perhaps, but the war will be just as costly in lives, in years, and in dollars as the other 2. Probably even more.

[zqt3344 21]

I am simply pointing out the facts, the USA can and has done it before and has the ability to do it again. So Pakistan will keep it's #### in line with the USA and Pakistan knows it.

Underthinking of today more like it. You under estimate the USA don't you.

AHHAHA rightttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt! It would be over with and done in hours if USA decided to take them out. Fact.

Pakistan is a pretty massive (and populous) country with nuclear weapons, you'd have to be mad to want to go to war there.

Overstatement of the day......

Dude - its delusional to think that unless you're planning on nuking the place. Short of that (which is morally wrong) there ain't no easy war there. War is never easy. Certain battles perhaps, but the war will be just as costly in lives, in years, and in dollars as the other 2. Probably even more.

[sara..... 371]

Underthinking of today more like it. You under estimate the USA don't you.

AHHAHA rightttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt! It would be over with and done in hours if USA decided to take them out. Fact.

Pakistan is a pretty massive (and populous) country with nuclear weapons, you'd have to be mad to want to go to war there.

Overstatement of the day......

Dude - its delusional to think that unless you're planning on nuking the place. Short of that (which is morally wrong) there ain't no easy war there. War is never easy. Certain battles perhaps, but the war will be just as costly in lives, in years, and in dollars as the other 2. Probably even more.

there is even more to think about than that..........if we nuk pak, india will for once in a life time be on pak side cuz u know if we try to take out pak that pak will push the button to destroy india.......there are so many reasons not to nuk pak that are real issues..........its easy to set at a computer and say we should do this or do that but this would make a parking lot out of a bunch of countries not just pak.

anyways just my opinion

sara

[zqt3344 21]

Wasn't Pakistan another failed Queen colony experiment gone awry? curious what happened there with the British?

Oh dear.

Its the nuclear age equivalent of "my dad can beat up your dad".

India is not capable of inflicting damage on USA.

Underthinking of today more like it. You under estimate the USA don't you.

AHHAHA rightttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt! It would be over with and done in hours if USA decided to take them out. Fact.

Pakistan is a pretty massive (and populous) country with nuclear weapons, you'd have to be mad to want to go to war there.

Overstatement of the day......

Dude - its delusional to think that unless you're planning on nuking the place. Short of that (which is morally wrong) there ain't no easy war there. War is never easy. Certain battles perhaps, but the war will be just as costly in lives, in years, and in dollars as the other 2. Probably even more.

there is even more to think about than that..........if we nuk pak, india will for once in a life time be on pak side cuz u know if we try to take out pak that pak will push the button to destroy india.......there are so many reasons not to nuk pak that are real issues..........its easy to set at a computer and say we should do this or do that but this would make a parking lot out of a bunch of countries not just pak.

anyways just my opinion

sara

[The_Dude 1,142]

I think we should take a step back for a moment to consider that using nuclear weapons for anything other than a deterrent is a failed strategy, period. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and an unstable government which lacks control over all the provinces in it's own territory. They may lack the delivery system to attack the U.S. if we used nuclear weapons on them, but they would attack one of our allies. I wonder which strategic partner of ours they would hit..... hmmmm. An attack on India would have untold reprucussions. So, no, i'm not underthinking nuclear weapons, or our nations millitary capabilities.

[zqt3344 21]

And what is India going to do???? Send us to the slumdog neighborhood?

I think we should take a step back for a moment to consider that using nuclear weapons for anything other than a deterrent is a failed strategy, period. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and an unstable government which lacks control over all the provinces in it's own territory. They may lack the delivery system to attack the U.S. if we used nuclear weapons on them, but they would attack one of our allies. I wonder which strategic partner of ours they would hit..... hmmmm. An attack on India would have untold reprucussions. So, no, i'm not underthinking nuclear weapons, or our nations millitary capabilities.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Wasn't Pakistan another failed Queen colony experiment gone awry? curious what happened there with the British?

What are you curious about?

I'm curious about your abysmal English.

[Kevin and 10]

India is not capable of inflicting damage on USA.

We could have major computer problems if they cut us off from tech support. On a serious note-No one thought that guys in a cave could either. I wouldn't underestimate India.

[zqt3344 21]

It is pig latin ole chap! Another failed Queen colony experiment in Afghanistan and Pakistan eh? Was Britain not using those two places as colonies at one time or not? What happened to British touch of civilizing these radical islamic degenerates?

Wasn't Pakistan another failed Queen colony experiment gone awry? curious what happened there with the British?

What are you curious about?

I'm curious about your abysmal English.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

What is a "Queen colony experiment", is that something to do with ants?

Actually Britain ruled India (which broke up into modern day India and Pakistan) not long after the British left. But yes, Britain ruled Afghanistan to for a few years.

What of it?

[The_Dude 1,142]

I think we have a new pupil of the Dannologic curriculum.

[zqt3344 21]

AH HA, Britain did and now we have this problem years later, and the USA is cleaning up the mess left by the British once again!

What is a "Queen colony experiment", is that something to do with ants?

Actually Britain ruled India (which broke up into modern day India and Pakistan) not long after the British left. But yes, Britain ruled Afghanistan to for a few years.

What of it?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

If recent history is any indication, the US seems dead set on following the example and making its own messes.