Jimmy Carter: Wilson comments 'based on racism'

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

[natty bumppo 297]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

i don't think your opinion counts in that matter

didn't know I was applying for the rent-a-mod role. wonder how I'm supposed to feel about stevens proclamation?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

So you're whole argument than is that I'm far worse than you at using negative terms. Oh boy. Thanks for the entertainment, Sofi. Hugs...you know I love you even when you are completely illogical.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

So you're whole argument than is that I'm far worse than you at using negative terms. Oh boy. Thanks for the entertainment, Sofi. Hugs...you know I love you even when you are completely illogical.

If I am ever completely illogical, it must be because completely illogial is contagious and I get it from you.

[nowhereman 1]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

Please point out the threads on this board that I have started to bait and demean Dimocrats, then point out the threads started to bait and demean conservatives. You are a partisan, pure and simple, despite all of your denounciations of partisanship.

[rebeccajo 14]

Oh FFS.

[nowhereman 1]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

Please point out the threads on this board that I have started to bait and demean Dimocrats, then point out the threads started to bait and demean conservatives. You are a partisan, pure and simple, despite all of your denounciations of partisanship.

First of all the argument that it's OK to act like a jackass because someone else is doesn't fly with me. Secondly I've denounced comments from the VJ Left on more than one occasion... how many times have you denounced similar comments from the VJ Right? I'm guessing it's a number between -1 and 1.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

Please point out the threads on this board that I have started to bait and demean Dimocrats, then point out the threads started to bait and demean conservatives. You are a partisan, pure and simple, despite all of your denounciations of partisanship.

First of all the argument that it's OK to act like a jackass because someone else is doesn't fly with me. Secondly I've denounced comments from the VJ Left on more than one occasion... how many times have you denounced similar comments from the VJ Right? I'm guessing it's a number between -1 and 1.

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

Edited September 17, 2009 by Sofiyya

[nowhereman 1]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

Please point out the threads on this board that I have started to bait and demean Dimocrats, then point out the threads started to bait and demean conservatives. You are a partisan, pure and simple, despite all of your denounciations of partisanship.

First of all the argument that it's OK to act like a jackass because someone else is doesn't fly with me. Secondly I've denounced comments from the VJ Left on more than one occasion... how many times have you denounced similar comments from the VJ Right? I'm guessing it's a number between -1 and 1.

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

As I have said on many occasions I have no issue at all with people expressing their views... what irks me is labeling, stereotyping & demeaning other viewpoints and you do that all the time. For example if you said you were against Obama's healthcare plan for reasons a, b & c or you have fundamental disagreements with the democrats for reasons d, e, & f I wouldn't have any issue with that at all. However instead of doing that you make nonsensical statements about Obama (aka Barry), call the democrats "dimocrats", say that everyone who supports Obama is a sheep, etc.

Like I've said many times my two best friends are Republicans and we disagree on quite a few issues, but we at least exchange ideas and listen to each other. It would be nice if that happened on VJ once in a while.

[Ban Hammer 13,333]

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

a general group versus a specific individual. can't you tell the difference between the insults?

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

that's not exactly taking the high road, ya know.

[_Simpson_ 250]

Can it be stated on this day that neither Charles nor Natty are the best examples to be acting as rent-a-mods? It's why neither one of you will ever be asked to become one.

But, we are the ones willing to play with you tonight. Are you going to stay or take your ball and go home, now?

Sorry, Sofi - I don't play your game of throwing verbal jabs but cry foul when someone throws one back at me. Just remember there's a difference between you calling me a ** and calling Democrats in general Dimocrats. If you were a Democrat and I were calling Democrats, Dimocrats, I would have enough humility to accept you calling Right Wingers lunatics....but hey, that's just me. Some of us are more thick skinned than others.

I called Dimocrats, Dimocrats. Leftist, Leftists, and liberals, liberals. That's hardly a drop in the bucket compared to the horde of negative terms you use for conservatives. I notice because they make me laugh.

Charles you know full well that VW makes inflammatory comments on a regular basis that I'm sure could easily be construed as baiting, but you ignore them. However when someone says something back you jump on it. It's like a situation where there is a kid that's always saying annoying & ignorant stuff to other people & another kid finally has enough & punches the first kid in the nose. Sure the second kid should have shown more restraint but the first kid was the instigator.

How was I the instigator?

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

Please point out the threads on this board that I have started to bait and demean Dimocrats, then point out the threads started to bait and demean conservatives. You are a partisan, pure and simple, despite all of your denounciations of partisanship.

First of all the argument that it's OK to act like a jackass because someone else is doesn't fly with me. Secondly I've denounced comments from the VJ Left on more than one occasion... how many times have you denounced similar comments from the VJ Right? I'm guessing it's a number between -1 and 1.

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

I think the fact that nowhere has not b1ithced about Steven but taking issue with you and charles is proof enough that he favors the left so I think he needs to quit acting all noble. Steven has a Kazillion names for the right and uses them all the time.

Edited September 17, 2009 by _Simpson_

[Sofiyya 1,687]

As I have said on many occasions I have no issue at all with people expressing their views... what irks me is labeling, stereotyping & demeaning other viewpoints and you do that all the time. For example if you said you were against Obama's healthcare plan for reasons a, b & c or you have fundamental disagreements with the democrats for reasons d, e, & f I wouldn't have any issue with that at all. However instead of doing that you make nonsensical statements about Obama (aka Barry), call the democrats "dimocrats", say that everyone who supports Obama is a sheep, etc.

Like I've said many times my two best friends are Republicans and we disagree on quite a few issues, but we at least exchange ideas and listen to each other. It would be nice if that happened on VJ once in a while.

If you don't like labeling, stereotyping and demeaning, why are you here? This is the OT! It's not Oxford debating. I'm at a loss to understand why my posts aggrevate you more than most others, but, then again, I don't really care. I know how selective you can be about posting insults since you have posted pleanty of them to me.

Seriously, why do you expect me to post to your liking? What makes your preferences the priority here? There is no doubt that, in reality where I dwell, that I bother you simply because I am not a liberal. If that wasn't the case, you would not be compelled to repeatedly single me out for lecturing considering all the name-calling, labeling and demeaning from the Left that I have no hope of keeping up with. I'm not the worse here by far.

You didn't even bother to acknowlege honestly whic side excels in baiting because to do so, you would have to admit I don't even rank. So, continue to selectively denounce and dislike all you want. No skin off my teeth.

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

that's not exactly taking the high road, ya know.

I'm in low road territory right now.

[nowhereman 1]

As I have said on many occasions I have no issue at all with people expressing their views... what irks me is labeling, stereotyping & demeaning other viewpoints and you do that all the time. For example if you said you were against Obama's healthcare plan for reasons a, b & c or you have fundamental disagreements with the democrats for reasons d, e, & f I wouldn't have any issue with that at all. However instead of doing that you make nonsensical statements about Obama (aka Barry), call the democrats "dimocrats", say that everyone who supports Obama is a sheep, etc.

Like I've said many times my two best friends are Republicans and we disagree on quite a few issues, but we at least exchange ideas and listen to each other. It would be nice if that happened on VJ once in a while.

If you don't like labeling, stereotyping and demeaning, why are you here? This is the OT! It's not Oxford debating. I'm at a loss to understand why my posts aggrevate you more than most others, but, then again, I don't really care. I know how selective you can be about posting insults since you have posted pleanty of them to me.

Seriously, why do you expect me to post to your liking? What makes your preferences the priority here? There is no doubt that, in reality where I dwell, that I bother you simply because I am not a liberal. If that wasn't the case, you would not be compelled to repeatedly single me out for lecturing considering all the name-calling, labeling and demeaning from the Left that I have no hope of keeping up with. I'm not the worse here by far.

You didn't even bother to acknowlege honestly whic side excels in baiting because to do so, you would have to admit I don't even rank. So, continue to selectively denounce and dislike all you want. No skin off my teeth.

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

that's not exactly taking the high road, ya know.

I'm in low road territory right now.

Amazing... so in conclusion you can say whatever you want because someone with an opposing view made a similarly inflammatory remark at one point. When I call your BS you attack me by saying that I'm self-righteous & bias (glossing completely over the fact that I have, on several occasions, similarly denounced comments from the VJ Left). However what's missing here is any sort of self reflection on how absolutely hypocritical you are.

[nowhereman 1]

You regularly make derogatory generalizations about democrats, Obama, etc. that some find offensive & without looking up the definition of baiting that must at least be in a gray area. I know you do it to get a reaction & attention, but sometimes you go too far.

a general group versus a specific individual. can't you tell the difference between the insults?

I don't act like a jackass. That would be Steven. I merely have opinions that you don't like. That's not grounds for making you the OT referee and elevating your overwrought, self-righteous assertions to sacrement about who is allowed to post what. Denounce all you want, that's your right. But, I don't take your opinion as law anymore than you take mine as law. It's still clear that you favor the Left over the Right. Ok, but it's no big deal to me.

that's not exactly taking the high road, ya know.

Well Charles you get a point for #2. As for #1 you're pretty close to splitting hairs.