Bob McDonnell..Va. govenor campaign

[almaty 19]

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Eager to draw attention l's conservative roots, campaign advisers to Democrat Creigh Deeds on Monday called McDonnell's newly-discovered 1989 graduate thesis a "devastating" revelation that threatens to sink the Republican's campaign for the Virginia governor's mansion.

The 93-page research paper — first revealed in Sunday's Washington Post — articulated a Christian conservative worldview that .

On a conference call with reporters, Deeds adviser Mo Elleithee called the thesis McDonnell's "road map" for conservative governance. The Deeds camp argued that McDonnell immediately sought to put his theories to work in state government when he was elected to the Virginia House of Delegates three years after writing the paper, which McDonnell wrote as master's student at Regent University in Virginia Beach.

Regent was founded by Pat Robertson and was initially named "CBN University" after Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network. McDonnell wrote the paper when he was 34, twenty years before entering the Virginia governor's race.

"This paper laid out very explicity his vision for the role of government, his vision for the for a social agenda that should dominate governace, and it even went beyond just a personal political philosophy," Elleithee said. "It had a 15-point action plan for how to implement that philosophy."

The thesis was called "The Republican Party's Vision for the Family: The Compelling Issue of the Decade." In it, McDonnell wrote that working women are "detrimental" the the family; that feminism is among "the real enemies of the traditional family"; and that the "purging" of religious influence in public schools is damaging to healthy families.

This paper laid out very explicity his vision for the role of government, his vision for the for a social agenda that should dominate governace, and it even went beyond just a personal political philosophy," Elleithee said. "It had a 15-point action plan for how to implement that philosophy."

facism in action

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

So what do you want, a Republican Party that condones fornication and encourages women to run for President?

[almaty 19]

So what do you want, a Republican Party that condones fornication and encourages women to run for President?

well yeah..i suppose....they could get out of the 1930s one day

[Danno 1,228]

Sure would be interesting to read Obamas 15 point plans...... from back in the day...if only he's let us.

But that.... and everything else is tightly under wraps (as is the wifes).

Wonder why?

I'm betting it's a little more exciting than suggesting kids have a mom and dad that are married.

[Tahoma 2,292]

A while back, I read an article which talked about the many Regent University graduates who worked in the Bush Administration. Scary stuff.

[almaty 19]

you write bullshit like this facist fuckster ..then reap it...

are you saying he is right , danno...? seems like deflection to me on his behalf...

[Otto 83]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

[Danno 1,228]

you write bullshit like this facist fuckster ..then reap it...

are you saying he is right , danno...? seems like deflection to me on his behalf...

Well I hav't read what he wrote so I couldn't say for sure but I'm betting I agree with some of his points.

As for how he wants to achieve his goals, we never got that part did we?

Thats the part thats the pass or fail test.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Feminism was created to give unattractive women access to the mainstream of society.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

oh snap!!! I love those words!!!

this dude is a chop.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

Whoah...that'd be a bold step. First, government would have to officially recognize the term, 'sin' and define just what it means in some legal context.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

Whoah...that'd be a bold step. First, government would have to officially recognize the term, 'sin' and define just what it means in some legal context.

I wonder if he had a tax rate for certain sexual activities???

BJ --25% tax

69- 50% tax (I mean, it's double tag team)

[Joseph & Ana 0]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

Whoah...that'd be a bold step. First, government would have to officially recognize the term, 'sin' and define just what it means in some legal context.

I wonder if he had a tax rate for certain sexual activities???

BJ --25% tax

69- 50% tax (I mean, it's double tag team)

Nah, he's not a democrat. That comes after they get done with tobacco and alcohol or any other entertainment.

[Ban Hammer 13,632]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

Whoah...that'd be a bold step. First, government would have to officially recognize the term, 'sin' and define just what it means in some legal context.

I wonder if he had a tax rate for certain sexual activities???

BJ --25% tax

69- 50% tax (I mean, it's double tag team)

there goes my paycheck

[Chica Yeyé 41]

On page 65 he wrote:

"every level of government should statutorily and procedurally prefer married couples over cohabitators, homosexuals or fornicators. The cost of sin should fall on the sinner, not the taxpayer."

Whoah...that'd be a bold step. First, government would have to officially recognize the term, 'sin' and define just what it means in some legal context.

I wonder if he had a tax rate for certain sexual activities???

BJ --25% tax

69- 50% tax (I mean, it's double tag team)

Nah, he's not a democrat. That comes after they get done with tobacco and alcohol or any other entertainment.