Jump to content

87 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

They are welcome to come and rummage through our dirty laundry.....and if they want they can put a laundry load of his sweaty work clothes on....

I've seen a few visits crop up on VJ over the last few weeks. Considering that we as members of this forum represent a small percentage on the number of immigrant visa's being issued, makes this seem like a visit isn't as unusual as one would think.

Eeeeeeeeek. I better tidy my house ;-)

K1

PLEASE SEE MY TIMELINE FOR K1 INFORMATION

AOS complete!

08/21/2009 - AOS package sent

08/28/2009 - NOA 1 for AOS, EAD, AP

08/31/2009 - Cheque cashed

09/05/2009 - Biometrics notice received

09/23/2009 - Biometrics Appointment

09/23/2009 - I-485 Transferred to CSC

10/02/2009 - EAD Approved (card production) & AP approved!

10/11/2009 - EAD Card received

10/20/2009 - AOS approved, GC card production ordered! (53 days in total)

10/26/2009 - Green Card received - nearly 11 months to the day of our K1 NOA 1!

11/25/2009 - Started my new job!

02/26/2010 - Passed my driving test :-p

07/20/2011 - Eligible to remove conditions

2012 - Going for citizenship

09/20/2011 - Removal of conditions submitted to VSC....here we go...again!

It's been a quick and relatively painless journey thanks to tireless research, dumb luck and this community :)

DONE with USCIS for a while :)

mnb0ir.png

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
if they were in need of search warrant, they would get it before coming to your house
No. They are hoping for (and banking on) consensual entry that is granted by Constitutionally ignorant members of the public... or those who are so eager to "cooperate" that they forget that the State is always (always) after bodies.
They usually don't bring that because they know you can't deny their entry into the house
This is 100% wrong. The shell that remains of the Fourth Amendment says otherwise. Please study some basic civics before making incorrect statements. Heed what Lancer says.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

I imagine them as one serious trouble not from local office but head office, how they get trained and how to deal with the situation in a matter of minutes, they are pretty expert and I have read that. Going through with the laundry, is one common way to search and measure the bonafide relationship, but if someone claims that they messed up with everything, thats not true.

I dont understand onething, and If anyone from you put the light on it. Why would u deny entry of ICE or USCIS ppl...Why one would say, hey show me the warrant then get in, Why you would go further ahead with the situation when you can settle it down by let them enter into your house. I can tell you, treating them like your guest and cooperating in anyway they want would be more beneficial in your case.

PPl should cooperate with law especially with Immi laws rather than saying NO in anyways

I think your imagining that they are the men in suits at your local office. They are not. They are have been trained for a wide range of criminal activity from smuggling to counterfeiting etc. Yes they can get a warrant later but then you have a lawyer present then as well.

What can they honestly report back if you do not let them in "I was not allowed access".

You should also check this poster's other thread as I did just now. They went through her dirty laundry!

AOS Transferred to CSC.......................August 4th 2009

AP/EAD Approval Notice appeared....August 21st 2009

AP/EAD received in mails.................... 08/27/09, 08/31/09

AOS at CSC.............................................Pending

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Its not anything to first go through with basics , but whoever thinks He's smaters than IMMi guys, he's in a dark side. Kindly go through with the statement I gave. "COOPERATE IN ANWAYS POSSIBLE" Saying "NO" wouldn't do anything but onemore visit may be with some extra IMMi fat guys. They don't tell you nor inform you in advance why they come, you never know what they did find out in your application,

A person who doesn't have anything to hide or worry, he will definitly let them IN

Kindly stop giving ppl wrong ideas to deal in the situation when IMMI guys come..

if they were in need of search warrant, they would get it before coming to your house
No. They are hoping for (and banking on) consensual entry that is granted by Constitutionally ignorant members of the public... or those who are so eager to "cooperate" that they forget that the State is always (always) after bodies.
They usually don't bring that because they know you can't deny their entry into the house
This is 100% wrong. The shell that remains of the Fourth Amendment says otherwise. Please study some basic civics before making incorrect statements. Heed what Lancer says.

AOS Transferred to CSC.......................August 4th 2009

AP/EAD Approval Notice appeared....August 21st 2009

AP/EAD received in mails.................... 08/27/09, 08/31/09

AOS at CSC.............................................Pending

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Why one would say, hey show me the warrant then get in, Why you would go further ahead with the situation when you can settle it down by let them enter into your house.
Read the Fourth & Fifth Amendments in the U.S. Bill of Rights. These (and all of the Ten Amendments) were written precisely to prevent an unfettered State from infringing upon the inalienable rights of the People.
I can tell you, treating them like your guest and cooperating in anyway they want would be more beneficial in your case.
Oh? Cite the exact numbers of people who have done this who enjoyed the "benefits" of having done so, versus those who now regret it deeply.
PPl should cooperate with law especially with Immi laws rather than saying NO in anyways
When Constitutional bounds are being overstepped? Attorneys of all disciplines say otherwise. The U.S. Bill of Rights says otherwise. How are you wiser than they about such matters? Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

why dont you call a press conference and raise this point against ICE?

Sorry to say, but sittin' in front of computer and giving such statement is way easy than done in practical

Simple...it could be detrimental to your case, even if your relationship was bonafide. There is no law that says ICE must be allowed into your home warrantless.

AOS Transferred to CSC.......................August 4th 2009

AP/EAD Approval Notice appeared....August 21st 2009

AP/EAD received in mails.................... 08/27/09, 08/31/09

AOS at CSC.............................................Pending

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Its not anything to first go through with basics , but whoever thinks He's smaters than IMMi guys, he's in a dark side. Kindly go through with the statement I gave. "COOPERATE IN ANWAYS POSSIBLE" Saying "NO" wouldn't do anything but onemore visit may be with some extra IMMi fat guys. They don't tell you nor inform you in advance why they come, you never know what they did find out in your application,

A person who doesn't have anything to hide or worry, he will definitly let them IN

Kindly stop giving ppl wrong ideas to deal in the situation when IMMI guys come..

That's precisely why you should not divulge information or allow them in without an attorney present.

Edited by lancer1655
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Sir I am not being wiser, but educating ppl to cooperate and cooperate. Pardon me, but you are the one claiming that you know A2Z.

Go easy with laws, it will make your life more easier, thats all I know and need to do.

I would be pleased to welcome those guys at my doorstep, if they ever come. Rather than giving them lessons of what's in the laws or not LOL..... :thumbs:

Why one would say, hey show me the warrant then get in, Why you would go further ahead with the situation when you can settle it down by let them enter into your house.
Read the Fourth & Fifth Amendments in the U.S. Bill of Rights. These (and all of the Ten Amendments) were written precisely to prevent an unfettered State from infringing upon the inalienable rights of the People.
I can tell you, treating them like your guest and cooperating in anyway they want would be more beneficial in your case.
Oh? Cite the exact numbers of people who have done this who enjoyed the "benefits" of having done so, versus those who now regret it deeply.
PPl should cooperate with law especially with Immi laws rather than saying NO in anyways
When Constitutional bounds are being overstepped? Attorneys of all disciplines say otherwise. The U.S. Bill of Rights says otherwise. How are you wiser than they about such matters?

AOS Transferred to CSC.......................August 4th 2009

AP/EAD Approval Notice appeared....August 21st 2009

AP/EAD received in mails.................... 08/27/09, 08/31/09

AOS at CSC.............................................Pending

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Raise your voice against ICE knocking without warrant on News...rather than tellin' ppl to take wrong steps

Its not anything to first go through with basics , but whoever thinks He's smaters than IMMi guys, he's in a dark side. Kindly go through with the statement I gave. "COOPERATE IN ANWAYS POSSIBLE" Saying "NO" wouldn't do anything but onemore visit may be with some extra IMMi fat guys. They don't tell you nor inform you in advance why they come, you never know what they did find out in your application,

A person who doesn't have anything to hide or worry, he will definitly let them IN

Kindly stop giving ppl wrong ideas to deal in the situation when IMMI guys come..

That's precisely why you should not divulge information or allow them in without an attorney present.

AOS Transferred to CSC.......................August 4th 2009

AP/EAD Approval Notice appeared....August 21st 2009

AP/EAD received in mails.................... 08/27/09, 08/31/09

AOS at CSC.............................................Pending

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Listen I say this in order to protect those that might ruin there adjustments by misspeaking or having something laying around in the house that is innocent looking but causes them to jump to conclusions.

With an attorney present he can go over your house and verify its contents as well as speak for you so that you do not incriminate yourself.

Edited by lancer1655
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
Sir I am not being wiser, but educating ppl to cooperate and cooperate.
You are advising people to surrender their Constitutional rights.
Pardon me, but you are the one claiming that you know A2Z.
Pardon me, but please look through all of my posts here and copy/paste the line that backs your assertion.

I conclude that you are offering actual or quasi-legal advice that could be very perilous if others were to follow it. Lancer remains entirely correct regarding the prudent way to handle the situation, and with a long-term view.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Sir, how would one ruin his/her adjustments by missspeaking if he's not on fault, only those who aren't keeping true relationship would digg and might say TALK TO MY LAWYER...Honestly speaking, You won't need a lawyer to hit the ball if you can hit them hard. Most of the PPl in here even in real life would agree with the statement that "Allowing laws to work with full cooperation will make any case as clear as you would want to.

I am not being wiser first of all but again "asking everyone to act normal in this situation by let them come in. What's a big deal in it and why we want to make a fuss to argue on anything

Listen I say this in order to protect those that might ruin there adjustments by misspeaking or having something laying around in the house that is innocent looking but causes them to jump to conclusions.

With an attorney present he can go over your house and verify its contents as well as speak for you so that you do not incriminate yourself.

AOS Transferred to CSC.......................August 4th 2009

AP/EAD Approval Notice appeared....August 21st 2009

AP/EAD received in mails.................... 08/27/09, 08/31/09

AOS at CSC.............................................Pending

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
“;}
×
×
  • Create New...