Jump to content

7 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted

I have a question stemming from alot of posts in this forum. If a K1 holder gets married but things fall a part and they never AOS does the Affidavit really apply anymore. Once they go past 90 days they are out of status and illegal no? Doesn't that trump the Affidavit?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted
I have a question stemming from alot of posts in this forum. If a K1 holder gets married but things fall a part and they never AOS does the Affidavit really apply anymore. Once they go past 90 days they are out of status and illegal no? Doesn't that trump the Affidavit?

As far as I know, they have to actually leave the country, in addition to being out of status, before the affidavit would no longer be enforceable. As long as they are still here, then there is still a possibility they could have their legal status restored. For example, they could reconcile with their spouse and apply for AOS late.

That said, if they stayed here and were out of status, they'd be pretty foolish to apply for any means tested benefits, or petition a court for support based on the affidavit. :whistle:

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted (edited)
I have a question stemming from alot of posts in this forum. If a K1 holder gets married but things fall a part and they never AOS does the Affidavit really apply anymore. Once they go past 90 days they are out of status and illegal no? Doesn't that trump the Affidavit?

The I-864 is only valid if the AOS has been approved. If the application is cancelled or denied then the affidavit is non binding. The affidavit submitted for the K1 is not legally binding and that is why everyone has to submit the I-864 when filing for AOS.

Edited by TayRivers
Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted

I was going to say that it seems that in the process of getting benefits they would be singled out and placed in deportation proceedings hence they would never get to actually use the benefit and the affidavit wouldn't come into play. I guess then its always there but its unusable. Kind of like getting a free ticket for a theater in West Berlin while your in the East.

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted
I have a question stemming from alot of posts in this forum. If a K1 holder gets married but things fall a part and they never AOS does the Affidavit really apply anymore. Once they go past 90 days they are out of status and illegal no? Doesn't that trump the Affidavit?

The I-864 is only valid if the AOS has been approved. If the application is cancelled or denied then the affidavit is non binding. The affidavit submitted for the K1 is not legally binding and that is why everyone has to submit the I-864 when filing for AOS.

By the way, I've heard this before. If the K1 affidavit isn't binding why is there at all? Support the logging industry?

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
I have a question stemming from alot of posts in this forum. If a K1 holder gets married but things fall a part and they never AOS does the Affidavit really apply anymore. Once they go past 90 days they are out of status and illegal no? Doesn't that trump the Affidavit?

The I-864 is only valid if the AOS has been approved. If the application is cancelled or denied then the affidavit is non binding. The affidavit submitted for the K1 is not legally binding and that is why everyone has to submit the I-864 when filing for AOS.

By the way, I've heard this before. If the K1 affidavit isn't binding why is there at all? Support the logging industry?

I have no idea why they continue to use it.. But I do know that it can not be upheld in court. Only the I-864 is a binding contract between the sponsor and the US Government.

See page 14 of this link. for full details

www.state.gov/documents/organization/86988.pdf

9 FAM 40.41 N4.6-3 Use of Form I-134, Affidavit of

Support

(CT:VISA-911; 11-02-2007)

a. Because INA 212(a)(4)© and INA 213A require the use of Form I-864,

Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the Act, for so many classes of

immigrants, the use of Form I-134, Affidavit of Support, has been

reduced considerably. Nevertheless, there still are circumstances when

Form I-134 will be beneficial. This affidavit, submitted by the applicant at

your request, is not legally binding on the sponsor and should not be

accorded the same weight as Form I-864. Form I-134 should be given

consideration as one form of evidence, however, in conjunction with the

other forms of evidence mentioned below.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I suspect the I-134 Affidavit of Support is there as an indicator to the Consulate that this relationship has a financial basis upon which to build and thrive. If there is no financial insight then there is no means to pre-determine that someone is likely to become a public burden or have no means of support when in the US. Until the individual is actually a Permanent Resident, however, it is not reasonable to tie them to a non-immigrant for a long term. I suppose the I-134 could be made enforceable for the short-term - that is the sponsor agrees to sponsor them while their I-94 is valid. Then, however, what happens from the time the I-94 expires to the time the AOS is approved - and what happens if the couple doesn't marry and there is no AOS? Once the marriage happens and the foreign partner applies to remain in the US, then it becomes reasonable to have a legally enforceable Affidavit of Support to kick in.

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

. Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...