Gun-Nut Outside Obama Townhall Linked to GOP 'Stop ObamaCare' Effort

[natty bumppo 297]

Maybe some people want the US to become a third world country. That way we can be like them and carry guns in the open.

having difficulty dealing with the law and freedom of speech? and now you're off to involve some other country in this?

[Ban Hammer 13,369]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

At a place where the President of the United States will be present. Yeah. I'm not buying the innocent defender of Freedom bit. It may be his right to carry, but it may also be someone else's right to stay alive should the guy have turned out to be another lunatic.

i musta missed that part of the constitution that forbids having a firearm where potus will be present.

[natty bumppo 297]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

reference charles previous post for an answer .... and why are you racial profiling?

[Ban Hammer 13,369]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

why does he have to be middle eastern?

[HAL 9000 96]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

According to Charles' last post (#17), its suggested that its OK.

Edited August 12, 2009 by HAL 9000

[Ban Hammer 13,369]

reference charles previous post for an answer .... and why are you racial profiling?

must be some of that change.

[Danno 1,228]

Watching that studio conversation was funny.

One small hint: it the "hidden" guns you need to worry about.

[HAL 9000 96]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

At a place where the President of the United States will be present. Yeah. I'm not buying the innocent defender of Freedom bit. It may be his right to carry, but it may also be someone else's right to stay alive should the guy have turned out to be another lunatic.

i musta missed that part of the constitution that forbids having a firearm where potus will be present.

I guess that's why there's laws by jurisdiction and security procedures to be followed when a US President will be somewhere.

Out of curiosity- was this guy present when Obama arrived? I don't have audio today so I can't tell.

[Ban Hammer 13,369]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

According to Charles' last post (#17), its suggested that its OK.

nice change of words there..........

and no, i didn't suggest any such thing. time for your daily reboot.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

why does he have to be middle eastern?

Because you're being coy with your answer. If someone even remotely looked like a possible enemy of the state (signage, weapon, appearance), you can bet that he'd be apprehended and questioned at the very least. The military wouldn't just throw their arms up and say the guy is just exercising his constitutional right. In that situation, they could easily assess it as posing a threat.

It would be no different for the President as Commander in Chief.

[Heracles 417]

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

We know exactly how he would end up.

Only low IQ dipsh-ts carry guns.

Endorsed by the international anyone with an IQ over 75 foundation.

Hold on there son, "interwho"?You know, other countries around this planet called earth. Earth? You lost me son. Constitution says America is earth. Earth is America. Heard it on Ruuuush.

Edited August 12, 2009 by haza

[one...two...tree 2,762]

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

We know exactly how he would end up.

Only low IQ dipsh-ts carry guns.

Endorsed by the international anyone with an IQ over 75 foundation.

Hold on there son, "interwho"?You know, other countries around this planet called earth. Earth? You lost me son. Constitution says America is earth. Earth is America. Heard it on Ruuuush.

I wouldn't say that. I just think that it is a clear security breach for the President as Commander in Chief. The man has every legal right to carry a gun, but not if doing so causing a potential threat to the President. That's all I'm saying.

[HAL 9000 96]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

According to Charles' last post (#17), its suggested that its OK.

nice change of words there..........

and no, i didn't suggest any such thing. time for your daily reboot.

Same logic. A rebuttal of an argument mentioning that a civilian with a weapon in presence of the POTUS as a potential threat by mentioning its absence from the US Constitution isn't really clear and suggests something you may not actually condone.

That's why I'd like to know if the guy was around when Obama was present. I think we can all agree that a security threat to a POTUS is a possibility any day and age.

[Heracles 417]

I wouldn't say that. I just think that it is a clear security breach for the President as Commander in Chief. The man has every legal right to carry a gun, but not if doing so causing a potential threat to the President. That's all I'm saying.

Dude come on. What other developed country allows people to openly carry guns like it's the 1800 wild wild west.

Having a gun at home, I can understand. Don't agree with it either, but I can understand. There is no excuse for anyone, excluding law enforcement, to carry guns in public.

How many presidents need to be killed before the dumb cunts in this country wake up? I feel like defending Obama myself because it's only a matter of time before one of these dumb cunts pulls something off.

Edited August 12, 2009 by haza

[Ban Hammer 13,369]

oh yes, heaven forbid someone is exercising their constitution guaranteed rights and not breaking any laws, yet is subjected to being called a gun nut and worse.

What would happen if a person was hanging just outside of a military base, on private property carrying a gun and a sign that endorsed terrorism? Would you say he's just exercising his constitutional right or would he be posing as a potential threat?

gonna charge him as guilty until proven innocent? or a with a thought crime? or for carrying a sign that has historical references?

So a Middle Eastern looking dude, legally carrying a registered gun and hanging just outside of a military base with a sign that advocates the violent overthrow of our government would just be exercising his constitutional rights?

why does he have to be middle eastern?

Because you're being coy with your answer. If someone even remotely looked like a possible enemy of the state (signage, weapon, appearance), you can bet that he'd be apprehended and questioned at the very least. The military wouldn't just throw their arms up and say the guy is just exercising his constitutional right. In that situation, they could easily assess it as posing a threat.

It would be no different for the President as Commander in Chief.

and you're baiting with ethnicities.