Holocaust Deniers Limbaugh, Beck and Palin...

[Joseph & Ana 0]

You can't substantiate anything you say either. (see cop-outs still work both ways) lets say it over and over... you can't substantiate anything you say... you can't substantiate anything you say....

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Oh I know exactly where, but I want you to obsess and obsess over it until you have a nervous breakdown over it (seems to be working so far)..

Presumably it feeds your psycho-sexual fantasies.

Yes you're exactly right. How did you get so clever? Is that a Western European thing? Amazing.

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

Again with the double standards and hypocracy.. Liberals never have to substantiate what they say. They are the smart ones, and everything they say must be taken at face value. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

You can't substantiate anything you say either. (see cop-outs still work both ways) lets say it over and over... you can't substantiate anything you say... you can't substantiate anything you say....

What was I supposed to substantiate? I asked you a reasonable question a few pages ago (the one about the 98.8% statistic you quoted) - you chose to get defensive and instigate personal attacks.

Oh I know exactly where, but I want you to obsess and obsess over it until you have a nervous breakdown over it (seems to be working so far)..

Presumably it feeds your psycho-sexual fantasies.

Yes you're exactly right. How did you get so clever? Is that a Western European thing? Amazing.

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

Again with the double standards and hypocracy.. Liberals never have to substantiate what they say. They are the smart ones, and everything they say must be taken at face value. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Again with the unsubstantiated stereotypes. For all your talk about how the media has failed the US political system, you seem to be the biggest sucker going.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

More examples of hypocrisy - You're good at illustrating it. After hurling an insult my way, you accuse me of insulting you. Amazing. Double-speak at its finest.

[alienlovechild 75]

Does this new claim share a similar factual basis to the one about Rush's 98.8% accuracy?

I think that's part of his bluster but the man virtually invented mass talk radio and yaks for 3 hours a day. That's pretty impressive for a 20 year period. So far the left hasn't come up with anyone close probably because they've had a lock of other sources of news and entertainment. It's a niche market but a large one.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

More examples of hypocrisy - You're good at illustrating it. After hurling an insult my way, you accuse me of insulting you. Amazing. Double-speak at its finest.

No, that's not what doublespeak means. Read your Orwell again.

Does this new claim share a similar factual basis to the one about Rush's 98.8% accuracy?

I think that's part of his bluster but the man virtually invented mass talk radio and yaks for 3 hours a day. That's pretty impressive for a 20 year period. So far the left hasn't come up with anyone close probably because they've had a lock of other sources of news and entertainment. It's a niche market but a large one.

Rush is the king of that particular medium, I don't think there's any disputing that.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Well, I'd love to go back and forth with you in this foolish game, but i've got to get some sleep. Maybe someone else can take over to keep you occupied. Maybe they can keep up your obsessive 98.8% topic or something else. Have fun goodnight.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

You won't do it because you can't. Your hand has long been revealed. We know where you stand, but I do detect a bit of buyer's remorse in your posts lately

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well, I'd love to go back and forth with you in this foolish game, but i've got to get some sleep. Maybe someone else can take over to keep you occupied. Maybe they can keep up your obsessive 98.8% topic or something else. Have fun goodnight.

Sure - you live to evade another day.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

You won't do it because you can't. Your hand has long been revealed. We know where you stand, but I do detect a bit of buyer's remorse in your posts lately

Oh I can, but I choose not to participate.

Perhaps not for the same reasons as you - because after all someone has to cut you a royalty check before you'll offer an opinion.

As I say - you don't play by your own rules. Until you do - there's no game.

[nowhereman 1]

Rush Limbaugh is a complete moron & nothing he says should be taken seriously. However with that being said he isn't denying that the holocaust happened by labeling Obama a Nazi (he is just making a nonsensical analogy, which is par for the course for him).

It was in response to Nancy Pelosi saying there were people with swastikas in the 'mobs' at the town hall meetings.

Context!!! You should try it actually listening to Rush before you shoot that mouth off.... but you won't.

Not to mention that it's extremely easy to tell when someone complaining about Rush doesn't listen to him. It makes them look foolish and incredible.

True to the political rhetoric double standard only liberals are allowed to conjure up Nazi symbolism among conservatives, not the other way around.

I explained why I don't listen to Rush... pretty much the same reason I tune you out (history of not making sense & spewing nothing but vitriol & rhetoric). I also mentioned that Pike actually did make reference to Rush comparing Obama's policies to Nazism, but of course that flew right over your head.

I tuned you out looooong time ago because you haven't made sense to me since that first hypocritical post you directed to me about how I should never reproduce. So what if Rush compared Obama's policies to Nazism? Liberal pull that sh!t ALL THE TIME, but the only time they are offended by it is when a conservative does it.

You guys remind me of what a relative used to say, that Blacks and a Whites can do the same thing, but Whites think the Blacks are stupid when they do it. You libs are the Whites in that metaphor.

Didn't your mom or 3rd grade teacher tell you about two wrongs not making a right? Right Wing rhetoric & Left Wing Rhetoric are just as bad as one another.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

You won't do it because you can't. Your hand has long been revealed. We know where you stand, but I do detect a bit of buyer's remorse in your posts lately

Oh I can, but I choose not to participate.

Perhaps not for the same reasons as you - because after all someone has to cut you a royalty check before you'll offer an opinion.

As I say - you don't play by your own rules. Until you do - there's no game.

I don't offer opinions. That's a new tack. Listen, you can protest all you want, but it's not like it's any secret that your sentiments are liberal. Do't sweat it. I don't need proof for that. Your posting track record is evidence enough.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Didn't your mom or 3rd grade teacher tell you about two wrongs not making a right? Right Wing rhetoric & Left Wing Rhetoric are just as bad as one another.

When did you figure that out? Between insults? What good does it do you t knw that, but still participate freely in partisan rhetoric?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

No. I don't have to play your game of circular logic. Its a waste of time, not least because you don't play by your own rules.

You won't do it because you can't. Your hand has long been revealed. We know where you stand, but I do detect a bit of buyer's remorse in your posts lately

Oh I can, but I choose not to participate.

Perhaps not for the same reasons as you - because after all someone has to cut you a royalty check before you'll offer an opinion.

As I say - you don't play by your own rules. Until you do - there's no game.

I don't offer opinions. That's a new tack. Listen, you can protest all you want, but it's not like it's any secret that your sentiments are liberal. Do't sweat it. I don't need proof for that. Your posting track record is evidence enough.

Oh its not a new tack, its an old one.

You yourself have said it.

Characterise me however you like, I have no control over that.