Holocaust Deniers Limbaugh, Beck and Palin...

[Joseph & Ana 0]

I never said you were a USC. I simply pointed out your hypocracy, that you expect us not to care about politics, all the while you've been a big part of this conversation.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I never said you were a USC. I simply pointed out your hypocracy, that you expect us not to care about politics, all the while you've been a big part of this conversation.

Where did I say that you or anyone shouldn't care about politics?

All I said was that I'm not invested in it.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

I see, so this statement:

"I'm just wondering if any of the USCs here have a world view that isn't colored by blatant partisanship."

You were just looking for actual raw numbers for your personal statistics collection, rather than labeling Americans with some sort of taint.

[Heracles 417]

I tuned you out looooong time ago because you haven't made sense to me since that first hypocritical post you directed to me about how I should never reproduce. So what if Rush compared Obama's policies to Nazism? Liberal pull that sh!t ALL THE TIME, but the only time they are offended by it is when a conservative does it.

You guys remind me of what a relative used to say, that Blacks and a Whites can do the same thing, but Whites think the Blacks are stupid when they do it. You libs are the Whites in that metaphor.

I realized this years ago when I was attacked for my views. My views were always cut down but never actually proven wrong, never falsified.

I pointed out something along similar lines to what you are saying to one of them today. In their mind, for example, saying you believe libs are naive is the equivalent and warrants a retaliatory personal direct attack. When you catch them out and group them together, due to their similar behavior, they claim your "labeling" or ignorant. It's just strange how the newest member of the gang (clowndal) reacted in exactly the same way anyone of them would react like. Yes even in the first discussion we disagreed with one another. By the third of forth post, the insults started flying. Never spoken to him before but it ended up just like every other debate I have had with someone who has similar strong liberal American views.

My views can be changed or reevaluated on the basis of logic only. Insults are certainly not going to sway me. If someone said the earth is not round but rectangular, I will at least listen to his explanation. I don't just rule people out off the bat. I also don't thrown in insults because I don't agree with him. Whereas, once this guys put you on their list, doesn't matter what you write after that. You're just a moron period and there is nothing you can do to show them otherwise.

Edited August 12, 2009 by haza

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I never said you were a USC. I simply pointed out your hypocracy, that you expect us not to care about politics, all the while you've been a big part of this conversation.

Where did I say that you or anyone shouldn't care about politics?

All I said was that I'm not invested in it.

Not invested? So, why do you show up in every US politics thread?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I see, so this statement:

"I'm just wondering if any of the USCs here have a world view that isn't colored by blatant partisanship."

You were just looking for actual raw numbers for your personal statistics collection, rather than labeling Americans with some sort of taint.

Well looking at these discussions you have to wonder.

There's nothing youve said in this thread that isn't stereotypical.

There's also no shortage or exaggerated labelling. Its very common here - hence my question.

I never said you were a USC. I simply pointed out your hypocracy, that you expect us not to care about politics, all the while you've been a big part of this conversation.

Where did I say that you or anyone shouldn't care about politics?

All I said was that I'm not invested in it.

Not invested? So, why do you show up in every US politics thread?

Its something to talk about.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Just as you have a stereotypical response that all liberals have with your Bush and Rush deranged responses to everything. Your response to everything is, "BUSH, RUSH... BUSH, RUSH!"

Think of something new and creative and then get back with me.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

Edited August 12, 2009 by Sofiyya

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Just as you have a stereotypical response that all liberals have with your Bush and Rush deranged responses to everything. Your response to everything is, "BUSH, RUSH... BUSH, RUSH!"

Think of something new and creative and then get back with me.

Does this new claim share a similar factual basis to the one about Rush's 98.8% accuracy?

You know, the one where you tell me to check out "stuff" and how its "well documented" (only you don't know where).

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

[Joseph & Ana 0]

Oh I know exactly where, but I want you to obsess and obsess over it until you have a nervous breakdown over it (seems to be working so far)..

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Everything can be considered stereotypical. The fact is that someone is wrong. I also happen to enjoy showing them who they are.

How does that work?

None of the ad hominem comments that you've directed towards me in this thread are based on any direct knowledge of me personally or anything I've said - only your assumption of what I must believe based on some cookie cutter conception of a "librul" that you've cooked up in your mind (likely with help from the likes of Rush Limbaugh).

Didn't you just stereotype Rush Limbaugh? Why are you guys so afraid of someone like Rush, who just talks for a living, but who can't take away your money or your rights like this Leftist administration can? What is so frightening about him? Obama tells you to hate conservatives and you do that on que. What am I missing about how these elements are weighted so out of wack with libs?

It would be nice if you could substantiate any of this, but you can't. Its just bluster empty rhetoric. Half of it is vitriolic, the other half is meaningless.

And I thought you knew better than to assume the emotional states of others. I guess not...

Substantiate where you have posted about how big government concerns you.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Oh I know exactly where, but I want you to obsess and obsess over it until you have a nervous breakdown over it (seems to be working so far)..

Presumably it feeds your psycho-sexual fantasies.