Jump to content
mydogjake

affidavit regarding sincere relationship

 Share

22 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
interesting --- that is why I asked... I saw letter of intent on forum -- but nothing as to the "sincere relationship" does the initial filing and then the follow up documents come into play at a later time? Or am I just being taken by an attorney because I am too lazy to do the work myself? Not neccessarily lazy, but quite busy.

I don't think your being taken. (unless your paying, oh I don't know more then 2,000 dollars just for the K1 visa) I wouldn't say they are necessary but they have their value at times. For instances they can make enquirees to division 12 where as you and I cannot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

While I agree that the vast majority of people can get through this process without an attorney, it's bad advice to make the blanket statement that all attorneys are evil, or that everybody can get through this process without one. The reasons that having an attorney would be a good thing have been documented many many MANY times on this site, so I won't go into them. (search is your friend) I do think it's important to mainly address the OP's question, leading them through a dialog about their current situation, rather than just assume they're being taken for a ride. It very well may be that the OP is being mislead, but I think it's preemptive to issue such a verdict at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
While I agree that the vast majority of people can get through this process without an attorney, it's bad advice to make the blanket statement that all attorneys are evil, or that everybody can get through this process without one. The reasons that having an attorney would be a good thing have been documented many many MANY times on this site, so I won't go into them. (search is your friend) I do think it's important to mainly address the OP's question, leading them through a dialog about their current situation, rather than just assume they're being taken for a ride. It very well may be that the OP is being mislead, but I think it's preemptive to issue such a verdict at this point.

Mox

Please note in addition to my editorial comments about attorneys, I did provide the OP a complete description of what is needed, directed him to the place to find it and how to do it. Far be from me to only cast stones at attorneys. Were I to do that, then there would be MORE need for attorneys and less good free advice available. It is my goal in participating in this forum to pass on my experience and study in this area for the purpose of helping others that are doing the same thing I (we) did. Adding editorial comments does not detract from that. I think a review of this thread will show that I was the ONLY responder who gave the OP the detail he needed directly related to his question while others have debated the merits of my opinions (which are my opinions whether you or anyone else agrees or likes it).

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
You were asked this by an attorney who is trying to justify his high price for doing nothing by using fancy words.
NOTHING in the OP's post indicates that an attorney is involved at all. For all we know, Gary, the OP's post could have been in reaction to something that his consulate asked him for, and the post was put in the wrong VJ forum entirely. Can we say "I will jump at no conclusions and avoid flying off the handle" five times in a row really fast?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
You were asked this by an attorney who is trying to justify his high price for doing nothing by using fancy words.
NOTHING in the OP's post indicates that an attorney is involved at all. For all we know, Gary, the OP's post could have been in reaction to something that his consulate asked him for, and the post was put in the wrong VJ forum entirely. Can we say "I will jump at no conclusions and avoid flying off the handle" five times in a row really fast?

The first part of his post proved an attorney was involved. I was right, though if I was wrong about this I would admit it. I jumped to no conclusions, and I have no need to invent non-existent scenarios to justify a non-answer. I KNEW what was happening, I was correct in my knowledge AND my answer to his specific question. NO ONE else has addressed the OPs question but we have many new science fiction scripts to expound on.

Attorneys (and no one else) give out these non-existent assignments to client-victims to justify their existence.

Please Tbone, if your only contribution to the thread is to make up non-existent reasons to attack the only person that answered...isn't the better things for you to do in the Latin American forum? Your advice regarding the Ecuador consulate is pretty good.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
The first part of his post proved an attorney was involved. I was right... I KNEW what was happening
Unless you and the OP communicated privately and he stated to you that an ATTORNEY asked him, the words "I was asked" proves nothing. Please read accurately and interpret literally. Consulates have also been known to ask for such things. And, for the record, if an attorney DID ask, I agree with Mox that the attorney seems to be VERY much on the ball. Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

This topic has gone off course and become a harangue against lawyers based on supposition of the circumstances. The OP stated he had only a few hours in which to receive the answer and that was yesterday. Rather than allow this thread to disintegrate further I am closing it.

Edited by Kathryn41

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

. Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...