Jump to content
one...two...tree

Orly Taitz: The Woman Who Leading The Right Wing Nuts Over Obama's Citizenship

49 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
This crazy b!tch

:rolleyes:

It's a matching book end to her calling Obama an "arrogant jerk from Africa and Indonesia." :rofl: That one is a gem.

So if she's a 'crazy b!tch' for calling him names, what shall we call you for calling her a 'crazy b!tch'?

Let's think about that, shall we?

I would think that given that this woman is behind some sort of lawsuit about the whole birth certificate controversy that such comments aren't exactly in line with what you would expect from a professional attorney.

Calling people names may not be nice, but sometimes it is apt.

Steven isn't putting his professional reputation out there by calling Taitz "a crazy ######", Taitz making blatantly loaded derogatory comments about Obama (and then being behind a lawsuit against him) certainly is.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
This crazy b!tch

:rolleyes:

It's a matching book end to her calling Obama an "arrogant jerk from Africa and Indonesia." :rofl: That one is a gem.

So if she's a 'crazy b!tch' for calling him names, what shall we call you for calling her a 'crazy b!tch'?

Let's think about that, shall we?

:whistle:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
HAL 9000 can sell you one.

Do you have astronaut diplomas???? I wantz one thx :)

HAL 9000 would be delighted to sell you one at a discount.

But does it glow in the dark? :blush:

It can if you wish it enough.

Usually it just glitters.

I know a cute lil baby named Orly!

that is wrong. baby's mother should be executed.

I disagree. Cute name indeed.

Paris-Orly... LOL. Been there.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Country: Netherlands
Timeline
Posted

Steven (Col Bat Guano)

You really have changed your POV in the past few years, because only in 2006 you posted this thread

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...ic=21027&hl=

hailing Lt Watada a 'real deal hero' for following his conscience by not deploying because he felt his orders were 'unlawful' .....NOW another officer is questioning the validity of his orders [from another CIC] and it's all different-what changed your mind so much?

Watada is a hero.

Historically speaking, merely doing ones duty does not equate to heroism or even patriotism. Following what is right and just in your mind is. Sometimes that's the least popular road to take. Imagine the shock on the faces of all those Nazi officers during the Nuremberg trials when they realized that simply following orders doesn't remove you from being guilty of war crimes.

But nobody is ordering him to commit war crimes. I'm not saying that he doesn't have his reasons for not wanting to deploy to Iraq. I'm just saying that in the context of military service he probably doesn't have much of a chance for aquittal.

BTW...there were plenty of German officers that served in the German army in WW2 and did not commit war crimes.

That's not entirely accurate. Yes, he voluntarily joined the military but that doesn't preclude that whatever orders are given to him from that point on are voluntary. If they were, then the military would simply let him choose his deployment. Let me use those soldiers who tortured the prisoners in Abu Graihb (sp) as an example. Were they following orders or were they acting on their own? If they were merely acting on their own then we have a serious problem when our POW camps are being run by renegade soldiers. Now imagine if this Lieutenent were assigned to one of these prisons. At what point is it justifiable to refuse to follow orders? The whole torture fiasco was mired in whether or not it was technically 'legal' to torture. At some point, a soldier has to follow his own conscience to decide what is right and just.

I'm not sure I entirely agree here. The point is that guy did volunteer (voluntarily giving up his civilian freedoms while he is enlisted) - which as I see it makes it rather different than if we were in a draft situation where everyone is forced to go whether they want to or not.

And we're not really tallking about war crimes here - the guy simply refuses point blank to go. That's quite a bit different to refusing illegal orders.

While he probably has no leg to stand on for the initial charges (refusing to be deployed), I'm a little uneasy about the subsequent charges levelled against him, based on his comments about the war and the president.

I understand that premise. My argument is whether or not a soldier and in this case an officer has a moral obligation to stand up for what he believes is right and just or should he be bound by his contract to follow the orders of his superiors? I realize the military cannot function democratically, but to merely be a tool for the commander in chief for his indiscriminate disposal teeters on imperialism. In any case, this soldier is courageous to sacrifice himself because of what he believes in. That's a hero in my book.

Liefde is een bloem zo teer dat hij knakt bij de minste aanraking en zo sterk dat niets zijn groei in de weg staat

event.png

IK HOU VAN JOU, MARK

.png

Take a large, almost round, rotating sphere about 8000 miles in diameter, surround it with a murky, viscous atmosphere of gases mixed with water vapor, tilt its axis so it wobbles back and forth with respect to a source of heat and light, freeze it at both ends and roast it in the middle, cover most of its surface with liquid that constantly feeds vapor into the atmosphere as the sphere tosses billions of gallons up and down to the rhythmic pulling of a captive satellite and the sun. Then try to predict the conditions of that atmosphere over a small area within a 5 mile radius for a period of one to five days in advance!

---

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

I think there's a difference there tmma... between dereliction of duty via refusal to follow orders that may or may not be legal... and dereliction of the chain of command based on frivolous belief informed largely on a dubious reality.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...