White House issues new dire climate report: Scientists: Extreme weather will worsen if pollutants aren't curbed

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

DIRE and EXTREME in the title.

If you have nothing worthwhile to add then you are just trolling.

Well, your useless comment added no value.

Actually it did... yours was just plain stupid. If you're bored go mow the lawn or something.

Let me explain it so even someone of your intelligence can understand.

By using DIRE and EXTREME the Obama administration is using scare tactics. Is this more 'change'?

Most of the people on this thread are making intelligent remarks & you do a drive by with some dumb jab at the Obama administration... this wasn't meant to be a political thread & your remarks so far have contributed nothing of value. Go make your 8th grade level insults in another thread please.

if the white house issued the statement and a thread was made about it, it's a political thread.

That's weak Charles & you know it... Lucky Strike's only intention was to take the thread off topic & make it yet another bash Obama thread. There are 3,982 of those threads already; this one shouldn't be 3,983 (there is actually intelligent discussion going on, for a change).

you can call it weak, but that opinion and $1.50 might get you a cup of coffee somewhere. how many times have we seen any republican news greeted with "fearmongering" "spin" and other derogatory phrases in ot? yet when the words used in the op title of this thread are pointed out, said post is shouted down as anything from the white house is the gospel and not to be questioned.......

your masters must be so proud of you.

Edited June 20, 2009 by charles!

[scandal 951]

[nowhereman 1]

DIRE and EXTREME in the title.

If you have nothing worthwhile to add then you are just trolling.

Well, your useless comment added no value.

Actually it did... yours was just plain stupid. If you're bored go mow the lawn or something.

Let me explain it so even someone of your intelligence can understand.

By using DIRE and EXTREME the Obama administration is using scare tactics. Is this more 'change'?

Most of the people on this thread are making intelligent remarks & you do a drive by with some dumb jab at the Obama administration... this wasn't meant to be a political thread & your remarks so far have contributed nothing of value. Go make your 8th grade level insults in another thread please.

if the white house issued the statement and a thread was made about it, it's a political thread.

That's weak Charles & you know it... Lucky Strike's only intention was to take the thread off topic & make it yet another bash Obama thread. There are 3,982 of those threads already; this one shouldn't be 3,983 (there is actually intelligent discussion going on, for a change).

you can call it weak, but that opinion and $1.50 might get you a cup of coffee somewhere. how many times have we seen any republican news greeted with "fearmongering" "spin" and other derogatory phrases in ot? yet when the words used in the op title of this thread are pointed out, said post is shouted down as anything from the white house is the gospel and not to be questioned.......

your masters must be so proud of you.

Thank you, you just proved my point. Not a single one of my posts in this thread are political in nature & to suggest that I am blindly following Obama is ridiculous to say the least. If you stop with the partisan BS & look at what I actually posted (novel idea, but try it) you will see that I am not 100% sold on GW, but I contend we should err on the side of caution. Please try to actually read what people post next time & don't just dive in with mindless rhetoric.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

DIRE and EXTREME in the title.

If you have nothing worthwhile to add then you are just trolling.

Well, your useless comment added no value.

Actually it did... yours was just plain stupid. If you're bored go mow the lawn or something.

Let me explain it so even someone of your intelligence can understand.

By using DIRE and EXTREME the Obama administration is using scare tactics. Is this more 'change'?

Most of the people on this thread are making intelligent remarks & you do a drive by with some dumb jab at the Obama administration... this wasn't meant to be a political thread & your remarks so far have contributed nothing of value. Go make your 8th grade level insults in another thread please.

if the white house issued the statement and a thread was made about it, it's a political thread.

That's weak Charles & you know it... Lucky Strike's only intention was to take the thread off topic & make it yet another bash Obama thread. There are 3,982 of those threads already; this one shouldn't be 3,983 (there is actually intelligent discussion going on, for a change).

you can call it weak, but that opinion and $1.50 might get you a cup of coffee somewhere. how many times have we seen any republican news greeted with "fearmongering" "spin" and other derogatory phrases in ot? yet when the words used in the op title of this thread are pointed out, said post is shouted down as anything from the white house is the gospel and not to be questioned.......

your masters must be so proud of you.

Thank you, you just proved my point. Not a single one of my posts in this thread are political in nature & to suggest that I am blindly following Obama is ridiculous to say the least. If you stop with the partisan BS & look at what I actually posted (novel idea, but try it) you will see that I am not 100% sold on GW, but I contend we should err on the side of caution. Please try to actually read what people post next time & don't just dive in with mindless rhetoric.

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

[nowhereman 1]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

[nowhereman 1]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

mkay. well i've said something good about obama - ask spooky. now it's your turn to say something bad about him

[nowhereman 1]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

mkay. well i've said something good about obama - ask spooky. now it's your turn to say something bad about him

He sucks at bowling.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

2 The core of a climate model

The Navier-Stokes equations for fluid flow are at the heart of climate models. The first three equations represent Newton's second law and give the acceleration of the winds in the east-west (u), north-south (v) and vertical directions (w). The mass-continuity equation ensures that although the density, speed and direction of the air change as it flows around the Earth, its mass is conserved, while the thermodynamic equation allows heat-transfer processes such as heating by the Sun to be included as a parametrized source term (S). We use the same equations to model the dynamics of the ocean, but usually make further simplifying approximations. In the equations, r is the distance from the Earth's centre, Ω is the angular velocity of the Earth's rotation, φ is latitude, λ is longitude and t is time. c_p is the specific heat capacity of air at constant pressure, θ is potential virtual temperature, Π is the "Exner function" of pressure and ρ is air density. The subscript "d" refers to dry air.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

mkay. well i've said something good about obama - ask spooky. now it's your turn to say something bad about him

He sucks at bowling.

what's his average?

[natty bumppo 297]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

mkay. well i've said something good about obama - ask spooky. now it's your turn to say something bad about him

He sucks at bowling.

what's his average?

got any pics? is he a hooker?

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

mkay. well i've said something good about obama - ask spooky. now it's your turn to say something bad about him

He sucks at bowling.

what's his average?

got any pics? is he a hooker?

fox news just reported he's in the gutter.

[natty bumppo 297]

as you've proved my point about your alleged political nonbias as you're busy defending what the white house spews out. no surprises there either.

I haven't blindly defended Obama & you know it... find one single post in this thread where I did... if you can't (and you won't) just admit you're wrong & move on. I'm so tired of certain VJ posters (VW recently and now you) who make baseless accusations & when asked to provide proof you just circle back & spit out more rhetoric.

i've yet to see you criticize anything he's done. as they say, the proof is in the pudding.

Keep avoiding the issue... you're dead wrong in regards to this thread & you know it. As for Obama he has a lot of things in the works & I've said many times that its too early to assess him because success or failure has yet to be determined. With that being said its no secret that I feel Bush was a horrible President, but I came to that conclusion after he was in office for several years. You & your VJ buds pretty much called Obama's Presidency a failure before he even took office.

However like I said this thread is about global warming, not Obama, so please get

mkay. well i've said something good about obama - ask spooky. now it's your turn to say something bad about him

He sucks at bowling.

what's his average?

got any pics? is he a hooker?

fox news just reported he's in the gutter.

and he can't hit a split ...

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Childish, simply childish!