Jump to content

3 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Even now, millennia after the fall of Troy, Cassandra still can't get no respect. Here's Newsweek's Barrett Sheridan, linking to an interview of Paul Krugman by Will Hutton in the U.K.'s Guardian.

An Interview with Paul Krugman: "The risk of long stagnation is really high." Krugman has become very Cassandra-like lately but he has a Nobel Prize so we more or less have to listen to him.

Cassandra, let us recall for the umpteenth time, was right. The false prophets are the ones you don't want to listen to, like the people who told us markets were efficiently self-regulating.

Ironically, although Krugman does confess that part of "the reason why I am so depressed" is that he's not sure that stabilizing the financial market is "sufficient" to ensure economic recovery, he concludes the interview with the most positive appraisal of the current administration that I've heard from him yet.

Will Hutton: And lastly -- you've been critical about Obama. Your view now?

PK: I'm increasingly happy with him. I was unhappy; I think they could have gotten a bigger stimulus coming out the gate. But they've become more forceful. I would have been more aggressive on the banks; we'll see if we need to re-fight that battle later on.

Healthcare is looking really good. I'm getting increasingly optimistic on healthcare reform. Climate change looks like it's going to happen. So my odds that this will in fact be the kind of New Deal I was hoping for are rising. I had my skepticism, but he is smart. He's impressive. And it is such a relief to have somebody whom you can respect in the White House.

(Krugman was visiting the U.K. to deliver three lectures at the London School of Economics. They can be found here.)

― Andrew Leonard

http://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2009/06/15/...;aim=/tech/htww

Posted
he has a Nobel Prize so we more or less have to listen to him.

He got his Nobel for that New Trade Theory rubbish, not for work on business cycles. So, why should we base policies around his thoughts of business cycles?

People should listen to adherents of F.A. Hayek, who earned his Nobel for his work on business cycles.

Krugman has been meticulously destroyed on by fellow economics PhD Robert Murphy. You can see for yourself here and here

21FUNNY.gif
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...