Shooting in Holocaust museum

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Spring chicken, no more.

Kinky's when you use a feather, perverted is when you use the whole chicken.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Spring chicken, no more.

I never was a spring chicken. I am ageless.

Well, good night. I'll leave you and spooky to enjoy each other. Don't hurt him too much.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Spring chicken, no more.

I never was a spring chicken. I am ageless.

Well, good night. I'll leave you and spooky to enjoy each other. Don't hurt him too much.

He never knows what hit him Good night!

[Sofiyya 1,687]

spooky, do you accept sofi as your domme?

I'm expanding my haram Submissives are welcome.

[ready4ONE 5,400]

re: OP

Wow, how a thread can go wrong, to the bulk of the rest of it...

[almaty 19]

this is vj off topics... a thread always goes wrong

[nowhereman 1]

I've missed a lot since I signed off yesterday... let me address Constellation on a few points:

1. Fox being biased: You admitted yourself that Fox caters to a right of center mentality, so by definition it is biased. Whether or not you agree with the message Fox is presenting is completely irrelevant to this issue... learn to separate the two.

2. Not everyone that disagrees with the right is a liberal... this is a worn out attempt by the right to discredit & discount other points of view. Moderates & even other conservatives often disagree with the right as well.

3. Constantly using liberal commentators (e.g. Olbermann) as a defense of your own far right views just doesn't make any sense... far right & far left are equally as bad.

4. Stop trying to play the victim. You are "ganged up" on because you say stuff that tends to irritate other people. Your buds VW, alienlovechild & Danno do the exact same thing so citing them doesn't really mean anything. It has much less to do with our opinions than how you try to make your point... baiting, insulting & ignoring facts are common tactics that you & your cronies employ. Does it go both ways? Sure it does... but you get what you give.

[Heracles 417]

I've missed a lot since I signed off yesterday... let me address Constellation on a few points:

Great. Look forward to reading them.

1. Fox being biased: You admitted yourself that Fox caters to a right of center mentality, so by definition it is biased. Whether or not you agree with the message Fox is presenting is completely irrelevant to this issue... learn to separate the two.

Why is that biased? I don't think MSNBC is biased either. They cater to their left wing audience. In layman's terms, they discus topics that is of interest to left wing audiences. Fox news discusses topics of interest to right wing views. It is you who confuses the two with being biased. Personally, I could not give a ####### about the daily left wing rights issues. I am interested in topics that actually affect America. So why would I watch MSNBC?

2. Not everyone that disagrees with the right is a liberal... this is a worn out attempt by the right to discredit & discount other points of view. Moderates & even other conservatives often disagree with the right as well.

Fair enough. Even I can see the distinction between a liberal and a traditional democrat. Unfortunately those lines have blurred since the party was hijacked by you know who. Starts with L

3. Constantly using liberal commentators (e.g. Olbermann) as a defense of your own far right views just doesn't make any sense... far right & far left are equally as bad.

No, that is used as an example against those criticizing hosts like O'reilly, Further, I also illustrated the differences between the two. Whether you agree with O'reilly or not, the majority of his show is spent voicing his opinion on issues. Olbermann still spends 50 percent of his show attacking GWB and the other half voicing his opinion of conservatives, ending by continuing to ridicule both them and their view ( EG Worst segment). Second of all, I actually watched Olberman a good 30 + times and gave him the benefit of the doubt before forming any opinion. There are a hell of a lot of people who have not spent 3 minutes watching either the fox news or O'reilly, yet spend 9 hours commenting on it.

4. Stop trying to play the victim. You are "ganged up" on because you say stuff that tends to irritate other people. Your buds VW, alienlovechild & Danno do the exact same thing so citing them doesn't really mean anything. It has much less to do with our opinions than how you try to make your point... baiting, insulting & ignoring facts are common tactics that you & your cronies employ. Does it go both ways? Sure it does... but you get what you give.

Who is playing the victim? To play the victim I have to feel offended, I am not. What I am doing is pointing out the mob mentality here whose sole purpose is to antagonize and insult others. Unfortunately, there is no way to point this out without sounding like I am complaining or whining. The only wine you will see out of me is a nice $100 Wolf Blass from Aus and that is on the dinner table.

Once again, here is a typical example of a conversation that you guys adamantly deny:

Poster A: I in my opinion ABC...

Resident clowns: Ha ha abc

Poster A: Well, I believe in ABC because of (insert handful of sentences)

Resident clowns: That is duuuuumb

Poster A: Why? xyz supports abc and so on.

Resident clowns: (Attack mode) shutup yu idot fool.

And then the game begins somehow ending with poster a having to both defend themselves as well as lower themselves to respond to the antagonizing and witty comments. Moreover, and without fail you guys succeed in pushing the poster and somehow they get suspended and end up looking like the bad guy. Or are you going to deny that happens?

Essentially , the same group of clowns manage to ridicule the poster without ever addressing or supporting why they are correct. Further, the mentality behind this is easy to understand. Some have spent their entire lives in this section, so when someone comes a long and wants to have a serious discussion, it basically bothers them. Why? because they don't care, which they have flat out stated, time and time again. It must be a coincidence that one of their names will appear in every single thread.

Edited June 11, 2009 by Constellation

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Oh for God's sake - give it a rest already

Same old whiny-#### tune. Over and over and over and OVER again!

Seriously - STFU.

[Heracles 417]

Oh for God's sake - give it a rest already

Same old whiny-#### tune. Over and over and over and OVER again!

Seriously - STFU.

So you basically just proved my point.

Why don't you say that to my face? Nope, you prefer to camp here and use your only avenue of power, the VJ forums. Truly you are a loser.

Edited June 11, 2009 by Constellation

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

It's not like my name was a secret, but no one ever used it.

refrained from saying it as it wasn't used in open forum.

Steven,

None of your images work.

they are democrats too.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Pike....don't post it. Just walk away....for sanity's sake.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Yes BY - its all a big conspiracy.

You are the innocent victim, innocently plying your well-thought out, straightforward opinions and are set upon by those beastly liberals. Not one thing you say or do is provocative or insulting and you are always the recipient of insults, never the instigator.

You need to take a big step back and look at how you come across.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

[Heracles 417]

Yes BY - its all a big conspiracy.

You are the innocent victim, innocently plying your well-thought out, straightforward opinions and are set upon by those beastly liberals. Not one thing you say or do is provocative or insulting and you are always the recipient of insults, never the instigator.

You need to take a big step back and look at how you come across.

No conspiracy mate. The OT section of VJ is your life. Did I say I was a victim? I also don't care how I come across. If I did, I wouldn't say it in the tone I do. I have also been much more honest that most of you. Apart from living in Jersey and working in the media or publishing (even that is vague), I know nothing about you.

Like your buds here, you cannot differentiate between opinion to personal insult. Refer to the example I gave you above again. Suggesting Britts are metrosexuals is totally different to specifically posting Private Pike is a w--k-r. You don't seem to be able to differentiate between the two. In your mind, the first statement is the equivalent of the latter.

Now, I can be offensive too but it will get me suspended. Whereas you prefer to exploit your only ability, under the radar witty remarks.

This all started with my view on crime and minorities. To this day neither you nor your buds have discredited it using actual facts, however, you still believe you are right and I am wrong. Why? ultimately because you say so. Therefore, that is good enough. When someone challenges you on this, attack mode is turned on.

Edited June 11, 2009 by Constellation