Work begins on nation's largest mass transit project

[Susita 175]

My company offered me a place in NYC with the appropriate living expenses paid but I was like thanks but no f--n way thanks. I like cities, just not NYC.

NYC kicks a$$

You missed out.

Sucks for you.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

My company offered me a place in NYC with the appropriate living expenses paid but I was like thanks but no f--n way thanks. I like cities, just not NYC.

NYC kicks a$$

You missed out.

Sucks for you.

love that new york chutzpah girl!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I prefer London actually - but only cause I'm more familiar with it.

[Niels Bohr 72]

Anyone interesting in watching The Final Destination movie that is coming out?

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Anyone interesting in watching The Final Destination movie that is coming out?

Another one?

[Heracles 417]

Six, once someone is onto your game they realize you are not even a challenge. At least uscandal, for example, posts a bit of proof to back his comments. Whereas, you feel that just by saying someone is wrong, that your opinion is more valid than theirs.

The way normal people have a discussion is as follows:

Person A: I think Koalas are more intelligent than otters

Person B: I disagree, I believe Otters are more intelligent

>> Conversation develops and evidence (research) is thrown into the equations

A conversation with you.

Person A: same comment

Private Pike (Six): Well you are wrong and an idiot

Person A: Why is that? Your comments also do nothing to prove me wrong

Private Pike (Six): Stop whining you idiot.

>> Groups jumps in to defend their g/f. Add to the insults

>> person gets tired of dealing with someone of limited cranial capacity and either leaves or throws out an insult and is suspended

In 'your mind', the latter is a perfectly valid conversation.

Edited June 9, 2009 by Constellation

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Perhaps a state transition diagram is in order, to better illustrate the point.

[Heracles 417]

Says you?

Say no says I.

No "says" your 100 posts where you criticize the mass media.

Perhaps a state transition diagram is in order, to better illustrate the point.

Any diagram will do really. They just need to illustrate the following: Six = full of #######

To this day if you asked me to summarize what six actually believes in (or stands for), I wouldn't have the slightest idea. His opinions are like a dutch door.

I could even list a few points for you but when it comes to him, nothing, Nada, zilch. He's had more stances than a Chicago politician caught with a hooker.

Edited June 9, 2009 by Constellation

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Six, once someone is onto your game they realize you are not even a challenge. At least uscandal, for example, posts a bit of proof to back his comments. Whereas, you feel that just by saying someone is wrong, that your opinion is more valid than theirs.

The way normal people have a discussion is as follows:

Person A: I think Koalas are more intelligent than otters

Person B: I disagree, I believe Otters are more intelligent

>> Conversation develops and evidence (research) is thrown into the equations

A conversation with you.

Person A: same comment

Private Pike (Six): Well you are wrong and an idiot

Person A: Why is that? Your comments also do nothing to prove me wrong

Private Pike (Six): Stop whining you idiot.

>> Groups jumps in to defend their g/f. Add to the insults

>> person gets tired of dealing with someone of limited cranial capacity and either leaves or throws out an insult and is suspended

In 'your mind', the latter is a perfectly valid conversation.

I love your distorted perspective there BY. You are very much the perpetual victim aren't you

[Heracles 417]

I love your distorted perspective there BY. You are very much the perpetual victim aren't you

Ah is that what it is.

Not the fact that you accuse me of thinking I am the best yet you are the one who believes their opinion is holier than thou. If six says it's wrong, it bloody well is wrong.

If someone says the world is flat you prove them wrong.

Calling them an idiot and hurling insults, as you do so well with others here, does not prove you are right.

Edited June 9, 2009 by Constellation

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

No "says" your 100 posts where you criticize the mass media.

Only 100? And what a suspiciously exact number. Its good that you keep count - if you didn't, someone might think (unfairly) that you were talking out of your brown eye

To this day if you asked me to summarize what six actually believes in (or stands for), I wouldn't have the slightest idea. His opinions are like a dutch door.

I could even list a few points for you but when it comes to him, nothing, Nada, zilch. He's had more stances than a Chicago politician caught with a hooker.

But you just said you'd try to run half of everything I ever said past your "Pom" mates (in fact, you've said before that you have done exactly this. I think you need to make up your mind as to whether you've done this already or whether you intend to do it at some undetermined point in the future. As I said it wouldn't do for someone to unfairly label you as an #######-talker

I love your distorted perspective there BY. You are very much the perpetual victim aren't you

Ah is that what it is.

Not the fact that you accuse me of thinking I am the best yet you are the one who believes their opinion is holier than thou. If six says it's wrong, it bloody well is wrong.

Yep that's right BY - your analysis is on-point and insightful as always.

Just remember: US = $hit. Australia = "The" Holy Land (as opposed to that other pansy holy land in the ME).

[Susita 175]

love that new york chutzpah girl!

Born & raised, it's in the blood.

[Heracles 417]

But you just said you'd try to run half of everything I ever said past your "Pom" mates (in fact, you've said before that you have done exactly this. I think you need to make up your mind as to whether you've done this already or whether you intend to do it at some undetermined point in the future. As I said it wouldn't do for someone to unfairly label you as an #######-talker

Your points make no sense and certainly don't sound like they are coming from someone who lived the majority of their life in a country which is almost the polar opposite to that of America.

Second of all, you barely have a stance on any topic apart from some cliche like everyone is the same (culture / attitude wise) or the media likes to blow things out of proportion. Things that just so happen to be topics you have no interest in nor agree with.

Edited June 9, 2009 by Constellation

[Susita 175]

Just remember: US = $hit. Australia = "The" Holy Land (as opposed to that other pansy holy land in the ME).

If you're serious, I beg to differ. The US is the only place where you can spot Jesus on a pierogi. You can't get any holier than that.

I get lost in the sarcasm in these forums.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

But you just said you'd try to run half of everything I ever said past your "Pom" mates (in fact, you've said before that you have done exactly this. I think you need to make up your mind as to whether you've done this already or whether you intend to do it at some undetermined point in the future. As I said it wouldn't do for someone to unfairly label you as an #######-talker

Your points make no sense and certainly don't sound like they are coming from someone who lived the majority of their life in a country which is almost the polar opposite to that of America.

Second of all, you barely have a stance on any topic apart from some cliche like everyone is the same or the media likes to blow things out of proportion. Things that just so happen to be topics you have no interest in nor agree with.

Its hard to know how to respond to any of this - as it conjures an image in mind of Harry from Harry and the Hendersons trying to figure out how to make an omelette.

I can get you a discount on "Complete Dummies" guides (no $hit).