'Gay' gene claim suddenly vanishes

[Peikko 1,575]

Probably, it's been wandering in and out of here all afternoon.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Please. just dont put the I'm a ** shite on me! do it on your own time.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

they are doing it on their own time.

it just so happens that their time happens to also be your time and my time.

you see, time is communist. it belongs to all of us. theres no ownership of time. theres no my time or your time or his time. theres just time.

[Ban Hammer 13,110]

Well, that's not true Charles, but that isn't the only reason why bigamy is illegal. However, leaving the complex legal problems that plural marriages create, in terms of equality a plural marriage is almost inevitably going to produce a complex set of emotions that are simply not present within monogamous marriage. It is very hard for me to imagine a plural marriage where the rights of one of the parties are not somehow infringed because of the unbalanced nature of the relationship.

don't be so narrow minded. as long as all parties are of legal age and consent, what's the problem really?

they are doing it on their own time.

it just so happens that their time happens to also be your time and my time.

you see, time is communist. it belongs to all of us. theres no ownership of time. theres no my time or your time or his time. theres just time.

time is now socialized, and i'm taking some of yours

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

take more, i have lots

[spookyturtle 9,465]

You really are nuts, aren't you Danno? Your last post confirms it, should there have been any shadow of doubt.

It took you this long to figure that out?

[spookyturtle 9,465]

they are doing it on their own time.

it just so happens that their time happens to also be your time and my time.

you see, time is communist. it belongs to all of us. theres no ownership of time. theres no my time or your time or his time. theres just time.

Did Obama do that too? Damn, that dude is messin' with everything.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

he's even colored the clocks red

[Danno 1,228]

You can design any version of marriage you like, that suits you Danno, but as soon as your design impinges on the rights of others you're in deep do do.

Think about people's rights when you think about what is wrong with pedophilia by the way. It's not illegal because people think the idea is 'yucky'.

A. I didn't raise Pedophilia in my argument, why did you?

B."the rights of others" was one of my points.

Who are you to bless gays with designing marriage as they want... and then you close the door on everyone else?

Either this "Right" exists for all .....or it exists at the "will of the majority" so they can draw bounds. (I think it's the later)

You really are nuts, aren't you Danno? Your last post confirms it, should there have been any shadow of doubt.

It took you this long to figure that out?

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Why doesnt Obama just build Iran a nuke plant and get it over with.

[Peikko 1,575]

Well, that's not true Charles, but that isn't the only reason why bigamy is illegal. However, leaving the complex legal problems that plural marriages create, in terms of equality a plural marriage is almost inevitably going to produce a complex set of emotions that are simply not present within monogamous marriage. It is very hard for me to imagine a plural marriage where the rights of one of the parties are not somehow infringed because of the unbalanced nature of the relationship.

don't be so narrow minded. as long as all parties are of legal age and consent, what's the problem really?

they are doing it on their own time.

it just so happens that their time happens to also be your time and my time.

you see, time is communist. it belongs to all of us. theres no ownership of time. theres no my time or your time or his time. theres just time.

time is now socialized, and i'm taking some of yours

Where is the narrowness of mind Charles? A relationship with more than one partner is necessarily a totally different type of relationship than a monogamous one. They are not equivalent in any way. While it may be possible to have a multiple partner relationship that does not inevitably result in a power struggle and an infringement of at least one of the participants rights, I don't see it. Perhaps you can explain how that would be possible?

You can design any version of marriage you like, that suits you Danno, but as soon as your design impinges on the rights of others you're in deep do do.

Think about people's rights when you think about what is wrong with pedophilia by the way. It's not illegal because people think the idea is 'yucky'.

A. I didn't raise Pedophilia in my argument, why did you?

B."the rights of others" was one of my points.

Who are you to bless gays with designing marriage as they want... and then you close the door on everyone else?

Either this "Right" exists for all .....or it exists at the "will of the majority" so they can draw bounds. (I think it's the later)

You really are nuts, aren't you Danno? Your last post confirms it, should there have been any shadow of doubt.

It took you this long to figure that out?

You wondered why we don't allow adults to marry children. That's pedophilia by any other name, no?

[spookyturtle 9,465]

Why doesnt Obama just build Iran a nuke plant and get it over with.

It would help put more American's to work.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Well, that's not true Charles, but that isn't the only reason why bigamy is illegal. However, leaving the complex legal problems that plural marriages create, in terms of equality a plural marriage is almost inevitably going to produce a complex set of emotions that are simply not present within monogamous marriage. It is very hard for me to imagine a plural marriage where the rights of one of the parties are not somehow infringed because of the unbalanced nature of the relationship.

don't be so narrow minded. as long as all parties are of legal age and consent, what's the problem really?

they are doing it on their own time.

it just so happens that their time happens to also be your time and my time.

you see, time is communist. it belongs to all of us. theres no ownership of time. theres no my time or your time or his time. theres just time.

time is now socialized, and i'm taking some of yours

Where is the narrowness of mind Charles? A relationship with more than one partner is necessarily a totally different type of relationship than a monogamous one. They are not equivalent in any way. While it may be possible to have a multiple partner relationship that does not inevitably result in a power struggle and an infringement of at least one of the participants rights, I don't see it. Perhaps you can explain how that would be possible?

Cleo maybe a trip to the zoo might do ya!

[Peikko 1,575]

How is your right to be married infringed by the right of a homosexual couple to be married?

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Why doesnt Obama just build Iran a nuke plant and get it over with.

It would help put more American's to work.

How is your right to be married infringed by the right of a homosexual couple to be married?

I am what I am! dont matter if I'm ** or not! I LIVE!