Jump to content

23 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

When Defense Secretary Robert Gates endorsed President Obama's policies on torture and closing the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Republicans were unmoved. Gates doesn't count, they said. He may have been Bush's Pentagon chief, but he's not a neocon, and he now serves at Obama's pleasure. When Colin Powell (Bush cabinet) endorsed the same policies, Republicans were still unconvinced. Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a Bush appointee, doesn't count, either.

Fine. How about David Petraeus?

General David Petraeus said this past weekend that President Obama's decision to close down Gitmo and end harsh interrogation techniques would benefit the United States in the broader war on terror.

In an appearance on Radio Free Europe Sunday, the man hailed by conservatives as the preeminent military figure of his generation left little room for doubt about where he stands on some of Obama's most contentious policies.

Indeed, Petraeus seemed to reject the Republican arguments altogether, embracing only those interrogation techniques "that are completely in line with the Geneva Convention." The administration's plan for Guantanamo, Petraeus added "sends an important message to the world, as does the commitment of the United States to observe the Geneva Convention when it comes to the treatment of detainees."

Sam Stein added, "The remarks appear to be the first from Petraeus since the closure of Guantanamo and Bush Administration use of enhanced interrogation techniques became hot-button partisan issues. They couldn't come at a better time for Obama."

Now, I've been critical at times of Petraeus (and Powell, for the matter), and I'm not suggesting their arguments have merit only when I agree with their conclusions.

The point is that Petraeus' position makes the Republican attacks that much less credible. In most GOP circles, there's practically a religious reverence for Petraeus, and yet he now seems to have no use for the right's single most important arguments of the day.

As a matter of policy, Obama is obviously right and his detractors are clearly wrong. But as a matter of political optics, we're now dealing with a situation in which the president's position -- the one the right thinks is dangerous, naive, and terrorist-friendly -- has been endorsed by Bush's Defense Secretary (Gates), Bush's chairman of the Joint Chiefs (Mullen), Bush's Secretary of State (Powell), and the general Bush tapped to head U.S. Central Command (Petraeus).

On the other side, we have Newt Gingrich, ####### Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, and some craven members of Congress.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
On the other side, we have Newt Gingrich, ####### Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, and some craven members of Congress.

And the usual coterie of bloodthirsty, traitorous (as evidenced by their support for secessionist scum like Governor Perry) anti-American scumbags on VJ.

Git off Obama's teet, son! Cheney owned that boy!

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Steven, when are you going to learn and / or accept that Limbaugh, Cheney, Hannity and Gingrich are the only true Republicans anymore? Sheesh.

You mean Gen. Petraeus is really a skirt wearing communist pinko underneath that uniform of his? :unsure:

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Steven, when are you going to learn and / or accept that Limbaugh, Cheney, Hannity and Gingrich are the only true Republicans anymore? Sheesh.

You mean Gen. Petraeus is really a skirt wearing communist pinko underneath that uniform of his? :unsure:

Isn't that obvious from his support of Obama's dangerous approach to national security issues?

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

You'd think somebody would know about the chain-of-command and where General Petraeus fits in. Obama is his superior and previous generals have been dismissed for publically disgreeing with the president.

Again, its a dumb issue that has little relevance to the current battlefield except maybe as a negative and you'll notice he didn't say squat about releasing more photos to drum up support for enemy morale.

David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You'd think somebody would know about the chain-of-command and where General Petraeus fits in. Obama is his superior and previous generals have been dismissed for publically disgreeing with the president.

Again, its a dumb issue that has little relevance to the current battlefield except maybe as a negative and you'll notice he didn't say squat about releasing more photos to drum up support for enemy morale.

You know that's essentially the argument that some Lefties made when Gen. Petraeus gave his opinion to Congress about Iraq. It's funny how the shoe fits now.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
Torture, don't torture, whatever.

Jack Bauer will still find a way to get information out of you. :whistle:

He wouldn't get anything out of Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris counted to infinity - twice.

There is no chin behind Chuck Norris’ beard. There is only another fist.

Contrary to popular belief, America is not a democracy, it is a Chucktatorship. :thumbs:

http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com/

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Torture, don't torture, whatever.

Jack Bauer will still find a way to get information out of you. :whistle:

He wouldn't get anything out of Chuck Norris.

Chuck Norris counted to infinity - twice.

There is no chin behind Chuck Norris' beard. There is only another fist.

Contrary to popular belief, America is not a democracy, it is a Chucktatorship. :thumbs:

http://www.chucknorrisfacts.com/

Yeah...take that Eddie Bauer!

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You know that's essentially the argument that some Lefties made when Gen. Petraeus gave his opinion to Congress about Iraq. It's funny how the shoe fits now.

Wrong shoe size again. MoveOn.org slammed the general BEFORE he even testified before Congress.

Also all this stuff about detainee dates to 2004 and before and has little impact now beyond what I already told you. It's far more accurate to say Obama has adopted most of Bush's foreign policy and kept many of the same people in charge of their respective positions.

David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)
You know that's essentially the argument that some Lefties made when Gen. Petraeus gave his opinion to Congress about Iraq. It's funny how the shoe fits now.

Wrong shoe size again. MoveOn.org slammed the general BEFORE he even testified before Congress.

Also all this stuff about detainee dates to 2004 and before and has little impact now beyond what I already told you. It's far more accurate to say Obama has adopted most of Bush's foreign policy and kept many of the same people in charge of their respective positions.

My point is that you are saying it is a given that Gen. Petraeus' opinion will always be politically motivated, so it doesn't matter whether you criticize his opinion before or after he gives it. In other words, your position is really no different than those who dismissed his opinion as being political back when his Commander in Chief was Bush.

Edited by Col. 'Bat' Guano
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...