Few leads in slaying of Ventura County family

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Charles, in your opinion - do you think the perpetrator went there with a motive or do you think was just some random killing?

[Ban Hammer 13,364]

Charles, in your opinion - do you think the perpetrator went there with a motive or do you think was just some random killing?

yes

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Charles, in your opinion - do you think the perpetrator went there with a motive or do you think was just some random killing?

yes

...too cute for words.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Charles, in your opinion - do you think the perpetrator went there with a motive or do you think was just some random killing?

yes

...too cute for words.

You didn't get suspended for last night but I did the night before for doing the same thing. I told you the mods liked you.

Edited May 22, 2009 by spookyturtle

[Ban Hammer 13,364]

Charles, in your opinion - do you think the perpetrator went there with a motive or do you think was just some random killing?

yes

...too cute for words.

well you asked.

given several tidbits in the story - i too think the perp knew the family (hence the motorcycle helmet). also nothing about anything noticed to be missing. those two items make it quite plausible that the guy knew the family and went there to kill them, quite probably just the woman as she was his first victim. the husband next as he was home and it was either take him out or run a serious risk of being id'ed.

note the kids were not killed - debatable if this was due to them leaving or if he chose not to take them out.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Charles, in your opinion - do you think the perpetrator went there with a motive or do you think was just some random killing?

yes

...too cute for words.

well you asked.

given several tidbits in the story - i too think the perp knew the family (hence the motorcycle helmet). also nothing about anything noticed to be missing. those two items make it quite plausible that the guy knew the family and went there to kill them, quite probably just the woman as she was his first victim. the husband next as he was home and it was either take him out or run a serious risk of being id'ed.

note the kids were not killed - debatable if this was due to them leaving or if he chose not to take them out.

That's the kind of response I was looking for. Good post!