Jump to content

92 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

While you embrace empty rhetoric, I'm basing my opinion on what I've read by counter terrorist experts. But please, continue framing me as the one with the ideological bias. Feel free to find it for yourself. ;)

Filed: Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

While you embrace empty rhetoric, I'm basing my opinion on what I've read by counter terrorist experts. But please, continue framing me as the one with the ideological bias. Feel free to find it for yourself. ;)

No need. You have already done that on your own. :lol:

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
Precisely what I like about him. He's no saint, and he is not going to always do the 'right thing' but I do not want an idealogue in power, they are the nuttiest and most dangerous sort.

Yeah he is looking a bit Tony Blair these days - the stock standard of smarmy politician.

Not a nutjob, and not the "most liberal ever" guff that people were trapping off about.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

While you embrace empty rhetoric, I'm basing my opinion on what I've read by counter terrorist experts. But please, continue framing me as the one with the ideological bias. Feel free to find it for yourself. ;)

No need. You have already done that on your own. :lol:

Come on, Bill - where's your copy and paste skills at today? Find some expert counter terrorists studies or opinion that back up your claim. God forbid anyone here think that you base your opinion on empty rhetoric.

Filed: Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

While you embrace empty rhetoric, I'm basing my opinion on what I've read by counter terrorist experts. But please, continue framing me as the one with the ideological bias. Feel free to find it for yourself. ;)

No need. You have already done that on your own. :lol:

Come on, Bill - where's your copy and paste skills at today? Find some expert counter terrorists studies or opinion that back up your claim. God forbid anyone here think that you base your opinion on empty rhetoric.

No, I will let the obvious speak for itself.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

While you embrace empty rhetoric, I'm basing my opinion on what I've read by counter terrorist experts. But please, continue framing me as the one with the ideological bias. Feel free to find it for yourself. ;)

No need. You have already done that on your own. :lol:

Come on, Bill - where's your copy and paste skills at today? Find some expert counter terrorists studies or opinion that back up your claim. God forbid anyone here think that you base your opinion on empty rhetoric.

No, I will let the obvious speak for itself.

You coming up empty handed without any substance to back up your claim speaks volumes. ;)

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

For anyone not blinded by ideology, should read this:

http://counterterrorismblog.org/Reforming%...20Event%202.pdf

Budget: Adequate funding for the counterterrorism foreign assistance programs is a real problem, even

after 9/11. Since 2002, the program’s budget has fluctuated, cut in some years and increased in others.

The actual FY 2008 allocation for ATA, made by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) and the State Department after Congress cut the overall Foreign Assistance Budget request, was

back down to a total of $128.5 million. The FY 2009 level and carried over by the Continuing resolution is

$141.5 million, although about $17 million of the budget is earmarked for Afghanistan and will fund,

among other items, protection for the President of Afghanistan.

Decreases in ATA funding, have generally resulted from funding request cuts made by the State

Department budget office, then OMB, and finally by the Congressional Appropriations Committee as

part of the struggle between competing priorities for scarce dollars. When the terrorist threat seems

less prominent in the perception of budget officers and Congress, funding for overseas counterterrorism

programs typically assumes a lower priority. For example, as I related in my book, The Evolution of US

Counterterrorism Policies when I asked a House Appropriations Committee staffer a couple of years ago

why the Committee increased spending for the de‐mining program but cut ATA, she replied, “We

received more letters about de‐mining.”3

Filed: Timeline
Posted
You have to admit, that by keeping most of the Bush anti-terrorism policies intact, America has been spared another attack since Obama took office.

Rhetorical BS. Read what counter terrorists have said regarding worldwide attacks and the general safety of the U.S. from terrorist attacks. There are still numerous targets of vulnerability which were pointed out in the 911 Commission that were all but ignored by the Bush Administration. Hell, they didn't even want to recognize the validity of the findings from that Commission until they realized the political backlash from not doing so.

I knew that would smoke you out. You haven't left Obama. Obama left you.

While you embrace empty rhetoric, I'm basing my opinion on what I've read by counter terrorist experts. But please, continue framing me as the one with the ideological bias. Feel free to find it for yourself. ;)

No need. You have already done that on your own. :lol:

Come on, Bill - where's your copy and paste skills at today? Find some expert counter terrorists studies or opinion that back up your claim. God forbid anyone here think that you base your opinion on empty rhetoric.

No, I will let the obvious speak for itself.

You coming up empty handed without any substance to back up your claim speaks volumes. ;)

You really do need a hug, don't you?

group-hug.jpg

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...