Court & Police Records for IMBRA

[AndyMisiu 0]

Hi everyone,

I know I've been beating this site up with criminal history questions that no one really has an answer to yet, but here is another one. On the I-129F instructions for filling the form it states to include all court and police records showing charges and disposition. On the acctual application it just asks you to attach a separate piece of paper with information relating to the crime involved, date of conviction, and sentence.

I went to all the court houses and got certified copies of the records. The records show the Case history, including all charges, dispositions, dates, and sentences. Plus I'm going to attach a separate piece of paper explaining it all. Plus I will send any copies of original charging papers and whatever else I can dig up.

My charges all stemmed from Part C: question #3: alcohol related

Do you think this should be enough for the USCIS?

[AndyMisiu 0]

I'm just asking for an opinion!! 43 hits and no opinion? help a brother out!!!

[JenT 0]

The instructions for filing are the most comprehensive. Follow them. Good luck.

Jen

[michellek1976 0]

I noticed the ambiguity in what was stated in form and what was stated in instructions. I would say best to give everything asked for in their different references rather than holding something back and risking getting a further RFE or whatever they would do if they feel you haven't complied with request.

At this point they probably aren't sure themselves. I asked Sydney consulate if I should abandon I-129F application in favor of Direct Consular Filing - event they said they have no idea when to expect any approved petitions after IMBRA RFEs.

What a rollercoaster.

[aussiewench 9]

The instructions for filing are the most comprehensive. Follow them. Good luck.

Jen

I agree. Hence why they have separate instructions.

[ScottishHighlands 0]

Regarding Match.com and Yahoo...these two companies warned Senator Maria Cantwell that there would be major political war if they were not excluded from the IMBRA Nuernberg Law on Race and Citizenship. So the racist law says that a website with more than 50% foreigners is an IMB. That excludes Match and Yahoo as an IMB and you can say No on the form.

Of course, I would say No on the form no matter what. The fine is $10,000 if you get caught? The feminists don't have the balls to try to enforce this.

Plus, there is already a Restraining Order on IMBRA. The DHS is acting illegally by releasing these forms.

If the government can disregard a judge's restraining order, you can just sign No on the form.

Or better yet, launch a quick lawsuit asking for a restraining order on the DHS.

Check out www.garybala.com and www.online-dating-rights.com as well as www.imbra.org and www.veteransabroad.com.

Don't take IMBRA lying down.

[ScottishHighlands 0]

By the way Jen,

Your life with David will be hampered by a law that is now caught in the middle of furious lawsuits and supposedly under restraining order (which the DHS is ignoring). I am one of the people involved in planning the various lawsuits that can be expected to hold up everyone's visas.

An American woman who doesn't agree with the insane law, should file a quick lawsuit specifically asking for a restraining order on the DHS.

If American women start getting visas for their west European fiances faster than American men getting visas for Russian or Eastern European fiances...there will be even more lawsuits.

The men affected will make it hard for everyone as long as IMBRA exists.

Meanwhile, gays are excluded from getting visas to visit American partners. The list of people who will be persecuted in the future will only grow now that IMBRA was allowed to persecute the politically unpopular group called "heterosexual white male."

IMBRA will pave the way for regulation of Match.com and Yahoo and all domestic dating sites. Women who have been abused by male Yahoo members can and should file lawsuits...so Americans can finally get legal precedents set regardling relationships.

The Ohio judge in one IMBRA lawsuit, ruling temporarily in favor of IMBRA, said "The Supreme Court has never explicitly recognized a fundamental liberty interest in Americans meeting foreigners for intimate relationships."

If those words don't frighten you...if your hatred toward Russian women is so strong that you don't see the meaning of those words...than you and envision two entirely different worlds and Americas going into the so-called Independence Day Weekend.

Soon, the IMBRA precedent can be used to ask if you and your fiance ever went to an anti-war rally...etc, etc.

Personally, I am in favor of blocking the immigration of anyone who has ever stated that they like to see US soldiers killed in Iraq. But I would shudder at actually getting a law passed on that subject.

Future laws, if IMBRA is upheld in the current legal battle, will certainly punish anyone who met in an Internet chat room.

It simply is none of the government's business to imply that those who met on an Internet site should be punished.

Edited June 29, 2006 by ScottishHighlands

[Imbra2005 0]

Somebody please buy these guys a clue! There is no restraining order on IMBRA. The govt. cannot enforce certain provisions against a single mail order bride company temporarily. And once the federal judge in Ohio came out with his ruling practically laughing them out of court, the mail order bride companies picked up their marbles, and went home crying.

[ScottishHighlands 0]

[And once the federal judge in Ohio came out with his ruling practically laughing them out of court, the mail order bride companies picked up their marbles, and went home crying.]

She is referring to the court cases you can read about at IMBRA.ORG.

IMBRA2005: Please admit to everyone here what organization you work for. Is it the TJC or not? Is your salary paid by donations from people who want to help "protect foreign women from abuse"? Disclosure please.

Also, please answer: did the Ohio Plaintiffs quit? I HOPE SO!! Because their case was weakened by having a female lawyer who won't argue the "intentions" of IMBRA like the male Georgia lawyer did. Also: the Ohio Plaintiffs consist of websites with modern Email technology that could, if demanded, comply with IMBRA. So the judge told them that their business would not be affected and "Americans have no fundamental liberty interest in meeting foreigners for relationships".

Also the Ohio Plaintiff, Mark S, seemed like a clueless metrosexual who told an Ohio newspaper "I think the law is well intentioned but I don't see why I have to tell a foreigner about my former marriages and number of children". He cluelessly upheld IMBRA with that statement. You don't strike down a bad law by saying it was "well-intentioned".

The Georgia case is what counts and we may disagree about the restraining order there on whether it covers the Visa process.

But it has kept all the good international dating websites in business.

There is no big "mail order bride" website that is either out of business or really complying with IMBRA. Even when a site says it complies, it of course does no such thing.

The Georgia TRO is keeping these sites in business and in non-compliance with IMBRA.

Soon, this summer, there will be more lawsuits dealing more specifically with the visa process. Plus, the TJC will not be spared lawsuits for fraud (making money from "donations" while holding up everyone's visas).

Nobody here will be spared delays because of IMBRA as long as the users of so-called "Marriage Brokers" are persecuted. It is as simple as that.

You are caught in the battle between the TJC and the kind of American man who actually has a pair.

[ScottishHighlands 0]

For those of you who are still on the fence, please read the Georgia judge's restraining order against IMBRA:

http://www.imbra.org/images/TROJudge_sFinalOrder.pdf

Among other things, the judge says that the exclusion of Match.com and Yahoo Personals was a violation of the Constitution. If you are going to regulate Americans and foreigners meeting each other, you have to regulate Match.com and Yahoo. Arguments that these websites are more "feminist" friendly...are meaningless. They introduce total strangers to each other and one of those strangers could be dangerous. If you are going to violate everyone's rights because someone might be dangerous, then you have to step on the toes of major corporations like Match and Yahoo who can afford armies of lawyers and get politicians voted out of office.

There is a lawsuit against MySpace.com now. A girl's mother is suing the News Corp subsidiary (of which Fox News belongs) because she feels that the site should be verifying how old everyone is who uses Internet chat sites.

This means that users of VisaJourney.com should have provided proof of who they are and how old they are exactly in order to speak.

This wonderful lawsuit against MySpace.com will help get everyone's rights defined.

While the TJC and European Connections fight themselves to the Supreme Court over IMBRA...many other lawsuits will be fought with companies like MySpace and Yahoo forced to defend themselves with armies of lawyers.

The decisions made in the other lawsuits will directly affect how the Supreme Court finally decides over IMBRA.

I suspect that the MySpace.com lawsuit will end in favor of MySpace.com and the public's right not to have to prove their ages (and therefore their identities) in order to talk online.

Those decisions will be used to defeat IMBRA for the same thing: male users of international dating sites should not have to identify themselves at any point in the process, except on the visa form and then without having to say they used an international dating site.

Notice that IMBRA2005 isn't even trying to pretend that she has a foreign significant other. She is a lobbyist. Her income comes from playing up this issue and getting donations.

Edited June 29, 2006 by ScottishHighlands

[Imbra2005 0]

oh, brother....

I am getting that deja vu feeling here....a troll wearing a sock puppet.

[Dean iWait 0]

Hi everyone,

I know I've been beating this site up with criminal history questions that no one really has an answer to yet, but here is another one. On the I-129F instructions for filling the form it states to include all court and police records showing charges and disposition. On the acctual application it just asks you to attach a separate piece of paper with information relating to the crime involved, date of conviction, and sentence.

I went to all the court houses and got certified copies of the records. The records show the Case history, including all charges, dispositions, dates, and sentences. Plus I'm going to attach a separate piece of paper explaining it all. Plus I will send any copies of original charging papers and whatever else I can dig up.

My charges all stemmed from Part C: question #3: alcohol related

Do you think this should be enough for the USCIS?

I have the same exact situation. I talked to an immigration attorney yesterday, he advised that in additon to the court records that I also provide a certified copy of my police record. You should be able to get that through your State Police or at least they should be able to point you in the right direction. Sorry your thread got hijacked by these trolls.

[shimmy 0]

So the racist law says that a website with more than 50% foreigners is an IMB.

I was wondering if you would cite the source of this information as I have read the exceptions but have not run across the 50% rule. Thanks.

[vartan 0]

Man the question was asked what people thought was enough information for alcohol related issues then ScottishHighlands and IMBRA2005 start rambling on about off topic stuf.. when will they leave!!

[Ladylethal 12]

Andy, I'd just provide all they ask for, the more the better in these situations, so you don't get another RFE for further information.