Michael Savage banned from entry into the UK

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Savage is a bit of a nutjob but he doesn't advocate violence or represent extremist groups.

Its not against the law to be loud mouthed.

This is a peculiar decision indeed.

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

Neither does Louis Farrakhan

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Obviously that isn't the criteria the home office uses.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

damn...if only the Native Americans would have banned colonists from entry.

[rebeccajo 14]

Savage is a bit of a nutjob but he doesn't advocate violence or represent extremist groups.

Its not against the law to be loud mouthed.

This is a peculiar decision indeed.

It is.

But it's funny nonetheless.

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

Clever mate, thumbs up to England

But people like that don't travel outside the country, that's the main reason why they are full of ignorance, everything they know is Ameeeerica Ameeeerica maybe he doesn't even have a passport

Haha. You haven't a clue. He's been all over the world.

Have you even left North America?

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Clever mate, thumbs up to England

But people like that don't travel outside the country, that's the main reason why they are full of ignorance, everything they know is Ameeeerica Ameeeerica maybe he doesn't even have a passport

Haha. You haven't a clue. He's been all over the world.

Have you even left North America?

I don't know... let me think.... Tavo has lived in Mexico, the US and Europe. Does that count?

OWNED.

[meowmeowmeow 1]

hahahaha...mike savage blows, so who cares.

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

Clever mate, thumbs up to England

But people like that don't travel outside the country, that's the main reason why they are full of ignorance, everything they know is Ameeeerica Ameeeerica maybe he doesn't even have a passport

Haha. You haven't a clue. He's been all over the world.

Have you even left North America?

I don't know... let me think.... Tavo has lived in Mexico, the US and Europe. Does that count?

OWNED.

Yet Tavo stereotypes Michael Savage. ZOMG

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

The truth is that Savage speaks out against the oh-so angry arm of an un-named religion. Britain likes to appease this religion. So they don't want Savage around to upset their apple cart.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Freedom of speech always includes the right not to listen. Evidently, the U.K. is just exercising that part of the Freedom.

[meowmeowmeow 1]

The truth is that Savage speaks out against the oh-so angry arm of an un-named religion. Britain likes to appease this religion. So they don't want Savage around to upset their apple cart.

people like him fail to realize that religion is not the driving point behind these so called "religious movements". there are plenty of people who share this "un-named religion" worldwide who don't appreciate what these people do. try not to be so bigoted please.

michael savage is a douchebag, and as for the UK appeasing this "un-named religion" that is a joke. if anything, it's the opposite.

[Ban Hammer 13,678]

damn...if only the Native Americans would have banned colonists from entry.

yeah, but they were being nice and look what happened to them.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

The irony here is that out of all the people I have spoken to in the world, Brits are the most outspoken about the US.

Don't count out the folks from Down Under. Both countries tend to churn out experts on how America should be run- especially if they've never been to the U.S. before. They shout the loudest of all.

...of which BooYah, aka Constellation, is the official representative to VJ!

An aside: freedom of speech applies to those resident in a country, and freedom of entry is intrinsic only for citizens of a country. Last-I-checked, UK is entirely different country than US and Savage has US-passport-only.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The truth is that Savage speaks out against the oh-so angry arm of an un-named religion. Britain likes to appease this religion. So they don't want Savage around to upset their apple cart.

Or it could be simply that the Home Secretary enjoys a broader spectrum of powers than the position merits and that her views don't necessarily reflect the views of the British public. Just a suggestion.