Separate AR/AP section from Waiver

[anitacastillo 0]

I don't think the waiver needy people - applicants who have already broken some rule and need a waiver - should be included in the same VJ section with those innocent applicants caught up in name check or relationship verification.

This probably won't happen - but I wanted to put it out there.

[Sinergy 3]

Well thats kinda rude....and try to remember that "waiver needy people" are not just for people who as you say "have already broken some rule and need a waiver" I think you need to do your research before you start a thread about something like this, and post so very judgmentally.

[TBoneTX 45,288]

I perceived (and still perceive) the OP's language to include anyone who has broken a rule inadvertently or perhaps as a result of bad advice. (How many VJ members are shocked to learn, as a result of the information on VJ, that they're in a real pickle?) I perceive the use of "innocent" to refer to those who are caught up in circumstances that are purely out of personal control, such as those that the OP suggests. Regardless, I believe that the OP's idea is worthy of further exploration and dispassionate evaluation.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I tend to agree with TBone on this one -- I read it similarly and also think it would be useful to have a separate sub-forum somewhere. The waivers and AR/AP processes can be very different, and I don't really see the overlap that would explain the lumping together. Of course I know there are more than a few on VJ who object to yet more sub-fora, but those are my 2 cents.