Pat Buchanan on Obama in Latin America: "The most shameful and pathetic performance by an American leader at a summit in my lifetime"

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/30314187#30314187

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

I still got some Buchanan for President yard signs around here somewhere. They are real popular with the Aussies.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I am scouring Free Republic to see what the freaks have to say about this.

Here's an image posted there, in response to this.

[Danno 1,228]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

Edited April 21, 2009 by Danno

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

Forgive me, not a big fan of Pat no matter what is coming out of his azz. Telling the rest of the world to kiss his Bushy Azz clearly failed to work out, give Obama a chance. If not, find a candidate who can win in four years.

[sj5 4]

Edited April 21, 2009 by sj5

[Danno 1,228]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

Forgive me, not a big fan of Pat no matter what is coming out of his azz. Telling the rest of the world to kiss his Bushy Azz clearly failed to work out, give Obama a chance. If not, find a candidate who can win in four years.

One need not be a fan to see the comparison was off.

Ps: "Give Obama a Chance"... we keep hearing that talking-point over and over.

exactly when is it we can make comment? ( tell me, I really will make it on my calendar)

[ready4ONE 5,400]

Rush may be a bigger douche, but a douche is a douche, thus the comparison stands in my opinion.

Given the eight years leading up to the vast array of crisis which the W era has inflicted on both this country and the world, it is pathetic to see all of the blame heaped upon Obama, and every effort made to declare everything he does a disaster which will ruin us forever as a nation. Bush was the king of putzes and America survived, rest assured we will survive Obama too. And since we are just a few months into his first term, I for one am willing to still hope we end up thriving.

Edited April 21, 2009 by ready4ONE

[Tahoma 2,292]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

How did you come to the conclusion that President Obama "bombed so badly?" Because Pat Buchanan said so?

Pat Buchanan could not even come up with one single point from President Ortega's speech that was not true.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

How did you come to the conclusion that President Obama "bombed so badly?" Because Pat Buchanan said so?

Pat Buchanan could not even come up with one single point from President Ortega's speech that was not true.

So, you think Danny Ortega was completely accurate in his 50 minute presentation?

[Danno 1,228]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

How did you come to the conclusion that President Obama "bombed so badly?" Because Pat Buchanan said so?

Pat Buchanan could not even come up with one single point from President Ortega's speech that was not true.

So, you think Danny Ortega was completely accurate in his 50 minute presentation?

Of course he does. In fact he and Ortega have one thing in common, they both agree America "could be" a good country... someday.

[Danno 1,228]

Rush may be a bigger douche, but a douche is a douche, thus the comparison stands in my opinion.

Given the eight years leading up to the vast array of crisis which the W era has inflicted on both this country and the world, it is pathetic to see all of the blame heaped upon Obama, and every effort made to declare everything he does a disaster which will ruin us forever as a nation. Bush was the king of putzes and America survived, rest assured we will survive Obama too. And since we are just a few months into his first term, I for one am willing to still hope we end up thriving.

Yeah we got all that,

... but you never told me "when" the Obama Grace period is up? How long must we remain silent?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

How did you come to the conclusion that President Obama "bombed so badly?" Because Pat Buchanan said so?

Pat Buchanan could not even come up with one single point from President Ortega's speech that was not true.

So, you think Danny Ortega was completely accurate in his 50 minute presentation?

Of course he does. In fact he and Ortega have one thing in common, they both agree America "could be" a good country... someday.

Like it was under Bush?

[Danno 1,228]

Pat has all the credibility of Rush Limbaugh in a package about 25 lbs lighter...

Forgive me for saying it but, you are talking out of your azz.

I enjoy Rush but to compare these two is a display of ignorance.

While Rush is the ultimate un-spin master,.... undoing spin and re-spinning it.

Pat Buchanan is a very principled writer who has never followed a party line or worked to further anything but his own principles. As an example, He was against the Iraq war long before most on the left were.

He has often give Obama thumbs=up when it's deserved. In this case, Obama bombed so badly, my concerns about him are now spreading to areas, I once had confidence in.

Can anyone Image JFK doing something like this?

How did you come to the conclusion that President Obama "bombed so badly?" Because Pat Buchanan said so?

Pat Buchanan could not even come up with one single point from President Ortega's speech that was not true.

So, you think Danny Ortega was completely accurate in his 50 minute presentation?

Of course he does. In fact he and Ortega have one thing in common, they both agree America "could be" a good country... someday.

Like it was under Bush?

Our Country has always been GOOD. If you think the resident of the White House determines if our country is good or not, well thats' a sad commentary on your outlook.