Jump to content

194 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

Ole Perez was so full of himself as he asked the question, I mean here was another great opportunity to toot the Gay theme about **-marriage....... only problem was, her answer was not what he expected. :whistle:

He looked so broken in the split screen shot, head dropped down as the crowd seemed to Cheer (for the most part) her answer.

Listen to the tape, even in a silly Azz Beauty contest, the "will of the people can be heard" in their response as she answered the question.

type2homophobia_zpsf8eddc83.jpg




"Those people who will not be governed by God


will be ruled by tyrants."



William Penn

  • Replies 193
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
If the judges can't judge her answers, then who is being politically correct?

You gotta be kidding me.

He isn't.

And just who would be p!ssing a stream about being PC if the below situation had happened and people complained? Political Correctness is a two-sided street that you seem walk on only one side of it.

I'm sure everyone would be OUTRAGED about PC gone wild if Ted Nugent had been a judge, he asked Miss California what she thought about assault rifles, she said she thought they should be banned and then she lost.

Who?? Like every news caster on every channel other than Fox News. But this issue isn't done. We are only just now hearing about it (on Fox). When the conservative masses hear this- just coming off their Tea Parties- their heals are going to be dug in even deaper than they were before. Perez's actions hurt his own cause worse than anything. He just knocked a lot of people who didn't really have strong opinions about this issue off the fence and into the "hate" yard as you like to refer to it, because while people may not actually "hate" gays, most "hate" to be told how they are supposed to think. They might now huddle in large masses like the left wing protesters. They do it in more affective means- like at the polls.

I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

you go both ways and agree that she should have answered in support of gay marriage? :unsure:

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

Filed: Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

so .. she was a victim of discrimination. her answer was not PC. Hope she sues and wins big.

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

so .. she was a victim of discrimination. her answer was not PC. Hope she sues and wins big.

:lol: Oh the irony.

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

so .. she was a victim of discrimination. her answer was not PC. Hope she sues and wins big.

Dude, they judge women on their "inner" and "outer" beauty. Of course she was discriminated against.

Filed: Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

so .. she was a victim of discrimination. her answer was not PC. Hope she sues and wins big.

Dude, they judge women on their "inner" and "outer" beauty. Of course she was discriminated against.

her beauty was based on her beliefs. Inner/outer had nothing to do with this...

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

so .. she was a victim of discrimination. her answer was not PC. Hope she sues and wins big.

Dude, they judge women on their "inner" and "outer" beauty. Of course she was discriminated against.

Isn't it ironic, doncha think? A little tooooo ironic....

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
I agree with that. This schmuck Perez was being an #######. But I don't agree with the premise that this is an issue of political correctness, because it goes both ways - if the contestant should be allowed to be honest, the judge should be able to judge her answer. The criteria over how the judges rank these girls is irrelevant. As if a contest that judges beauty is politcally correct in of itself. The whole thing is a spectacle of NPC.

She was penalized for expressing a politically unacceptable viewpoint, which is the essense of PC.

Yes, but in the context of a contest for which she is judged by those answers. To take the position that the pageant shouldn't be allowed to ask politically charged questions or that they shouldn't be able to judge the answers is also being PC. Do you see what I mean?

so .. she was a victim of discrimination. her answer was not PC. Hope she sues and wins big.

Dude, they judge women on their "inner" and "outer" beauty. Of course she was discriminated against.

her beauty was based on her beliefs. Inner/outer had nothing to do with this...

Of course it does. How else are the judges going to decide who wins?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...