Tea Parties

[mRx 16]

I watched closely all the tea parties all over the country Wednesday. What a showing of national pride and solidarity. What a showing of subservient compliance and casual indifference. What a joke.

In Lafayette Park, Washington D.C., of all places to protest, the plan was to dump one million tea bags in the park, but the brave dissidents never did it because they forgot to get the proper permits. Are you kidding me? What is civil disobedience without civil disobedience? They even went so far as to say that they were willing to put down plastic tarps and clean up after themselves.

That’s like saying we don’t agree with your oppressive, unconstitutional despotism of our nation and to show our ire in no uncertain terms we’re going to break public law and disrupt the peace so take that, nah- nah-ne-boo-boo. But don’t worry because we’ll put everything back when we’re done as if nothing happened cuz we don’t want any trouble!

Videos on the Internet of Lafayette Park show people standing around in their trendy turtlenecks and Tommy Hilfiger and North Face jackets, chatting, socializing, drinking coffee and talking on their cell phones. Some dressed in colonial garb (how cute) and waving flags. Others even break into a rendition of the Star Spangled Banner followed by a chant of "USA, USA, USA." What a terrific show of meaningless symbolism.

Who are they chanting to? The buildings in front of them? The birds in the trees? Themselves? What was this supposed to do, because it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to surmise that it did NOTHING! All the politicians were inside, smugly and comfortably seated in their expensive leather chairs that we paid for. They were discussing their next round of special interest pandering and deficit spending at our expense while we mingled as if at a, well, tea party. But not the sort of 1773 but rather more like the sort at 4 p.m. in England that is served with crumpets.

The politicians could have cared less about the goings on outside and NO ONE took it to them. Shame on us. No one made sure they took notice. No one was put out one bit. No economic loss to the government whatsoever, as was the purpose of the original tea party, so why should they notice?

Is this like giving to a charity? You write a check to feed a starving child for 10 cents a day in some far off, nameless, faceless country and you feel better about yourself?

I attended a "tea party" in the Midwest on Wednesday and there were only about 200 people there. And it was literally a tea party: people came with their coffee mugs and sandwiches, holding signs and standing around and chatting and socializing and then everyone went home. No passion. No signs of real frustration or discontent. No real commitment to changing anything. You know why? Because nobody wants to fire the first shot! Everybody wants change, but only if they don’t have to pay for it. Only if their comfortable lives don’t have to be disrupted for their freedom. What a bunch of #######.

Then I see all these political pundits ( idiots ) on CNN talking about how the tea party movement is nothing more than a partisan, Republican, conservative movement against the Obama administration and how the majority of Americans agree with the taxing and borrowing and spending. Some numb-nuts CNN political (#######)yst named Jeff Toobin says that the Texas state legislative resolution to reaffirm their state’s sovereignty is a fantasy. Are you kidding me? State’s sovereignty is a fantasy? Well I guess that says it all. Come on everyone, down the rabbit hole.

One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small…

Welcome to the other side of the looking glass everybody. My name’s Alice and I’ll be your host for the mad tea party today. Let me introduce some other guests: the Hatter, March Hare, Dormouse, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Ted Kennedy, John McCain, Rod Blagojevich, Al Sharpton, Hillary Clinton all the AIG executives and many, many more. Don’t worry you’ll have time to get to know them all since you can’t leave no matter what you do so might as well just get used to it. Resistance is futile.

No doubt the majority of Americans didn’t want to go to war against the British in 1776. But would anyone say now that it was the wrong thing to do? No doubt the majority of Americans didn’t want a civil war. Both those wars were, at their core, about state’s rights. About oppressive governments trying to overreach their authority and impose unlawful mandates on the states. It was about their freedom to do what they wish with their lives.

I think we have met the enemy and it is us. We’re a bunch of fast food nourished, MTV anesthetized, shopping mall, plug-in-drug (aka television) addicts who will do anything to preserve that way of life at least until we die. After that who cares?

We’re a clinically obese, socially disconnected, politically inept and intellectually bankrupt nation of douche bags who deserve everything they get.

The movement has no leader. When I listen to anyone other than Ron Paul, Peter Schiff or Lew Rockwell speak about the issues we discuss on LRC I might as well be listening to any other political party spokesperson. They sound just the same. They dress just the same. They say the same old tired things. Ron Paul has even mentioned at times that the Libertarian party has become just another political party interested more in their political posturing rather than liberty. They have all the same sorts of infighting and power struggles that are symptomatic of the fact that they have lost their way.

Rallying the troops to vote more like-minded individuals into office won’t work. That’s an old, failing strategy. When will someone step forward with the courage, character, wisdom and intelligence to lead our nation into the 21st century the way our forefathers led it into the 19th century?

Will it be Texas governor Rick Perry? Perry is using rhetoric about seceding from the union. That is EXACTLY the kind of thing we need. I believe, given the other states with similar resolutions in their legislatures, that it would begin a domino effect. It would give people a chance to actually have a clear reason to fight: their state’s rights of sovereignty and they would know that they have the state’s resources behind them. Unfortunately, even though it’s clear what a boost Texas seceding would be in uniting us, I have no doubt that Perry is not up to the task and is using the issue as nothing more than a rallying point for reelection.

Where have all the heroes gone? Where are all the pioneers? Where are the visionaries? Where are the true statesmen? Where are the defenders of freedom? What has happened to the American Spirit of life and liberty? I guess they’re all at the mall or Starbucks and are too fat to get up out of their chair and fight. Or they’re looking forward to retirement and the "good life" after spending their life being a good soldier and playing by the rules and saving for the "golden years" while their real golden years of youth were passing them by. Certainly they can’t be asked to risk all that for something as silly as their children’s futures. How selfish of me.

Or maybe we don’t want to risk our children’s well-being now, so we defer it until they’re adults and let them deal with the fact that they can’t afford college or health care or a home without going into enormous debt and we never teach them the importance of things like: character, honor, integrity, truth and freedom but rather teach them how to live in fear and how important it is to get a "good job" and play by the rules and to go along to get along and that will be safe.

We’re pathetic.

April 18, 2009

Don Cooper [send him mail] is a Florida native, Navy veteran and Oxford educated economist living and working in the Midwest.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

... nobody wants to fire the first shot! Everybody wants change, but only if they don’t have to pay for it.

Apparently, neither does the author.... he didn't fire the first shot either, did he?

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Change = trillions in debt? Keep the change!

[c_and_a 0]

Nice article.

[fozzie 41]

Change = trillions in debt? Keep the change!

Is that the 2 trillion that bush added to the national debt after inheriting a surplus?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Change = trillions in debt? Keep the change!

Is that the 2 trillion that bush added to the national debt after inheriting a surplus?

Debt and deficit are not the same.

A deficit or surplus in any given year is nothing more than a delta in the larger national debt.

Bill Clinton left office with a budget surplus, but at no point during his Presidency did this country not have debt.

[SuperDuper! 230]

I guess it will take $12 dollar gasoline to get americanz to march in the streets and mean it.

[fozzie 41]

Change = trillions in debt? Keep the change!

Is that the 2 trillion that bush added to the national debt after inheriting a surplus?

Debt and deficit are not the same.

A deficit or surplus in any given year is nothing more than a delta in the larger national debt.

Bill Clinton left office with a budget surplus, but at no point during his Presidency did this country not have debt.

I stand corrected.

You are right of course. Bush actually added $4tn to the national debt, the largest by any president in US history.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/29/co...ry4486228.shtml

[mawilson 2,133]

You are right of course. Bush actually added $4tn to the national debt, the largest by any president in US history.

Second only to Obama.

[GaryC 7]

You are right of course. Bush actually added $4tn to the national debt, the largest by any president in US history.

Second only to Obama.

And Obama did it in only 3 months! He's good!

[mRx 16]

Conservatives are just as guilty for our economic condition as the Liberals are.

The constant Red vs. Blue diatribe is obsolescent; both parties are garbage, and are merely two sides of the same coin. I think that as this becomes evident, the two parties will meet in the middle; not as moderates, but Populists.

[GaryC 7]

Conservatives are just as guilty for our economic condition as the Liberals are.

The constant Red vs. Blue diatribe is obsolescent; both parties are garbage, and are merely two sides of the same coin. I think that as this becomes evident, the two parties will meet in the middle; not as moderates, but Populists.

I agree that reps and dems are two sides of the same coin. They are both chopf#cks. But when they meet in the middle all we will get is twice the garbage. We need a third, fourth and maybe a fifth party.

[Ban Hammer 13,644]

We need a third, fourth and maybe a fifth party.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Conservatives are just as guilty for our economic condition as the Liberals are.

The constant Red vs. Blue diatribe is obsolescent; both parties are garbage, and are merely two sides of the same coin. I think that as this becomes evident, the two parties will meet in the middle; not as moderates, but Populists.

I agree that reps and dems are two sides of the same coin. They are both chopf#cks. But when they meet in the middle all we will get is twice the garbage. We need a third, fourth and maybe a fifth party.

How about a Kegger Party?

[GaryC 7]

Conservatives are just as guilty for our economic condition as the Liberals are.

The constant Red vs. Blue diatribe is obsolescent; both parties are garbage, and are merely two sides of the same coin. I think that as this becomes evident, the two parties will meet in the middle; not as moderates, but Populists.

I agree that reps and dems are two sides of the same coin. They are both chopf#cks. But when they meet in the middle all we will get is twice the garbage. We need a third, fourth and maybe a fifth party.

How about a Kegger Party?

I could go for that. As a matter of fact I think I will get myself a beer.