Fiancee visa help....!!!

[ranran 0]

Well, Daisy...

Here is another suggestion... why not get married first and convert your K1 to CR1 (I think it is the spouse application)... It will be a little bit longer on the waiting list, but for sure by doing this you will have a better chance... (correct me if I am wrong, guys)....

[john_and_marlene 162]

Well, Daisy...

Here is another suggestion... why not get married first and convert your K1 to CR1 (I think it is the spouse application)... It will be a little bit longer on the waiting list, but for sure by doing this you will have a better chance... (correct me if I am wrong, guys)....

How does this improve her chances with the waiver? It will still be needed.

[desert_fox 32]

She is inadmissible....no matter what visa class.

The Consulate does not have any options, as it is required by law. A waiver is authorized for the inadmissibility.

[ranran 0]

Totally agree with a waiver, Daisy must need it, but a spouse visa is a much better chance compare to a finacee visa, don't you guys think so...???

[john_and_marlene 162]

Totally agree with a waiver, Daisy must need it, but a spouse visa is a much better chance compare to a finacee visa, don't you guys think so...???

I have no information that would lead me to think that. What do you base your claim on?

[ranran 0]

don't get me wrong, a waiver still needed. But a spouse visa is more concrete comparing to a finacee visa as long as the marriage is true and the evidences can prove that, finacee visa only for intended to marry (from the INS point of view).

[desert_fox 32]

Totally agree with a waiver, Daisy must need it, but a spouse visa is a much better chance compare to a finacee visa, don't you guys think so...???

I think it would have a positive effect in getting a waiver approved...after the visa is denied. So would having 3 kids.

The fact that her fiance has a business in the US, that he cannot leave is the only thing Ive seen so far that makes a waiver approveable.

Edited June 30, 2006 by desert_fox

[Yodrak 7]

ranran,

A fine collection of words, but the statement carries no meaning.

Yodrak

... But a spouse visa is more concrete comparing to a finacee visa as long as the marriage is true and the evidences can prove that, finacee visa only for intended to marry (from the INS point of view).

[ranran 0]

ranran,

A fine collection of words, but the statement carries no meaning.

Yodrak

... But a spouse visa is more concrete comparing to a finacee visa as long as the marriage is true and the evidences can prove that, finacee visa only for intended to marry (from the INS point of view).

What I meant to say is that Daisy and her fiance's age gape and her illegal over stay are the red flags for immigration office to deny her visa. In order to build a stronger case for Daisy, marriage might be an alternative direction to get her waiver and approval of her visa. Instead of a K1 visa is only for intended to marry purposes which INS will care if Daisy might do the same as before.

[john_and_marlene 162]

ranran,

A fine collection of words, but the statement carries no meaning.

Yodrak

... But a spouse visa is more concrete comparing to a finacee visa as long as the marriage is true and the evidences can prove that, finacee visa only for intended to marry (from the INS point of view).

What I meant to say is that Daisy and her fiance's age gape and her illegal over stay are the red flags for immigration office to deny her visa. In order to build a stronger case for Daisy, marriage might be an alternative direction to get her waiver and approval of her visa. Instead of a K1 visa is only for intended to marry purposes which INS will care if Daisy might do the same as before.

Deleted

Edited June 30, 2006 by john_and_marlene

[desert_fox 32]

ranran,

A fine collection of words, but the statement carries no meaning.

Yodrak

... But a spouse visa is more concrete comparing to a finacee visa as long as the marriage is true and the evidences can prove that, finacee visa only for intended to marry (from the INS point of view).

What I meant to say is that Daisy and her fiance's age gape and her illegal over stay are the red flags for immigration office to deny her visa. In order to build a stronger case for Daisy, marriage might be an alternative direction to get her waiver and approval of her visa. Instead of a K1 visa is only for intended to marry purposes which INS will care if Daisy might do the same as before.

getting a visa approved, and getting a waiver approved are two different issues. The Consulate does not approve waivers.

You seem to be mixing the two together...but they are separate processes and go to different agencies.

[Yodrak 7]

ranran,

The relationship issue deals with whether or not it (the relationship) is for the purpose of evading immigration law to gain entry to the USA. If there is doubt as to the validity of the relationship it makes no difference whether the relationship is at the pre- or post-marriage stage. The act of marriage does not overcome the doubt.

Yodrak

ranran,

A fine collection of words, but the statement carries no meaning.

Yodrak

... But a spouse visa is more concrete comparing to a finacee visa as long as the marriage is true and the evidences can prove that, finacee visa only for intended to marry (from the INS point of view).

What I meant to say is that Daisy and her fiance's age gape and her illegal over stay are the red flags for immigration office to deny her visa. In order to build a stronger case for Daisy, marriage might be an alternative direction to get her waiver and approval of her visa. Instead of a K1 visa is only for intended to marry purposes which INS will care if Daisy might do the same as before.

[ranran 0]

getting a visa approved, and getting a waiver approved are two different issues. The Consulate does not approve waivers.

Yes, you guys are right. My suggestion is only for Daisy to imporve her chances of getting that waiver because of her marriage (marriage does show to the INS that their relationship is real, I mean as long as they are real) and that will also help her down the road if she is able to get that waiver approve. (Again, correct me if I am wrong and thank you all for the corrections)

[john_and_marlene 162]

getting a visa approved, and getting a waiver approved are two different issues. The Consulate does not approve waivers.

Yes, you guys are right. My suggestion is only for Daisy to imporve her chances of getting that waiver because of her marriage (marriage does show to the INS that their relationship is real, I mean as long as they are real) and that will also help her down the road if she is able to get that waiver approve. (Again, correct me if I am wrong and thank you all for the corrections)

You are wrong. Please give up.

[kitkat1 5]

Totally agree with a waiver, Daisy must need it, but a spouse visa is a much better chance compare to a finacee visa, don't you guys think so...???

Her visa WILL be denied based on her overstay and she is facing a 10 year ban.

According to the law, fiances are eligible to apply for waivers so it makes no difference if they are married or just engaged. When it comes to her fiance's ability to prove extreme hardship to HIM if he had to move to her country if her visa were denied, whether or not they are married doesn't play much of a part.

If we knew Daisy's location, we could tell her about the approval rates and timing there.