What if you sent your application to CSC rather than VSC

[Immigrant2009 0]

Hello Folks,

Hope you all are doing well and ready for Easter. I have two theories/questions.

1- I was wondering like all my other VJers who sent their I-751 to VSC and are stuck what if a person sends to CSC rather than VSC. Will they get declined or

will their application be rejected.

Man rather move to place or have a mailing address which comes under CSC than VSC, i wish i had applied to CSC. Also of Jan, Feb 2009 are getting approved in CSC .

2- Did VSC send June till October 2008 or June Till September 2008.

VSC seems to not approving much of May 2008 cases, i guess due to H1 B season, so in May will VSC start processing October 2008 or September 2008. I hope at the end of this month, they update processing time of I-751 to May 20 2008.

What do you say. Your input will be appreciated.

Thanks and have a wonderful weekend.

[poochie 0]

Hello Folks,

Hope you all are doing well and ready for Easter. I have two theories/questions.

1- what if a person sends to CSC rather than VSC. Will they get declined or

will their application be rejected.

Thanks and have a wonderful weekend.

I'm not sure how to answer the second question, sorry.

As for #1, the application submitted will be forwarded to the correct service center, which seems logical. I am not sure for others but my husband's former co-worker mistakenly mailed his I-751 application to CSC, his home address is under VSC's jurisdiction and his application was forwarded to VSC. The unfortunate thing is that it caused further delay.

Edited April 10, 2009 by poochie

[bdsmusa 2]

Ok so i just heard on Latino tv, that H1 usually fills up within 2 days about 65000 apps get approved, but this year because of the economy they havent received half that amount yet and its already been a week, they are blaming it on the economy and other factors, apperently less people want to come here "Legaly"lol, but then ####### is taking VSC so long????????

[Ree 9]

1- I was wondering like all my other VJers who sent their I-751 to VSC and are stuck what if a person sends to CSC rather than VSC. Will they get declined or

will their application be rejected.

The applications will be returned, you will receive it back with a notice "please send your application to the correct address".

[jasminelily 1]

2- Did VSC send June till October 2008 or June Till September 2008.

VSC seems to not approving much of May 2008 cases, i guess due to H1 B season, so in May will VSC start processing October 2008 or September 2008. I hope at the end of this month, they update processing time of I-751 to May 20 2008.

VSC pawned out June 08 - Oct 08 files to CSC. They will jump to Nov 08 from May 08.

[SuperDuper! 230]

It seems that the funny answer is: YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED TWICE AS FAST

[jasminelily 1]

It seems that the funny answer is: YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED TWICE AS FAST

I think that's a little understatement. CSC norm is 3 months, VSC norm is 12 months, so it's QUADRUPLE as fast.

[SuperDuper! 230]

It seems that the funny answer is: YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED TWICE AS FAST

I think that's a little understatement. CSC norm is 3 months, VSC norm is 12 months, so it's QUADRUPLE as fast.

Yes, understatement. We dont want to make VSC folks feel too bad

[jasminelily 1]

It seems that the funny answer is: YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED TWICE AS FAST

I think that's a little understatement. CSC norm is 3 months, VSC norm is 12 months, so it's QUADRUPLE as fast.

Yes, understatement. We dont want to make VSC folks feel too bad

ok, well... talking about the uneven speed between the two centers, kind of don't want to start this because I know lots of VJers are going to join in venting and sometimes I'm reading others stories are worse than me so I always feel bad. Anyways, I just simply think that the masterminds who caused the uneven number of cases distribution and behind this TSC to VSC, VSC to CSC switch are the ones who should feel bad. Feel bad is an understatement as well. *Remember what Iowa Senator Charles Grassley said to AIG?* They claimed on their website that there was a significant increase of applications on year 2007. So on year 2008 when they decided to narrow down the processing centers into two major ones (which we now know is VSC and CSC), WHAT THE HECK WERE THEY THINKING? They should have known better and had the statistics in hands about some states have more population/application/approved 2 yr GC in year 2007 than others, especially New Mexico and Texas. They weren't exactly dividing the states into East and West either. Why can't they use the statistics to evenly divide up the case loads between the two processing centers so the timeline for both centers can be equal/even, perhaps 6 months and 6 months instead of 3 months and 12 months.

Sigh! Anyone understand/get what I'm saying? Serious frustrations for folks at VSC, especially folks who got moved from first TSC then VSC then CSC. Let alone to talk about the chances of losing files when transferring. Other please feel free to express your opinions about what went wrong and how can they fix the uneven problem.

*Refer to this link if anyone who doesn't know about what Iowa Senator said to AIG:

http://wcbstv.com/national/grassley.AIG.su...e.2.960939.html

[jasminelily 1]

Talking about the uneven distribution, refer to this website for PERSONS OBTAINING LEGAL PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS BY STATE OF RESIDENCE: FISCAL YEARS 1998 TO 2007

http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statist...007/table04.xls

I painted a US map and colored the excel spread sheet (Couldn't attach them, files are too big), just to see what's the difference in population for LPR in comparison of VSC and CSC. It shows that the immigrant population for the states belong to VSC jurisdiction is much greater than CSC.

Total VSC Year 2007 609,071

Total CSC Year 2007 437,941

Although, the data doesn't represent specifically about the 2 yr conditional GC because I couldn't find them, but that should still tell you something about what I meant by uneven case loads. If someone can find that data, please post the website or let me know. I'm sure everyone under VSC jurisdiction here would like to show USCIS/DHS about how "no-brainer" is their method of dividing VSC/CSC jurisdiction. Anyone else please feel free to comment about the statistics. Also feel free to point out if I mis-colored any state, I did double check but it's kind of late and I'm a little tired after a long day of work.

Alabama 3,393

Arkansas 2,722

Connecticut 12,932

Delaware 2,085

District of Columbia 2,541

Florida 126,277

Georgia 27,353

Kentucky 4,340

Louisiana 3,475

Maine 1,488

Maryland 24,255

Massachusetts 30,555

Mississippi 1,593

New Hampshire 2,272

New Jersey 55,834

New Mexico 3,112

New York 136,739

North Carolina 15,469

Oklahoma 4,269

Pennsylvania 22,811

Rhode Island 3,354

South Carolina 4,788

Tennessee 8,942

Texas 77,278

Vermont 791

Virginia 29,682

West Virginia 721

Total VSC Year 2007 609,071

Alaska 1,617

Arizona 17,528

California 228,941

Colorado 11,039

Hawaii 7,236

Idaho 2,044

Illinois 41,971

Indiana 6,639

Iowa 3,103

Kansas 4,141

Michigan 18,727

Minnesota 13,814

Missouri 6,459

Montana 575

Nebraska 3,066

Nevada 12,308

North Dakota 496

Ohio 14,078

Oregon 7,905

South Dakota 668

Utah 5,168

Washington 22,657

Wisconsin 7,381

Wyoming 380

Total CSC Year 2007 437,941

[jasminelily 1]

http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statist...007/table04.xls

Total: 609071+437941=1047012

Total VSC Year 2007 609,071 [609071/(609071+437941)=609071/1047012=58.17%]

Total CSC Year 2007 437,941 [437941/(609071+437941)=437941/1047012=41.83%]

609071-437941=171130 difference

58.17%-41.83%=16.34% difference

[Rigoletto 0]

It seems that the funny answer is: YOUR APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED TWICE AS FAST

I think that's a little understatement. CSC norm is 3 months, VSC norm is 12 months, so it's QUADRUPLE as fast.

Yes, understatement. We dont want to make VSC folks feel too bad

ok, well... talking about the uneven speed between the two centers, kind of don't want to start this because I know lots of VJers are going to join in venting and sometimes I'm reading others stories are worse than me so I always feel bad. Anyways, I just simply think that the masterminds who caused the uneven number of cases distribution and behind this TSC to VSC, VSC to CSC switch are the ones who should feel bad. Feel bad is an understatement as well. *Remember what Iowa Senator Charles Grassley said to AIG?* They claimed on their website that there was a significant increase of applications on year 2007. So on year 2008 when they decided to narrow down the processing centers into two major ones (which we now know is VSC and CSC), WHAT THE HECK WERE THEY THINKING? They should have known better and had the statistics in hands about some states have more population/application/approved 2 yr GC in year 2007 than others, especially New Mexico and Texas. They weren't exactly dividing the states into East and West either. Why can't they use the statistics to evenly divide up the case loads between the two processing centers so the timeline for both centers can be equal/even, perhaps 6 months and 6 months instead of 3 months and 12 months.

Sigh! Anyone understand/get what I'm saying? Serious frustrations for folks at VSC, especially folks who got moved from first TSC then VSC then CSC. Let alone to talk about the chances of losing files when transferring. Other please feel free to express your opinions about what went wrong and how can they fix the uneven problem.

*Refer to this link if anyone who doesn't know about what Iowa Senator said to AIG:

http://wcbstv.com/national/grassley.AIG.su...e.2.960939.html

Well, at least, for your increased fee and long wait at VSC, you now get a lovely message from the VSC director as

well as a special pouch to store your GC in. Your dollars at work!