CSC and VSC

[jasminelily 1]

I don't want to hijack others' thread so I'm starting a new topic here. Referring to the following thread:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=190547

I'm not sure how others feel, I think CSC is more practical on getting the job done, so I like it if they would just skip some steps (like e-mail update, approval NOA) and just get the 10 yr GC in people's hand asap. On the other hand, VSC is following procedure, totally by the book, sending out reminder before 90 days windown open, updating online and approval letter before the GC, etc etc. I feel that sometimes those every single step is causing a delay and another delay to get the GC to the people in need.

Sorry kind of hard to refrain from commenting. Anyone else got the same thought? Or you guys have different opinions? I'm welcome to logical civilized discussions. Well... logical and civilized... can't say that for our government agencies. Doesn't matter if they are 3 letters, 4 letters, or 5 letters.

(I can imagine Ant&D and AnytaHolland singing this children rhyme to their baby: One little two little three little teddy bears, four little five little six little teddy bears, seven little eight little nine little teddy bears, ten little teddy bears. )

[lavloze 0]

I don't want to hijack others' thread so I'm starting a new topic here. Referring to the following thread:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=190547

I'm not sure how others feel, I think CSC is more practical on getting the job done, so I like it if they would just skip some steps (like e-mail update, approval NOA) and just get the 10 yr GC in people's hand asap. On the other hand, VSC is following procedure, totally by the book, sending out reminder before 90 days windown open, updating online and approval letter before the GC, etc etc. I feel that sometimes those every single step is causing a delay and another delay to get the GC to the people in need.

Sorry kind of hard to refrain from commenting. Anyone else got the same thought? Or you guys have different opinions? I'm welcome to logical civilized discussions. Well... logical and civilized... can't say that for our government agencies. Doesn't matter if they are 3 letters, 4 letters, or 5 letters.

(I can imagine Ant&D and AnytaHolland singing this children rhyme to their baby: One little two little three little teddy bears, four little five little six little teddy bears, seven little eight little nine little teddy bears, ten little teddy bears. )

How about they just cancel the I-751 altogether. I think it's just a waste of money and time.

[Rigoletto 0]

Hi:

OK - I'll bite. The thing to keep in mind is that these notices that VSC send out "by the book" do not take up all

that much time. Most of these are automatically generated. So, other than saving stationary and paper (which is

good) and perhaps taking up more of the mailroom's time, sending or not sending these should not affect the

rate of adjudication significantly.

I sincerely doubt that VSC is that much slower because they are sending out more notices. They may have less

adjudication staff or they may receive a disproportionate share of cases, but I don't think the notices are

holding them up.

[Rigoletto 0]

I disagree. If you look at the number of divorces that occur within the two-year period and the number of waiver petitions filed,

there is a clearly a need for a second layer of review in order to prevent exploitation of the system. It is easy enough

for some people to get the documents together and pass an interview - it is harder to live together for two years if it is not

the real thing. Not that some fake marriages wouldn't pass the I751, but it decreases the statistical chances.

One good suggestion has been made to combine I751 layer of review with the 3-year citizenship process. Of course,

not everyone wants to apply for citizenship. Therefore, perhaps there could be the option of either (1) filing N400 for

citizenship or (2) filing the I751 on the 3rd-year anniversary.