Posting Content intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or prejudicial action against members of a protected group.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

<EOM>

[Nagishkaw 510]

I voted it's a TOS violation to muddle the tongues of one's enemies by uttering the word ' boink' .

[Nessa 23]

The argument that homosexuals do not deserve equal rights, including the right to marry. People have different views on homosexuality. Specially if you're religious, you'll not understand homosexuality. Saying that they don't deserve this or that is their opinion, therefore it doesn't violate TOS, people are entitled to their on opinions.

The argument that women must have a certain body type.

It's their preference. Most people have a certain body type preference, therefore it doesn't violate TOS.

The argument that blacks and hispanics are fairly targeted by police because they commit a disproportionate number of crimes.

It's based on facts. you're not attacking people when mentioning facts.

MY VOTE: The argument made that asian men have smaller genitalia and are thus inferior to other men.

THis is not based on facts. IT's like calling blondes dumb. It is said to attack asians.

The argument that gun owners as a group are culpable, each time a crime involving a gun occurs.

It's their opinion. It's like legalizing drugs, some people believe that it will increase consumption, and some people think it'll decrease crimes related to drug traffic.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Nessa, cool. You reasoned it through. I appreciate the input.

Saying that they don't deserve this or that is their opinion, therefore it doesn't violate TOS, people are entitled to their on opinions.

What if it's my opinion that Jews or blacks or indians are subhuman and therefore deserve to killed or enslaved?

Are all opinions protected solely because they're opinions?

Or can some opinions, when written out, be in violation of TOS?

[Chica Yeyé 41]

MY VOTE: The argument made that asian men have smaller genitalia and are thus inferior to other men.

THis is not based on facts. IT's like calling blondes dumb. It is said to attack asians.

But, but they are

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

MY VOTE: The argument made that asian men have smaller genitalia and are thus inferior to other men.

THis is not based on facts. IT's like calling blondes dumb. It is said to attack asians.

But, but they are

Len, is your post a violation of TOS?

[Nessa 23]

Nessa, cool. You reasoned it through. I appreciate the input.

Saying that they don't deserve this or that is their opinion, therefore it doesn't violate TOS, people are entitled to their on opinions.

What if it's my opinion that Jews or blacks or indians are subhuman and therefore deserve to killed or enslaved?

Are all opinions protected solely because they're opinions?

Or can some opinions, when written out, be in violation of TOS?

the part that they are subhumans would be a violation, you're degrading them. but not the part you think they should be killed or eslaved, that's the way you feel about them, people will jump on you, because that's a terrible way to think, but it's the way you feel it should be and you're sharing with people.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

MY VOTE: The argument made that asian men have smaller genitalia and are thus inferior to other men.

THis is not based on facts. IT's like calling blondes dumb. It is said to attack asians.

But, but they are

Len, is your post a violation of TOS?

I was not intending to degrade, intimidate or incite violence, so no

p.s. and blondes are not a protected group. maybe they should be though

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

If republicans are now the minority party, shouldn't they be given protected status as well?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

As with anything, there are gray areas.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

As with anything, there are gray areas.

Hence the blond dye jobs

[Ban Hammer 13,342]

i just blame aj.

[amberdima 6]

i chose the female body type option. stating a preference is one thing, but saying someone is inferior/ undesirable/ etc. because they don't possess this one idea of perfection is offensive and MANY posters say it just to start a bunch of ####### from angry, offended women

[Rocky_nBullwinkle 6]

I think it is a violations of the TOS to say. "STFU!"

[NatPatBen 3]

Interesting how evenly the responses are distributed.