Jump to content

331 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 330
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

That is SUCH an insightful and intelligent comment.

Obviously, Mags is a man and I'm a **.....

(and there's no apostrophe in "homos", cretin.)

I'm not bound to accept the view of the Supremes as my own. The Supremes also gave us Plessy v. Ferguson. The fact remains that if marriage is a right, you wouldn't need government to be married, but you do, so it isn't. Even after the Loving case, states still had anti-miscegnation laws on the books until 2000. If you want to get into court cases and how marriage laws evolved, I can do that. Legal and historical research is what I do most days.

Back up here - your original gripe was that you couldn't understand why non-gays would take issue with gay rights and I explained to you the logic. No matter how hard you try to paint this as some kind of liberal movement vs. a national awaking to the injustice of laws that discriminate based on someone's sexual orientation, the truth is in plain sight. In the tradition of the struggle for women's right to vote, for desegregation and to end laws against inter-racial marriages, we Americans fight fiercly for the very freedom and liberties our country was founded on. It's just too bad that can't see beyond your own subjectivity to see that this struggle for gay marriage is following a long tradition of justice for all.

See that brick wall over there? It has more intelligence and is more open to logic than VW.....

ie: don't bother.

Edited by PlatyPius
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. ####### coated bastards with ####### filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive bobble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine.
Filed: Other Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

That is SUCH an insightful and intelligent comment.

Obviously, Mags is a man and I'm a **.....

(and there's no apostrophe in "homos", cretin.)

I'm not bound to accept the view of the Supremes as my own. The Supremes also gave us Plessy v. Ferguson. The fact remains that if marriage is a right, you wouldn't need government to be married, but you do, so it isn't. Even after the Loving case, states still had anti-miscegnation laws on the books until 2000. If you want to get into court cases and how marriage laws evolved, I can do that. Legal and historical research is what I do most days.

Back up here - your original gripe was that you couldn't understand why non-gays would take issue with gay rights and I explained to you the logic. No matter how hard you try to paint this as some kind of liberal movement vs. a national awaking to the injustice of laws that discriminate based on someone's sexual orientation, the truth is in plain sight. In the tradition of the struggle for women's right to vote, for desegregation and to end laws against inter-racial marriages, we Americans fight fiercly for the very freedom and liberties our country was founded on. It's just too bad that can't see beyond your own subjectivity to see that this struggle for gay marriage is following a long tradition of justice for all.

See that brick wall over there? It has more intelligence and is more open to logic than VW.....

ie: don't bother.

That's the kind of response you offer when you run out of logic.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

you may be onto something there (no pun intended)

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128140

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

That is SUCH an insightful and intelligent comment.

Obviously, Mags is a man and I'm a **.....

(and there's no apostrophe in "homos", cretin.)

I'm not bound to accept the view of the Supremes as my own. The Supremes also gave us Plessy v. Ferguson. The fact remains that if marriage is a right, you wouldn't need government to be married, but you do, so it isn't. Even after the Loving case, states still had anti-miscegnation laws on the books until 2000. If you want to get into court cases and how marriage laws evolved, I can do that. Legal and historical research is what I do most days.

Back up here - your original gripe was that you couldn't understand why non-gays would take issue with gay rights and I explained to you the logic. No matter how hard you try to paint this as some kind of liberal movement vs. a national awaking to the injustice of laws that discriminate based on someone's sexual orientation, the truth is in plain sight. In the tradition of the struggle for women's right to vote, for desegregation and to end laws against inter-racial marriages, we Americans fight fiercly for the very freedom and liberties our country was founded on. It's just too bad that can't see beyond your own subjectivity to see that this struggle for gay marriage is following a long tradition of justice for all.

See that brick wall over there? It has more intelligence and is more open to logic than VW.....

ie: don't bother.

That's the kind of response you offer when you run out of logic.

No, that's the kind of response I give when I remember that logic is your kryptonite and that I'm just wasting my time. You will never answer a question. You will never give a valid reason for being.....you. I had plenty of logic. That's how I arrived at the POV that I have. You are the anti-logic, and after a while, my mind grows numb and I have to just walk away and forget you exist for a few weeks. But then I see an ad for Rush Limbaugh, and I'm reminded of your existence again....

Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. ####### coated bastards with ####### filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive bobble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine.
Filed: Other Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

you may be onto something there (no pun intended)

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128140

What if a gay illegal marries a gay citizen; would they be eligible for a waiver?

Maybe not, but they could get in state tuition in Maryland

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

you may be onto something there (no pun intended)

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128140

What if a gay illegal marries a gay citizen; would they be eligible for a waiver?

Maybe not, but they could get in state tuition in Maryland

and an aide position with barney frank

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

you may be onto something there (no pun intended)

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128140

What if a gay illegal marries a gay citizen; would they be eligible for a waiver?

Maybe not, but they could get in state tuition in Maryland

and an aide position with barney frank

MA was the first state to legalize same sex marriage, and Barney eats his corn the long way.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
I'm not bound to accept the view of the Supremes as my own. The Supremes also gave us Plessy v. Ferguson. The fact remains that if marriage is a right, you wouldn't need government to be married, but you do, so it isn't. Even after the Loving case, states still had anti-miscegnation laws on the books until 2000. If you want to get into court cases and how marriage laws evolved, I can do that. Legal and historical research is what I do most days.

Back up here - your original gripe was that you couldn't understand why non-gays would take issue with gay rights and I explained to you the logic. No matter how hard you try to paint this as some kind of liberal movement vs. a national awaking to the injustice of laws that discriminate based on someone's sexual orientation, the truth is in plain sight. In the tradition of the struggle for women's right to vote, for desegregation and to end laws against inter-racial marriages, we Americans fight fiercly for the very freedom and liberties our country was founded on. It's just too bad that can't see beyond your own subjectivity to see that this struggle for gay marriage is following a long tradition of justice for all.

It's a terrible injustice to grant rights on the basis of whom you like to **. In no way is this analygous to the strugge of women or racial minorites. As a woman and a racial minority, I strongly object to that comparison as manipulative and self-serving.

You think that because you still believe that being homosexual is a lifestyle choice. Its not. They are born that way so yes it is the same as racial discrimination (unless race is a choice too. Michael Jackson has grayed the issue somewhat).

K-1 Visa Journey

04/20/2006 - file our I-129f.

09/14/2006 - US Embassy interview. Ask Lauren to marry me again, just to make sure. Says Yes. Phew!

10/02/2006 - Fly to New York, EAD at JFK, I'm in!!

10/14/2006 - Married! The perfect wedding day.

AOS Journey

10/23/2006 - AOS and EAD filed

05/29/2007 - RFE (lost medical)

08/02/2007 - RFE received back at CSC

08/10/2007 - Card Production ordered

08/17/2007 - Green Card Arrives

Removing Conditions

05/08/2009 - I-751 Mailed

05/13/2009 - NOA1

06/12/2009 - Biometrics Appointment

09/24/2009 - Approved (twice)

10/10/2009 - Card Production Ordered

10/13/2009 - Card Production Ordered (Again?)

10/19/2009 - Green Card Received (Dated 10/13/19)

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

you may be onto something there (no pun intended)

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128140

What if a gay illegal marries a gay citizen; would they be eligible for a waiver?

Maybe not, but they could get in state tuition in Maryland

and an aide position with barney frank

MA was the first state to legalize same sex marriage, and Barney eats his corn the long way.

but what does he do with the cob?

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Only **'s support same sex marriage.

you may be onto something there (no pun intended)

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=128140

What if a gay illegal marries a gay citizen; would they be eligible for a waiver?

Maybe not, but they could get in state tuition in Maryland

and an aide position with barney frank

I can't find that position in the Kama Sutra. :blink:

Filed: Other Country: Israel
Timeline
Posted (edited)
I'm not bound to accept the view of the Supremes as my own. The Supremes also gave us Plessy v. Ferguson. The fact remains that if marriage is a right, you wouldn't need government to be married, but you do, so it isn't. Even after the Loving case, states still had anti-miscegnation laws on the books until 2000. If you want to get into court cases and how marriage laws evolved, I can do that. Legal and historical research is what I do most days.

Back up here - your original gripe was that you couldn't understand why non-gays would take issue with gay rights and I explained to you the logic. No matter how hard you try to paint this as some kind of liberal movement vs. a national awaking to the injustice of laws that discriminate based on someone's sexual orientation, the truth is in plain sight. In the tradition of the struggle for women's right to vote, for desegregation and to end laws against inter-racial marriages, we Americans fight fiercly for the very freedom and liberties our country was founded on. It's just too bad that can't see beyond your own subjectivity to see that this struggle for gay marriage is following a long tradition of justice for all.

It's a terrible injustice to grant rights on the basis of whom you like to **. In no way is this analygous to the strugge of women or racial minorites. As a woman and a racial minority, I strongly object to that comparison as manipulative and self-serving.

You think that because you still believe that being homosexual is a lifestyle choice. Its not. They are born that way so yes it is the same as racial discrimination (unless race is a choice too. Michael Jackson has grayed the issue somewhat).

Why put words in my mouth? I believe they were born that way, at least most are. That still doesn't change my views.

PS- race is a social construct, not a concrete biological fact.

Edited by Barza Woman
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...