31 year old man caught having anal intercourse with dog in the woods

[Fandango 1,440]

I beleive porking dogs is wrong. It's not natural.

I'm glad you said that. I wonder if anyone would like to define natural for me. How can anything that happens between two natural beings and be a consequence of natural impulses (however deviant) be unnatural? There is much in nature that we find repulsive, disgusting and violent... yet, it is all natural, isn't it?

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

And you know what I mean by that, so we can dissect each word six ways from Sunday, and we'll still be right here.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

Tell that to the next dog that tries to hump your leg

They don't respond to words so much as a swift kick

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I beleive porking dogs is wrong. It's not natural.

I'm glad you said that. I wonder if anyone would like to define natural for me. How can anything that happens between two natural beings and be a consequence of natural impulses (however deviant) be unnatural? There is much in nature that we find repulsive, disgusting and violent... yet, it is all natural, isn't it?

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

And you know what I mean by that, so we can dissect each word six ways from Sunday, and we'll still be right here.

I do know what you mean by it. Do you realize, however, that when you say an act that has occurred in nature is not natural, you're really only stating your own convictions?

And that's fine. We all have convictions. I happen to share yours that interspecies fukcing is not right. But I hesitate to say it's not natural because everything is natural. But the more important point I want to make is that we shouldn't get so hung up over whether something is natural or not. We shouldn't use naturalness as our litmus test of right and wrong. There are plenty of natural behaviors that we have criminalized and stigmatized (murder, for example) because we've deemed it wise to do so in order to have a more orderly human society.

As people, we've moved beyond the laws of nature and made our own. What's so wrong with saying that interspecies fukcing is wrong because we say so? Nature has nothing to do with it.

[Fandango 1,440]

I beleive porking dogs is wrong. It's not natural.

I'm glad you said that. I wonder if anyone would like to define natural for me. How can anything that happens between two natural beings and be a consequence of natural impulses (however deviant) be unnatural? There is much in nature that we find repulsive, disgusting and violent... yet, it is all natural, isn't it?

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

And you know what I mean by that, so we can dissect each word six ways from Sunday, and we'll still be right here.

I do know what you mean by it. Do you realize, however, that when you say an act that has occurred in nature is not natural, you're really only stating your own convictions?

And that's fine. We all have convictions. I happen to share yours that interspecies fukcing is not right. But I hesitate to say it's not natural because everything is natural. But the more important point I want to make is that we shouldn't get so hung up over whether something is natural or not. We shouldn't use naturalness as our litmus test of right and wrong. There are plenty of natural behaviors that we have criminalized and stigmatized (murder, for example) because we've deemed it wise to do so in order to have a more orderly human society.

As people, we've moved beyond the laws of nature and made our own. What's so wrong with saying that interspecies fukcing is wrong because we say so? Nature has nothing to do with it.

Well because I happen to think IT'S NOT NATURAL!!!! I realize that I am speaking my own convictions, but isn't that what we're doing here?

There are plenty of things not natural. Polyester, for one...

Salmon swimming upstream is natural. Rainbows are natural. Man fcuking fido is NOT NATURAL.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Well because I happen to think IT'S NOT NATURAL!!!! I realize that I am speaking my own convictions, but isn't that what we're doing here?

There are plenty of things not natural. Polyester, for one...

Salmon swimming upstream is natural. Rainbows are natural. Man fcuking fido is NOT NATURAL.

I suppose the word natural means two very different things to us. To me, the statement that something is natural or not natural is a statement of fact and not opinion. If it occurs in nature (i.e. in the known physical universe) then it is natural. If not, then it is not. Ball falling to the ground on earth is natural. Ball hovering in mid air on earth is not natural.

[Cristy 4]

I can't believe someone would rather have sex with an animal than to be gay. Sad.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

I can't believe someone would rather have sex with an animal than to be gay. Sad.

Yes, it is sad. There are many kinds of perversions in this world. Just when you thought you knew them all, CNN reports a brand new one.

[Ban Hammer 13,677]

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

Tell that to the next dog that tries to hump your leg

They don't respond to words so much as a swift kick

my grandmother had a little yap yap dog that loved legs.

I do know what you mean by it. Do you realize, however, that when you say an act that has occurred in nature is not natural, you're really only stating your own convictions?

And that's fine. We all have convictions. I happen to share yours that interspecies fukcing is not right. But I hesitate to say it's not natural because everything is natural. But the more important point I want to make is that we shouldn't get so hung up over whether something is natural or not. We shouldn't use naturalness as our litmus test of right and wrong. There are plenty of natural behaviors that we have criminalized and stigmatized (murder, for example) because we've deemed it wise to do so in order to have a more orderly human society.

As people, we've moved beyond the laws of nature and made our own. What's so wrong with saying that interspecies fukcing is wrong because we say so? Nature has nothing to do with it.

i'll put agent smith down as a supporter of the donkey show

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

A friend of my wife has three small children and when she went over there to visit once, when the mum was out of the room, my wife happened to see the family dog mount one of the children and hump the girls back while she was playing - apparently oblivious.

Dogs can be perverts too, and pedophiles apparently.

That dog should be on the sex offenders register!

Edited June 22, 2006 by Fishdude

[danae 0]

I can't believe someone would rather have sex with an animal than to be gay. Sad.

yes it is

[mawilson 2,133]

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

There's nothing unnatural about interspecific mating and breeding.

Examples:

- mule (a female horse and a male donkey)

- beefalo/cattalo (an American bison and a domestic cow)

- wolphin (a whale and a dolphin)

- tigon/liger (crosses between a lion and a tiger)

[almaty 19]

Interspecies fcuking is not natural.

Tell that to the next dog that tries to hump your leg

They don't respond to words so much as a swift kick

my grandmother had a little yap yap dog that loved legs.

I do know what you mean by it. Do you realize, however, that when you say an act that has occurred in nature is not natural, you're really only stating your own convictions?

And that's fine. We all have convictions. I happen to share yours that interspecies fukcing is not right. But I hesitate to say it's not natural because everything is natural. But the more important point I want to make is that we shouldn't get so hung up over whether something is natural or not. We shouldn't use naturalness as our litmus test of right and wrong. There are plenty of natural behaviors that we have criminalized and stigmatized (murder, for example) because we've deemed it wise to do so in order to have a more orderly human society.

As people, we've moved beyond the laws of nature and made our own. What's so wrong with saying that interspecies fukcing is wrong because we say so? Nature has nothing to do with it.

i'll put agent smith down as a supporter of the donkey show

#######!! leave the noble burro out of this perversion...

I can't believe someone would rather have sex with an animal than to be gay. Sad.

Yes, it is sad. There are many kinds of perversions in this world. Just when you thought you knew them all, CNN reports a brand new one.

i skip the details...but there are websites devoted to sh!t eaters and etc....life is full of strange chopf##ks...

[Artegal 1]

I beleive porking dogs is wrong. It's not natural.

I'm glad you said that. I wonder if anyone would like to define natural for me. How can anything that happens between two natural beings and be a consequence of natural impulses (however deviant) be unnatural? There is much in nature that we find repulsive, disgusting and violent... yet, it is all natural, isn't it?

However, porking a pig is completely natural and acceptible--especially if its smoked and barbecued!

[I'm Gone 60]

I can't believe someone would rather have sex with an animal than to be gay. Sad.

That isn't what I said. I said given the choice I would screw a dog before fudge packing another guy, not that I'm planning on doing either. Wife did ask me last night why I wanted her to put on the dog's collar. LOL

Edited June 23, 2006 by mdyoung

[Ban Hammer 13,677]

I can't believe someone would rather have sex with an animal than to be gay. Sad.

That isn't what I said. I said given the choice I would screw a dog before fudge packing another guy, not that I'm planning on doing either. Wife did ask me last night why I wanted her to put on the dog's collar. LOL