Lovelle Mixon: Oakland Police Shooter Kills 4 Cops

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

What an interesting villain this is, not only is he probably an expert shot, he's also ex army as well. Fascinating.

Sounds like a James Bond villain.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Apples to oranges. Assault rifles can fire off much faster and with more accuracy than high powered handgun and from a much farther distance.

Look, when the police are calling for assault rifle ban, then you know they have legitimate concerns for their safety as well that of citizens. It's really not that difficult to see the potential threat. And if you think any projectile weapon should be legal, why not allow missile launchers? Tanks? Reasonable regulations can and will be instituted...without any constitutional challenge. The gun lobby knows that which is why they focus their efforts on PR to scare citizens into thinking that the government wants to take away their guns. Pure fear mongering. In the meantime, police officers are dying.

yes, assault rifles can fire faster, but that's usually known as spray and pray. assault rifles are hindered in close quarters too.

So the perpetrator in this case barricaded himself in an apartment. Do you really think he would have been able to kill two heavily armored SWAT members as well as injuring a third one with anything other than an assault rifle? Because, if so, our police and SWAT are f##ked anytime someone wants to barricade themselves in building. Might as well bomb the building or fire rockets into it.

absolutely.

So then SWAT teams are committing suicide by storming into a building whenever someone has gun of any kind? Do you have any advice for them?

Edited March 23, 2009 by Mister Fancypants

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Perhaps BY should go in there with his sawed-off...

[Heracles 417]

Why would I do that BY. You've proven that the only voice you want to hear is your own.

The following posts of yours in this thread suggest otherwise

9, 11, 15, 20, 22, 25, 30, 32, 35, 40

Gave up after post 40 as there are just too many posts where your main goal is obviously to throw out the usual rubbish.

[Peikko 1,575]

Apples to oranges. Assault rifles can fire off much faster and with more accuracy than high powered handgun and from a much farther distance.

Look, when the police are calling for assault rifle ban, then you know they have legitimate concerns for their safety as well that of citizens. It's really not that difficult to see the potential threat. And if you think any projectile weapon should be legal, why not allow missile launchers? Tanks? Reasonable regulations can and will be instituted...without any constitutional challenge. The gun lobby knows that which is why they focus their efforts on PR to scare citizens into thinking that the government wants to take away their guns. Pure fear mongering. In the meantime, police officers are dying.

yes, assault rifles can fire faster, but that's usually known as spray and pray. assault rifles are hindered in close quarters too.

So the perpetrator in this case barricaded himself in an apartment. Do you really think he would have been able to kill two heavily armored SWAT members as well as injuring a third one with anything other than an assault rifle? Because, if so, our police and SWAT are f##ked anytime someone wants to barricade themselves in building. Might as well bomb the building or fire rockets into it.

absolutely.

So then SWAT teams are committing suicide by storming into a building whenever someone has gun of any kind? Do you have any advice for them?

I do, call in bomber command and wipe out the neighbourhood!

[Heracles 417]

Perhaps BY should go in there with his sawed-off...

I would have killed him for one reason. Lets see if you can guess it.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Perhaps BY should go in there with his sawed-off...

It's like arguing with a rock.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Why would I do that BY. You've proven that the only voice you want to hear is your own.

The following posts of yours in this thread suggest otherwise

9, 11, 15, 20, 22, 25, 30, 32, 35, 40

Gave up after post 40 as there are just too many posts where your main goal is obviously to throw out the usual rubbish.

Yeah yeah yeah.

And that victim ####### of yours (in nigh every post) is so fresh and vibrant.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Apples to oranges. Assault rifles can fire off much faster and with more accuracy than high powered handgun and from a much farther distance.

Look, when the police are calling for assault rifle ban, then you know they have legitimate concerns for their safety as well that of citizens. It's really not that difficult to see the potential threat. And if you think any projectile weapon should be legal, why not allow missile launchers? Tanks? Reasonable regulations can and will be instituted...without any constitutional challenge. The gun lobby knows that which is why they focus their efforts on PR to scare citizens into thinking that the government wants to take away their guns. Pure fear mongering. In the meantime, police officers are dying.

yes, assault rifles can fire faster, but that's usually known as spray and pray. assault rifles are hindered in close quarters too.

So the perpetrator in this case barricaded himself in an apartment. Do you really think he would have been able to kill two heavily armored SWAT members as well as injuring a third one with anything other than an assault rifle? Because, if so, our police and SWAT are f##ked anytime someone wants to barricade themselves in building. Might as well bomb the building or fire rockets into it.

absolutely.

So then SWAT teams are committing suicide by storming into a building whenever someone has gun of any kind? Do you have any advice for them?

I do, call in bomber command and wipe out the neighbourhood!

LOL...I had to scroll up to see who posted this. I was surprised.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Apples to oranges. Assault rifles can fire off much faster and with more accuracy than high powered handgun and from a much farther distance.

Look, when the police are calling for assault rifle ban, then you know they have legitimate concerns for their safety as well that of citizens. It's really not that difficult to see the potential threat. And if you think any projectile weapon should be legal, why not allow missile launchers? Tanks? Reasonable regulations can and will be instituted...without any constitutional challenge. The gun lobby knows that which is why they focus their efforts on PR to scare citizens into thinking that the government wants to take away their guns. Pure fear mongering. In the meantime, police officers are dying.

yes, assault rifles can fire faster, but that's usually known as spray and pray. assault rifles are hindered in close quarters too.

So the perpetrator in this case barricaded himself in an apartment. Do you really think he would have been able to kill two heavily armored SWAT members as well as injuring a third one with anything other than an assault rifle? Because, if so, our police and SWAT are f##ked anytime someone wants to barricade themselves in building. Might as well bomb the building or fire rockets into it.

absolutely.

So then SWAT teams are committing suicide by storming into a building whenever someone has gun of any kind? Do you have any advice for them?

I do, call in bomber command and wipe out the neighbourhood!

Why take the risk that he might survive in the rubble. Here's how to be sure...

Perhaps BY should go in there with his sawed-off...

I would have killed him for one reason. Lets see if you can guess it.

Don't be shy.

[Peikko 1,575]

You have to think outside the box FP.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Apples to oranges. Assault rifles can fire off much faster and with more accuracy than high powered handgun and from a much farther distance.

Look, when the police are calling for assault rifle ban, then you know they have legitimate concerns for their safety as well that of citizens. It's really not that difficult to see the potential threat. And if you think any projectile weapon should be legal, why not allow missile launchers? Tanks? Reasonable regulations can and will be instituted...without any constitutional challenge. The gun lobby knows that which is why they focus their efforts on PR to scare citizens into thinking that the government wants to take away their guns. Pure fear mongering. In the meantime, police officers are dying.

yes, assault rifles can fire faster, but that's usually known as spray and pray. assault rifles are hindered in close quarters too.

So the perpetrator in this case barricaded himself in an apartment. Do you really think he would have been able to kill two heavily armored SWAT members as well as injuring a third one with anything other than an assault rifle? Because, if so, our police and SWAT are f##ked anytime someone wants to barricade themselves in building. Might as well bomb the building or fire rockets into it.

absolutely.

So then SWAT teams are committing suicide by storming into a building whenever someone has gun of any kind? Do you have any advice for them?

I do, call in bomber command and wipe out the neighbourhood!

Why take the risk that he might survive in the rubble. Here's how to be sure...

Protecting our freedom to own any weapon under the guise of our 2nd Amendment Right.

[Heracles 417]

Perhaps BY should go in there with his sawed-off...

It's like arguing with a rock.

Your the one who has a fit when someone doesn't bow down to your conversational level. Remember, your buddy Alex+R used to pull the same #######. Where the second you didn't discuss what she wanted or the angle she wanted to discuss, she threw out the insults.

Which in this case you are clearly blaming the weapon (high power riffle) rather than the perpetrator. Another reason you spit the dummy is because your hypocrisy is caught out. Like you are pro legalizing drugs and are against the old prohibition but are for restricting guns. I'm guessing in your brain this is not moronic..

Edited March 23, 2009 by Constellation

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Apples to oranges. Assault rifles can fire off much faster and with more accuracy than high powered handgun and from a much farther distance.

Look, when the police are calling for assault rifle ban, then you know they have legitimate concerns for their safety as well that of citizens. It's really not that difficult to see the potential threat. And if you think any projectile weapon should be legal, why not allow missile launchers? Tanks? Reasonable regulations can and will be instituted...without any constitutional challenge. The gun lobby knows that which is why they focus their efforts on PR to scare citizens into thinking that the government wants to take away their guns. Pure fear mongering. In the meantime, police officers are dying.

yes, assault rifles can fire faster, but that's usually known as spray and pray. assault rifles are hindered in close quarters too.

So the perpetrator in this case barricaded himself in an apartment. Do you really think he would have been able to kill two heavily armored SWAT members as well as injuring a third one with anything other than an assault rifle? Because, if so, our police and SWAT are f##ked anytime someone wants to barricade themselves in building. Might as well bomb the building or fire rockets into it.

absolutely.

So then SWAT teams are committing suicide by storming into a building whenever someone has gun of any kind? Do you have any advice for them?

I do, call in bomber command and wipe out the neighbourhood!

Why take the risk that he might survive in the rubble. Here's how to be sure...

Protecting our freedom to own any weapon under the guise of our 2nd Amendment Right.

I always wondered about that - if the arguments in support of the 2nd amendment should apply to nuclear proliferation. Nukes seem a better deterrent than guns.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

You have to think outside the box FP.

Yep. The litter box is getting pretty smelly...I think BY has an intestinal parasite.

I always wondered about that - if the arguments in support of the 2nd amendment should apply to nuclear proliferation. Nukes seem a better deterrent than guns.

Yep. Ask a gun advocate what they think about that?