Reid seeks to clarify stimulus rule on casinos

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Nevada Sen. Harry Reid has sent a letter to President Barack Obama asking for clarification to a provision that restricts casinos from using federal stimulus funds.

The Democratic majority leader says in a letter sent Friday that the provision is "overly broad" and is discouraging nonprofit groups from applying for stimulus money.

Reid argues that casinos are often the only suitable space for conferences and workshops held by community organizations. He also cites a women's group that often uses casino hotel rooms as transitional housing for victims of violence.

The Senate approved the provision, introduced by Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, last month in a 73-24 vote. Reid voted against the measure, while Nevada Republican Sen. John Ensign supported it.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., sent the following letter to President Barack Obama regarding the use of economic recovery funds Friday. Text of the letter follows:

The President

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

I am writing to you about an issue relating to the implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (AARA, P.L. No. 111-5) that is critical to the State of Nevada. Section 1604 of the AARA included a prohibition on the use of funds appropriated by the bill for certain facilities, including casinos and other gaming establishments. It has come to my attention that solicitations and related guidance relating to requests for funding under the bill includes language to implement section 1604 that is vague and overly broad, causing confusion and discouraging many eligible beneficiaries in Nevada from applying for funding.

Specifically, the language on grant solicitations and other guidance creates the impression that otherwise eligible grant/funding recipients conducting activities wholly appropriate to the grant/funding program may not hold events at facilities that are part of a hotel/casino complex. This is a non-sensical and overly broad interpretation of section 1604. The intent of section 1604 was to prohibit the facilities delineated in that section from being direct beneficiaries of funding provided under the ARRA (e.g., to receive construction funds or funds to assist their operations). It was not intended to restrict the location of activities wholly appropriate to the grant/funding program and conducted by otherwise eligible grant/funding recipients.

The overly broad language hurts non-profits in Nevada, especially. Nevada has a long history of community integration with hotel/casino complexes, which has created a unique environment in which hotel/casino complexes are often the most appropriate venue for certain activities, particularly holding public events such as community outreach events, Parent Teacher Association meetings, domestic violence trainings, and other workshops.

A couple of specific examples are illustrative of the problems caused by the overly broad language. The Department of Justice-Office on Violence Against Women's Transition Housing Assistance Program offers funding to provide victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking supportive services such as short-term housing assistance. In many Nevada rural communities the only hotel rooms available are in casinos. The overly broad restriction deprives victims of a safe place away from their attackers. Additionally, the Department of Justice-Office on Violence Against Women has encouraged domestic violence coalitions to hold community conferences and workshops to stimulate the local economy. The only suitable conference space in Nevada is often found in hotel/casino complexes. If the overly broad language is maintained, it would be impossible to hold conferences and workshops in many Nevada communities.

Nevada organizations that could qualify for grants/funding under the AARA are already being dissuaded from applying because of this confusion. Therefore, it is my hope that you will ensure that the appropriate office(s) issue a clarifying statement as soon as possible that an entity otherwise eligible to receive a grant/funding under the ARRA, conducting activities otherwise eligible to receive a grant/funding under the ARRA, is not restricted in the location of the activity.

Thank you for taking steps to rectify this misunderstanding.

Sincerely,

HARRY REID

Majority Leader

http://www.krnv.com/Global/story.asp?S=10043348

[DEDixon 39]

Casino shouldn't be made to suffer. Vegas and Reno are ghost towns right now which puts the middle class out of work. It is better to let the stimulus to be used to keep the middle class working than for it to go to executives who already have enough and so won't even spend it. Put the stimulus in the hands of people who will spend it - whether it is buying HDTVs at Bestbuy or feeding the slot machines in LV, it doesn't matter.

If corporation want to give away money, give to the rank and file, at least they will spend it. You know, spending is what America does best.

[DEDixon 39]

Scratch the reply above, this one is better:

Casino shouldn't be made to suffer. Vegas and Reno are ghost towns right now which puts the middle class out of work. It is better to let the stimulus be used to keep the middle class working than for it to go to executives who already have enough and so won't even spend it. Put the stimulus in the hands of people who will spend it - whether it is buying HDTVs at Bestbuy or feeding the slot machines in LV, it doesn't matter. But, in after thought, better to spend it in LV, at least it stays in America.

If corporation want to give away money, give to the rank and file, at least they will spend it. You know, spending is what America does best.

I thought it was a real shame when Wells Fargo canceled an employee's gig in LV under pressure.... that could have kept some Americans employed. It isn't the same as a bonus.

[Brad and Vika 129]

I agree - why should the AIGs of the world be the only beneficiaries of all the free (taxpayer) money?