What is Going on at Fox News?

[Peikko 1,575]

I watched the clip, I have a perfect right to comment on it. Are you suggesting that for some reason, because it's not my regular media diet I have no right to have a view on it? What a crock of ###### that is. That douche is a phony, the 9/12 project is a bunch of ####### and the whole concept uses emotional blackmail to produce, what? I nice collage of people's faces on a wall. Bravo, great job.

Now, again, what about that clip did you like? Did nothing about it make you feel even a little uncomfortable? Nothing about it made you think that perhaps there is something more to this than an expression of support for ones country (not that that does anything for me anyway, I think that's a crock of ###### too, but then I am a huge cynic).

MC remember I too am from a Briiiiiitish country. The one thing similar about our countries is that people generally don't give a ####### about politics unless some sort of bandwagon issue comes up. A Glenn Beck equivalent in either countries wouldn't even get five viewers. Whereas people here are actually involved when it comes to politics.

I have been critical of the country since day one but when it comes to politics people here are passionate. Which is good. On the other hand I just wish there was some middle ground as this same passion can quickly divide the country and be counter productive. Unfortunately lately divisiveness is gaining speed here hence why nobody can do anything right. Almost every superpower has collapsed due to similar bickering and divisiveness. Divisiveness leads to animosity. Which leads to destruction.

which has to do with this subject what, exactly? I am quite clearly demonstrating both an interest in politics and a knowledge of what can be considered political, and what can be considered theater. This wonderful clip is highly dramatic, but it signifies, well nothing.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Then again many of you here are just like fellow liberal Keith Olbermann or the biggest douche of them all John StewClown. Two guys who spend 99.95% of their shows basically criticizing others and other's views/opinions.

PD must be a huge fan of these guys. They sing the same tune after all.

Actually I dont watch either of them - although I did see Stewart's attack on Jim Cramer and CNBC. Pretty insightful criticism I thought.

So may I presume that you are starting with the personal attacks so you can later whine and cry about how you are picked upon by that shadowy secret society that is out to get you - known as "the group"?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well.

I could set my watch to it.

You can also set your watch to their denial of it.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well.

I could set my watch to it.

You can also set your watch to their denial of it.

I can also set my watch to you and BY's self-congratulatory back slapping and sycophantism - but who's counting

[Heracles 417]

Post a clip and see who comments, but to suggest that because in a thread about one program/presenter there is no mention of these other people automatically means that people who have posted critically support these other people is quite frankly stupid. It's par for the course, as you constantly make these absurd connections which have nothing to do with anything anyone really thinks or believes, but somehow it makes you feel good I guess, or why would you do it?

The stupidity and absurdity isn't coming from me, sissy. I read this board every day and see nothing on the right re criticism of the left that compares to the obsession leftist have with criticising the right. They "won" and they're still angry about it. It's actually entertaining to watch

Happens all the time. They attack the person rather than discussing the issue. Then when a person like myself finally has enough and goes for the knee caps. Suspeeeended!!

Another win for the libs, all while never actually stating an opinion with regards to the topic, or issue, of their own. Excluding Gary pretty much every other conservative here has been made out to be some sort of moronic drunk racist ignorant lying idiot. Then when you slap out the credentials, you are conceded and some sort of freak.

The latest is that we are just whining.

Edited March 19, 2009 by Constellation

[Peikko 1,575]

Then again many of you here are just like fellow liberal Keith Olbermann or the biggest douche of them all John StewClown. Two guys who spend 99.95% of their shows basically criticizing others and other's views/opinions.

PD must be a huge fan of these guys. They sing the same tune after all.

The first thing I thought was why don't I see the same criticisms of Keith Olbermann, Chris "tingle up my leg" Matthews, or Rachel Maddow, not to mention all of the leftist sycophants in Hollywood and the arts? Phil Donahue was on Hannity last night, and he literally made me puke with his adoration of Obama based on such shallow and intellectually lazy observations as how beautiful hsi family is and how well-spoken he is. Give me a break? This, and being Black, is all that Obama needed to do to win the election. He is, as Biden noted, articulate and clean.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well.

Post a clip and see who comments, but to suggest that because in a thread about one program/presenter there is no mention of these other people automatically means that people who have posted critically support these other people is quite frankly stupid. It's par for the course, as you constantly make these absurd connections which have nothing to do with anything anyone really thinks or believes, but somehow it makes you feel good I guess, or why would you do it?

The stupidity and absurdity isn't coming from me, sissy. I read this board every day and see nothing on the right re criticism of the left that compares to the obsession leftist have with criticising the right. They "won" and they're still angry about it. It's actually entertaining to watch

Sissy? Right, moving swiftly on, again, you have created anger where none exists, you have created obsession where none exists, and you have contributed nothing to the thread whatsoever because your remarks have no connection with the OP's topic.

[Heracles 417]

The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well.

I could set my watch to it.

You can also set your watch to their denial of it.

I can also set my watch to you and BY's self-congratulatory back slapping and sycophantism - but who's counting

point proven.

Edited March 19, 2009 by Constellation

[Peikko 1,575]

Post a clip and see who comments, but to suggest that because in a thread about one program/presenter there is no mention of these other people automatically means that people who have posted critically support these other people is quite frankly stupid. It's par for the course, as you constantly make these absurd connections which have nothing to do with anything anyone really thinks or believes, but somehow it makes you feel good I guess, or why would you do it?

The stupidity and absurdity isn't coming from me, sissy. I read this board every day and see nothing on the right re criticism of the left that compares to the obsession leftist have with criticising the right. They "won" and they're still angry about it. It's actually entertaining to watch

Happens all the time. They attack the person rather than discussing the issue. Then when a person like myself finally has enough and goes for the knee caps. Suspeeeended!!

Another win for the libs, all while never actually stating an opinion with regards to the topic, or issue, of their own. Excluding Gary pretty much every other conservative here has been made out to be some sort of moronic idiot. Then when you slap out the credentials, you are conceded and some sort of freak.

The latest is that we are just whining.

You get suspended because you post things that are against the TOS, not because there is some librul conspiracy. Don't blame me for your inability to post appropriately.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

BY - never let it be said by anyone (anywhere) that you don't see what you want to see.

After all - according to you the black community in this country is made up exclusively of people in saggy pants with bandana's driving BMWs with tinted windows and a sub-machine gun on the passenger seat, listening to hippity-hop music.

[Peikko 1,575]

, what credentials? What a freak. Honestly, it's not worth the bother.

[fozzie 41]

The right attack the person and not the issue. The left attack the person and not the issue. Its called politics, unfortunately. Both sides do it, both sides whine that the otther side does it. They know they do it as its all part of the game, its the idiots that buy into it that worry me.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well.

I could set my watch to it.

You can also set your watch to their denial of it.

I can also set my watch to you and BY's self-congratulatory back slapping and sycophantism - but who's counting

point proven.

If you like. Its not like I'm obligated to post for your approval.

[Heracles 417]

BY - never let it be said by anyone (anywhere) that you don't see what you want to see.

After all - according to you the black community in this country is made up exclusively of people in saggy pants with bandana's driving BMWs with tinted windows and a sub-machine gun on the passenger seat, listening to hippity-hop music.

Likewise, according to you this is made up. Yet when challenged to meet up and verify this in person, you decline.

Haven't seen too many Brits dressed in baggy / saggy pants. Have you?

If you like. Its not like I'm obligated to post for your approval.

Yet you sure have taken on the role of OT forum watcher and feel you have the right to rebut, antagonize or attack any poster you disagree with here.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

BY - never let it be said by anyone (anywhere) that you don't see what you want to see.

After all - according to you the black community in this country is made up exclusively of people in saggy pants with bandana's driving BMWs with tinted windows and a sub-machine gun on the passenger seat, listening to hippity-hop music.

Likewise, according to you this is made up. Yet when challenged to meet up and verify this in person, you decline.

Haven't seen too many Brits dressed in baggy / saggy pants. Have you?

Most stereotypes have some basis in fact. The difference is to what extent you rely on those stereotypes to form your opinions about the world.

With you hardly anything comes down to what you've seen or experienced directly, but rather innuendo and what Joe Manonthestreet has allegedly told you.

[Heracles 417]

, what credentials? What a freak. Honestly, it's not worth the bother.

Quite simple. When you or your buddies call someone an idiot or any other insult against their intelligence they usually ask to compare qualifications. Coincidentally, this is when most of you change tune.

Hence the above response in red. Also know as not being able to walk the talk. Your smarter than me?Great. Now prove it otherwise shut your mouth.

Edited March 19, 2009 by Constellation