Jump to content
one...two...tree

What is Going on at Fox News?

 Share

108 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Then again many of you here are just like fellow liberal Keith Olbermann or the biggest douche of them all John StewClown. Two guys who spend 99.95% of their shows basically criticizing others and other's views/opinions.

PD must be a huge fan of these guys. They sing the same tune after all.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I wouldn't know, I don't listen to or watch any of these types of programs, unless they are posted on a message board such as this one. I still prefer the BBC and listen to Radio 4 most of the time. However, you forgot to post what it was about that program you found particularly thrilling. I am dying to know.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did that get broadcast on a newscast? That's just mental - it's like the 'secret' and radio nutters all rolled into one. It's almost scary, 9/12 project, what a joke and people call Obama the messiah?

9/12 project, comparing that to people who claim Obama to be the Messiah is a horrible comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did that get broadcast on a newscast? That's just mental - it's like the 'secret' and radio nutters all rolled into one. It's almost scary, 9/12 project, what a joke and people call Obama the messiah?

9/12 project, comparing that to people who claim Obama to be the Messiah is a horrible comparison.

Wrong comparison. I was comparing that douche in the clip to a false 'messiah' figure. All those faux tears and fake compassion, all that drawing on emotional strings? If that's not someone's idea of a false messiah, I am not sure what is.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

So, nothing about that clip bothers you, or makes you uncomfortable? Excellent, good to know.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't know, I don't listen to or watch any of these types of programs, unless they are posted on a message board such as this one. I still prefer the BBC and listen to Radio 4 most of the time. However, you forgot to post what it was about that program you found particularly thrilling. I am dying to know.

So don't comment then.

Coming from the UK your opinions are not surprising though. After all I just saw a study from the BBC which showed that 1% of Britys actually care about the politics in their country. So naturally for you someone passionate about their country is some sort of freak.

Edited by Constellation

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't know, I don't listen to or watch any of these types of programs, unless they are posted on a message board such as this one. I still prefer the BBC and listen to Radio 4 most of the time. However, you forgot to post what it was about that program you found particularly thrilling. I am dying to know.

So don't comment then.

I watched the clip, I have a perfect right to comment on it. Are you suggesting that for some reason, because it's not my regular media diet I have no right to have a view on it? What a crock of ###### that is. That douche is a phony, the 9/12 project is a bunch of ####### and the whole concept uses emotional blackmail to produce, what? I nice collage of people's faces on a wall. Bravo, great job.

Now, again, what about that clip did you like? Did nothing about it make you feel even a little uncomfortable? Nothing about it made you think that perhaps there is something more to this than an expression of support for ones country (not that that does anything for me anyway, I think that's a crock of ###### too, but then I am a huge cynic).

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did that get broadcast on a newscast? That's just mental - it's like the 'secret' and radio nutters all rolled into one. It's almost scary, 9/12 project, what a joke and people call Obama the messiah?

9/12 project, comparing that to people who claim Obama to be the Messiah is a horrible comparison.

Wrong comparison. I was comparing that douche in the clip to a false 'messiah' figure. All those faux tears and fake compassion, all that drawing on emotional strings? If that's not someone's idea of a false messiah, I am not sure what is.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

So, nothing about that clip bothers you, or makes you uncomfortable? Excellent, good to know.

thats a stretch but you also did mention Obama, how does he fit into your comparison

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't know, I don't listen to or watch any of these types of programs, unless they are posted on a message board such as this one. I still prefer the BBC and listen to Radio 4 most of the time. However, you forgot to post what it was about that program you found particularly thrilling. I am dying to know.

So don't comment then.

Coming from the UK your opinions are not surprising though. After all I just saw a study from the BBC which showed that 1% of Britys actually care about the politics in their country. So naturally for you someone passionate about their country is some sort of freak.

You connected these dots how, exactly? Another BY wander down the sidelines of reality.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Israel
Timeline
Then again many of you here are just like fellow liberal Keith Olbermann or the biggest douche of them all John StewClown. Two guys who spend 99.95% of their shows basically criticizing others and other's views/opinions.

PD must be a huge fan of these guys. They sing the same tune after all.

The first thing I thought was why don't I see the same criticisms of Keith Olbermann, Chris "tingle up my leg" Matthews, or Rachel Maddow, not to mention all of the leftist sycophants in Hollywood and the arts? Phil Donahue was on Hannity last night, and he literally made me puke with his adoration of Obama based on such shallow and intellectually lazy observations as how beautiful his family is and how well-spoken he is. Give me a break? This, and being Black, is all that Obama needed to do to win the election. He is, as Biden noted, articulate and clean.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well. :thumbs:

Edited by Barza Woman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did that get broadcast on a newscast? That's just mental - it's like the 'secret' and radio nutters all rolled into one. It's almost scary, 9/12 project, what a joke and people call Obama the messiah?

9/12 project, comparing that to people who claim Obama to be the Messiah is a horrible comparison.

Wrong comparison. I was comparing that douche in the clip to a false 'messiah' figure. All those faux tears and fake compassion, all that drawing on emotional strings? If that's not someone's idea of a false messiah, I am not sure what is.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

So, nothing about that clip bothers you, or makes you uncomfortable? Excellent, good to know.

thats a stretch but you also did mention Obama, how does he fit into your comparison

*sigh* you do know people call Obama a 'Messiah', don't you? I said, quite clearly that this douche in the clip exhibits far more messiah traits than Obama (who is often called a messiah). That's it.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then again many of you here are just like fellow liberal Keith Olbermann or the biggest douche of them all John StewClown. Two guys who spend 99.95% of their shows basically criticizing others and other's views/opinions.

PD must be a huge fan of these guys. They sing the same tune after all.

The first thing I thought was why don't I see the same criticisms of Keith Olbermann, Chris "tingle up my leg" Matthews, or Rachel Maddow, not to mention all of the leftist sycophants in Hollywood and the arts? Phil Donahue was on Hannity last night, and he literally made me puke with his adoration of Obama based on such shallow and intellectually lazy observations as how beautiful hsi family is and how well-spoken he is. Give me a break? This, and being Black, is all that Obama needed to do to win the election. He is, as Biden noted, articulate and clean.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well. :thumbs:

Post a clip and see who comments, but to suggest that because in a thread about one program/presenter there is no mention of these other people automatically means that people who have posted critically support these other people is quite frankly stupid. It's par for the course, as you constantly make these absurd connections which have nothing to do with anything anyone really thinks or believes, but somehow it makes you feel good I guess, or why would you do it?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the clip, I have a perfect right to comment on it. Are you suggesting that for some reason, because it's not my regular media diet I have no right to have a view on it? What a crock of ###### that is. That douche is a phony, the 9/12 project is a bunch of ####### and the whole concept uses emotional blackmail to produce, what? I nice collage of people's faces on a wall. Bravo, great job.

Now, again, what about that clip did you like? Did nothing about it make you feel even a little uncomfortable? Nothing about it made you think that perhaps there is something more to this than an expression of support for ones country (not that that does anything for me anyway, I think that's a crock of ###### too, but then I am a huge cynic).

MC remember I too am from a Briiiiiitish country. The one thing similar about our countries is that people generally don't give a ####### about politics unless some sort of bandwagon issue comes up. A Glenn Beck equivalent in either countries wouldn't even get five viewers. Whereas people here are actually involved when it comes to politics.

I have been critical of the country since day one but when it comes to politics people here are passionate. Which is good. On the other hand I just wish there was some middle ground as this same passion can quickly divide the country and be counter productive. Unfortunately lately divisiveness is gaining speed here hence why nobody can do anything right. Almost every superpower has collapsed due to similar bickering and divisiveness. Divisiveness leads to animosity. Which leads to destruction.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Israel
Timeline
Then again many of you here are just like fellow liberal Keith Olbermann or the biggest douche of them all John StewClown. Two guys who spend 99.95% of their shows basically criticizing others and other's views/opinions.

PD must be a huge fan of these guys. They sing the same tune after all.

The first thing I thought was why don't I see the same criticisms of Keith Olbermann, Chris "tingle up my leg" Matthews, or Rachel Maddow, not to mention all of the leftist sycophants in Hollywood and the arts? Phil Donahue was on Hannity last night, and he literally made me puke with his adoration of Obama based on such shallow and intellectually lazy observations as how beautiful hsi family is and how well-spoken he is. Give me a break? This, and being Black, is all that Obama needed to do to win the election. He is, as Biden noted, articulate and clean.

So, you thought that was a good show then did you? Interesting, what did you like about it?

No. I don't judge a person on a 10 minute snippet. While Glen has extreme right wing views and many that I don't agree with, he at least is passionate about his country and what he thinks is the best course of action for the country. Hence the actual definition and context of the first amendment.

I have never heard him spend more than 1 minute a week pulling a Olbermann or Stewart. The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views. I listen to both when driving and even watch both on TV. Expect Stewart as he is a disingenuous class A douche.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well. :thumbs:

Post a clip and see who comments, but to suggest that because in a thread about one program/presenter there is no mention of these other people automatically means that people who have posted critically support these other people is quite frankly stupid. It's par for the course, as you constantly make these absurd connections which have nothing to do with anything anyone really thinks or believes, but somehow it makes you feel good I guess, or why would you do it?

The stupidity and absurdity isn't coming from me, sissy. I read this board every day and see nothing on the right re criticism of the left that compares to the obsession leftist have with criticising the right. They "won" and they're still angry about it. It's actually entertaining to watch :lol:

Edited by Barza Woman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest difference between conservative and liberal hosts is that conservatives talk about their own views. Whereas, liberal hosts spend the majority of their time criticizing conservatives views.

Gospel truth, demonstrated repeatedly on this board, as well. :thumbs:

I could set my watch to it.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...