A lesbian tries to inseminate her wife with her brother's semen

[almaty 19]

wow...

[Danno 1,228]

'HAL 9000' date='Mar 16 2009, 02:36 PM' post='2742292']

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring, so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought upon others.

-------------------------------------------

Are you under some impression that there are people and/or societies anywhere in the world who do not impose limitations on others?

Either some very powerful leader(s) does it or people collectively do it.

We are both one small part of this "collective of thought" which sets limits.... sometime legal limits, sometimes social limits.

Don't hate the player.... hate the game Hal.

[HAL 9000 96]

'HAL 9000' date='Mar 16 2009, 02:36 PM' post='2742292']

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring, so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought upon others.

-------------------------------------------

Are you under some impression that there are people and/or societies anywhere in the world who do not impose limitations on others?

Either some very powerful leader(s) does it or people collectively do it.

We are both one small part of this "collective of thought" which sets limits.... sometime legal limits, sometimes social limits.

Don't hate the player.... hate the game Hal.

The game is called life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Your excuse is cheap and apologetic for imposing what is not yours to impose.

[mkg265 2]

Crazy rape. Thankfully the one woman got away without too much damage.

A million points for anyone that can remember the name of the current lesbian Hollywood couple were both women are preggo. Name slipped my mind. One of them is a director.

[Scott & Lai 12]

Eeeeewwwwwwwwwww...

Sunday churchgoers rejoice at this clear and obvious example of evil homosexual behavior.

A lesbian family having a baby together. But I'm quit sure the usual suspects look at it as social progress and an example of America finally maturing in the right direction (namely a hard Left). Heather's Two Mommies? Yuk! No thanks. I'm not buying into this lunacy.

A female co-worker and friend of mine had a baby through in vitro (her partner had the baby). Both of them loved that child just any loving couple would. When we have babies left in dumpsters or stories of mothers putting their toddlers into clothes dryers, our focus on just what it takes to nurture a child is off kilter.

Kind of odd to compare this to Dumpster babies to make it seem "good".

And by the way, we generally are interested in the "welfare of Children" and their outcome, the warm fuzzy feelings a parent might or might not have from raising them is irrelevant.

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring, so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought upon others.

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

[AnaAndDaniel 0]

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

ruh roh

now you did it Scott.

you are thinking way too natural and logical for some.

Daniel

p.s. i think what this woman tried to do is despicable. regardeless of orientation. they ought to throw her into the slammer for years.

Edited March 17, 2009 by AnaAndDaniel

[Scott & Lai 12]

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

ruh roh

now you did it Scott.

you are thinking way too natural and logical for some.

Daniel

p.s. i think what this woman tried to do is despicable. regardeless of orientation. they ought to throw her into the slammer for years.

I agree. It's a form of rape.

[HAL 9000 96]

Eeeeewwwwwwwwwww...

Sunday churchgoers rejoice at this clear and obvious example of evil homosexual behavior.

A lesbian family having a baby together. But I'm quit sure the usual suspects look at it as social progress and an example of America finally maturing in the right direction (namely a hard Left). Heather's Two Mommies? Yuk! No thanks. I'm not buying into this lunacy.

A female co-worker and friend of mine had a baby through in vitro (her partner had the baby). Both of them loved that child just any loving couple would. When we have babies left in dumpsters or stories of mothers putting their toddlers into clothes dryers, our focus on just what it takes to nurture a child is off kilter.

Kind of odd to compare this to Dumpster babies to make it seem "good".

And by the way, we generally are interested in the "welfare of Children" and their outcome, the warm fuzzy feelings a parent might or might not have from raising them is irrelevant.

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring, so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought upon others.

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

Who's implying that a heterosexual couple isn't? Hint: You.

[Scott & Lai 12]

Eeeeewwwwwwwwwww...

Sunday churchgoers rejoice at this clear and obvious example of evil homosexual behavior.

A lesbian family having a baby together. But I'm quit sure the usual suspects look at it as social progress and an example of America finally maturing in the right direction (namely a hard Left). Heather's Two Mommies? Yuk! No thanks. I'm not buying into this lunacy.

A female co-worker and friend of mine had a baby through in vitro (her partner had the baby). Both of them loved that child just any loving couple would. When we have babies left in dumpsters or stories of mothers putting their toddlers into clothes dryers, our focus on just what it takes to nurture a child is off kilter.

Kind of odd to compare this to Dumpster babies to make it seem "good".

And by the way, we generally are interested in the "welfare of Children" and their outcome, the warm fuzzy feelings a parent might or might not have from raising them is irrelevant.

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring, so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought upon others.

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

Who's implying that a heterosexual couple isn't? Hint: You.

Isn't what? I think you're missing my point...

[HAL 9000 96]

Eeeeewwwwwwwwwww...

Sunday churchgoers rejoice at this clear and obvious example of evil homosexual behavior.

A lesbian family having a baby together. But I'm quit sure the usual suspects look at it as social progress and an example of America finally maturing in the right direction (namely a hard Left). Heather's Two Mommies? Yuk! No thanks. I'm not buying into this lunacy.

A female co-worker and friend of mine had a baby through in vitro (her partner had the baby). Both of them loved that child just any loving couple would. When we have babies left in dumpsters or stories of mothers putting their toddlers into clothes dryers, our focus on just what it takes to nurture a child is off kilter.

Kind of odd to compare this to Dumpster babies to make it seem "good".

And by the way, we generally are interested in the "welfare of Children" and their outcome, the warm fuzzy feelings a parent might or might not have from raising them is irrelevant.

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring (*for his kids*), so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought (*that he can impose what he thinks is a family that can provide a loving environment for a child*) upon others.

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

Who's implying that a heterosexual couple isn't? Hint: You.

Isn't what? I think you're missing my point...

Which was? (yes, definitely missed it- as my point to Danno has nothing to do with loving homes but rather, some folks' desire to impose their values where they do not belong). Maybe you can see something I can't in my own point.

I think you may just want clarification, so I'll defer to the point I was making in red. I think you just want to discuss the obvious as if I were somehow assaulting undisputed families- which I am not.

[Scott & Lai 12]

Eeeeewwwwwwwwwww...

Sunday churchgoers rejoice at this clear and obvious example of evil homosexual behavior.

A lesbian family having a baby together. But I'm quit sure the usual suspects look at it as social progress and an example of America finally maturing in the right direction (namely a hard Left). Heather's Two Mommies? Yuk! No thanks. I'm not buying into this lunacy.

A female co-worker and friend of mine had a baby through in vitro (her partner had the baby). Both of them loved that child just any loving couple would. When we have babies left in dumpsters or stories of mothers putting their toddlers into clothes dryers, our focus on just what it takes to nurture a child is off kilter.

Kind of odd to compare this to Dumpster babies to make it seem "good".

And by the way, we generally are interested in the "welfare of Children" and their outcome, the warm fuzzy feelings a parent might or might not have from raising them is irrelevant.

What you are interested in is in imposing your ignorance upon others. You provided a loving home for your offspring (*for his kids*), so stop subscribing to the school of thought that you have a right to impose your limitations of thought (*that he can impose what he thinks is a family that can provide a loving environment for a child*) upon others.

So is there no benefit a child receives from having both a mother and a father, other than a "loving home"?

Who's implying that a heterosexual couple isn't? Hint: You.

Isn't what? I think you're missing my point...

Which was? (yes, definitely missed it- as my point to Danno has nothing to do with loving homes but rather, some folks' desire to impose their values where they do not belong). Maybe you can see something I can't in my own point.

I think you may just want clarification, so I'll defer to the point I was making in red. I think you just want to discuss the obvious as if I were somehow assaulting undisputed families- which I am not.

Ok, perhaps I should have edited down the part I quoted more... The main thing I was referring to was, "You provided a loving home for your offspring"... the argument is often made that homosexual parents also provide loving homes for children, just as heterosexual couples do, as though that were the only thing that mattered. My question is, is there no benefit beyond that which having both a mother and father provides which is not gained with a homosexual couple?

[HAL 9000 96]

Pretty good question, Scott.

I suppose that would depend on what kind of roles the homosexual parents take, and more importantly, if (at least in the case of adopted children) there is a significant difference that would make a homosexual union any less of a set of capable parents when compared to heterosexual unions. From personal experience observing several cases in the past as a teacher with a couple of adopted kids in a homosexual parental relationship I can say that no, there is no adverse or otherwise detrimental effect on the children. If I were to look at the grade book from that time, I could also probably point to average to above-average grades for those children. What would that imply? Nothing really.